Literature DB >> 10188608

Chronic intracortical microstimulation (ICMS) of cat sensory cortex using the Utah Intracortical Electrode Array.

P J Rousche1, R A Normann.   

Abstract

In an effort to assess the safety and efficacy of focal intracortical microstimulation (ICMS) of cerebral cortex with an array of penetrating electrodes as might be applied to a neuroprosthetic device to aid the deaf or blind, we have chronically implanted three trained cats in primary auditory cortex with the 100-electrode Utah Intracortical Electrode Array (UIEA). Eleven of the 100 electrodes were hard-wired to a percutaneous connector for chronic access. Prior to implant, cats were trained to "lever-press" in response to pure tone auditory stimulation. After implant, this behavior was transferred to "lever-presses" in response to current injections via single electrodes of the implanted arrays. Psychometric function curves relating injected charge level to the probability of response were obtained for stimulation of 22 separate electrodes in the three implanted cats. The average threshold charge/phase required for electrical stimulus detection in each cat was, 8.5, 8.6, and 11.6 nC/phase respectively, with a maximum charge/phase of 26 nC/phase and a minimum of 1.5 nC/phase thresholds were tracked for varying time intervals, and seven electrodes from two cats were tracked for up to 100 days. Electrodes were stimulated for no more than a few minutes each day. Neural recordings taken from the same electrodes before and after multiple electrical stimulation sessions were very similar in signal/noise ratio and in the number of recordable units, suggesting that the range of electrical stimulation levels used did not damage neurons in the vicinity of the electrodes. Although a few early implants failed, we conclude that ICMS of cerebral cortex to evoke a behavioral response can be achieved with the penetrating UIEA. Further experiments in support of a sensory cortical prosthesis based on ICMS are warranted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10188608     DOI: 10.1109/86.750552

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng        ISSN: 1063-6528


  34 in total

Review 1.  Insights into cortical mechanisms of behavior from microstimulation experiments.

Authors:  Mark H Histed; Amy M Ni; John H R Maunsell
Journal:  Prog Neurobiol       Date:  2012-01-28       Impact factor: 11.685

2.  Non-rectangular waveforms for neural stimulation with practical electrodes.

Authors:  Mesut Sahin; Yanmei Tie
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2007-05-02       Impact factor: 5.379

3.  Finite element analysis of a floating microstimulator.

Authors:  Mesut Sahin; Syed S Ur-Rahman
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.802

4.  How advances in neural recording affect data analysis.

Authors:  Ian H Stevenson; Konrad P Kording
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 24.884

5.  Chemical neurostimulation using pulse code modulation (PCM) microfluidic chips.

Authors:  Farouk Azizi; Hui Lu; Hillel J Chiel; Carlos H Mastrangelo
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2010-07-27       Impact factor: 2.390

6.  The effect of chronic intracortical microstimulation on the electrode-tissue interface.

Authors:  Kevin H Chen; John F Dammann; Jessica L Boback; Francesco V Tenore; Kevin J Otto; Robert A Gaunt; Sliman J Bensmaia
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2014-02-06       Impact factor: 5.379

Review 7.  Trends in cochlear implants.

Authors:  Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2004

8.  Decoding stimulus identity from multi-unit activity and local field potentials along the ventral auditory stream in the awake primate: implications for cortical neural prostheses.

Authors:  Elliot Smith; Spencer Kellis; Paul House; Bradley Greger
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2013-01-03       Impact factor: 5.379

9.  Development of surrogate spinal cords for the evaluation of electrode arrays used in intraspinal implants.

Authors:  Cheng Cheng; Jonn Kmech; Vivian K Mushahwar; Anastasia L Elias
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2013-01-23       Impact factor: 4.538

10.  Poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) as a Micro-Neural Interface Material for Electrostimulation.

Authors:  Seth J Wilks; Sarah M Richardson-Burns; Jeffrey L Hendricks; David C Martin; Kevin J Otto
Journal:  Front Neuroeng       Date:  2009-06-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.