Literature DB >> 24503702

The effect of chronic intracortical microstimulation on the electrode-tissue interface.

Kevin H Chen1, John F Dammann, Jessica L Boback, Francesco V Tenore, Kevin J Otto, Robert A Gaunt, Sliman J Bensmaia.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Somatosensation is critical for effective object manipulation, but current upper limb prostheses do not provide such feedback to the user. For individuals who require use of prosthetic limbs, this lack of feedback transforms a mundane task into one that requires extreme concentration and effort. Although vibrotactile motors and sensory substitution devices can be used to convey gross sensations, a direct neural interface is required to provide detailed and intuitive sensory feedback. The viability of intracortical microstimulation (ICMS) as a method to deliver feedback depends in part on the long-term reliability of implanted electrodes used to deliver the stimulation. The objective of the present study is to investigate the effects of chronic ICMS on the electrode-tissue interface. APPROACH: We stimulate the primary somatosensory cortex of three Rhesus macaques through chronically implanted electrodes for 4 h per day over a period of six months, with different electrodes subjected to different regimes of stimulation. We measure the impedance and voltage excursion as a function of time and of ICMS parameters. We also test the sensorimotor consequences of chronic ICMS by having animals grasp and manipulate small treats. MAIN
RESULTS: We show that impedance and voltage excursion both decay with time but stabilize after 10-12 weeks. The magnitude of this decay is dependent on the amplitude of the ICMS and, to a lesser degree, the duration of individual pulse trains. Furthermore, chronic ICMS does not produce any deficits in fine motor control. SIGNIFICANCE: The results suggest that chronic ICMS has only a minor effect on the electrode-tissue interface and may thus be a viable means to convey sensory feedback in neuroprosthetics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24503702      PMCID: PMC8129589          DOI: 10.1088/1741-2560/11/2/026004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neural Eng        ISSN: 1741-2552            Impact factor:   5.379


  41 in total

Review 1.  Sensory substitution in prosthetics.

Authors:  G Lundborg; B Rosén
Journal:  Hand Clin       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 1.907

2.  Chronic intracortical microstimulation (ICMS) of cat sensory cortex using the Utah Intracortical Electrode Array.

Authors:  P J Rousche; R A Normann
Journal:  IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng       Date:  1999-03

3.  Chronic neural recording using silicon-substrate microelectrode arrays implanted in cerebral cortex.

Authors:  Rio J Vetter; Justin C Williams; Jamille F Hetke; Elizabeth A Nunamaker; Daryl R Kipke
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 4.538

4.  Repeated voltage biasing improves unit recordings by reducing resistive tissue impedances.

Authors:  Matthew D Johnson; Kevin J Otto; Daryl R Kipke
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.802

5.  Complex impedance spectroscopy for monitoring tissue responses to inserted neural implants.

Authors:  Justin C Williams; Joseph A Hippensteel; John Dilgen; William Shain; Daryl R Kipke
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2007-11-27       Impact factor: 5.379

6.  Restoring the sense of touch with a prosthetic hand through a brain interface.

Authors:  Gregg A Tabot; John F Dammann; Joshua A Berg; Francesco V Tenore; Jessica L Boback; R Jacob Vogelstein; Sliman J Bensmaia
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-10-14       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Sputtered iridium oxide films (SIROFs) for low-impedance neural stimulation and recording electrodes.

Authors:  S F Cogan; T D Plante; J Ehrlich
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2004

8.  Electrical and physiological changes during short-term and chronic electrical stimulation of the normal cochlea.

Authors:  R Charlet de Sauvage; D Lima da Costa; J P Erre; J M Aran
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  The long-term effects of modified electrode surfaces and intracochlear corticosteroids on postoperative impedances in cochlear implant patients.

Authors:  Gerrit Paasche; Claudia Tasche; Timo Stöver; Anke Lesinski-Schiedat; Thomas Lenarz
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 2.311

10.  Active tactile exploration using a brain-machine-brain interface.

Authors:  Joseph E O'Doherty; Mikhail A Lebedev; Peter J Ifft; Katie Z Zhuang; Solaiman Shokur; Hannes Bleuler; Miguel A L Nicolelis
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2011-10-05       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  20 in total

1.  Behavioral assessment of sensitivity to intracortical microstimulation of primate somatosensory cortex.

Authors:  Sungshin Kim; Thierri Callier; Gregg A Tabot; Robert A Gaunt; Francesco V Tenore; Sliman J Bensmaia
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-10-26       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Electrodeposited platinum-iridium coating improves in vivo recording performance of chronically implanted microelectrode arrays.

Authors:  Isaac R Cassar; Chunxiu Yu; Jaydeep Sambangi; Curtis D Lee; John J Whalen; Artin Petrossians; Warren M Grill
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2019-03-18       Impact factor: 12.479

3.  Short reaction times in response to multi-electrode intracortical microstimulation may provide a basis for rapid movement-related feedback.

Authors:  Joseph T Sombeck; Lee E Miller
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 5.379

4.  The robo-pigeon based on the multiple brain regions synchronization implanted microelectrodes.

Authors:  Rui-Tuo Huai; Jun-Qing Yang; Hui Wang
Journal:  Bioengineered       Date:  2016-07-03       Impact factor: 3.269

5.  Differential Effects of Open- and Closed-Loop Intracortical Microstimulation on Firing Patterns of Neurons in Distant Cortical Areas.

Authors:  Alberto Averna; Valentina Pasquale; Maxwell D Murphy; Maria Piera Rogantin; Gustaf M Van Acker; Randolph J Nudo; Michela Chiappalone; David J Guggenmos
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2020-05-14       Impact factor: 5.357

6.  Chronic tissue response to untethered microelectrode implants in the rat brain and spinal cord.

Authors:  Ali Ersen; Stella Elkabes; David S Freedman; Mesut Sahin
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2015-01-21       Impact factor: 5.379

7.  A cognitive neuroprosthetic that uses cortical stimulation for somatosensory feedback.

Authors:  Christian Klaes; Ying Shi; Spencer Kellis; Juri Minxha; Boris Revechkis; Richard A Andersen
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2014-09-22       Impact factor: 5.379

Review 8.  Toward more versatile and intuitive cortical brain-machine interfaces.

Authors:  Richard A Andersen; Spencer Kellis; Christian Klaes; Tyson Aflalo
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2014-09-22       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 9.  Restoring tactile and proprioceptive sensation through a brain interface.

Authors:  Gregg A Tabot; Sung Shin Kim; Jeremy E Winberry; Sliman J Bensmaia
Journal:  Neurobiol Dis       Date:  2014-09-06       Impact factor: 5.996

10.  Long-term recording reliability of liquid crystal polymer µECoG arrays.

Authors:  Virginia Woods; Michael Trumpis; Brinnae Bent; Kay Palopoli-Trojani; Chia-Han Chiang; Charles Wang; Chunxiu Yu; Michele N Insanally; Robert C Froemke; Jonathan Viventi
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2018-09-24       Impact factor: 5.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.