Literature DB >> 21940444

Behavioral evidence for a glucose polymer taste receptor that is independent of the T1R2+3 heterodimer in a mouse model.

Yada Treesukosol1, Kimberly R Smith, Alan C Spector.   

Abstract

Although it is clear that the heterodimer formed by the T1R2 and T1R3 proteins serves as the primary taste receptor for sweeteners, there is growing evidence that responses to glucose polymers may be mediated by a different taste receptor. Here we report that although T1R2 knock-out (KO) and T1R3 KO mice displayed severely impaired responding to glucose, maltose, and maltotriose in an initial session of a brief-access taste test (5 s trials, 25 min sessions) relative to wild-type (WT) mice, they subsequently increased their licking as a function of concentration for maltose and maltotriose with continued testing, presumably due to associating weak oral cues with positive post-ingestive consequences. Interestingly, these KO mice displayed relatively normal concentration-dependent licking to Polycose, a mixture of glucose polymers, even in the first session. Importantly, the experience-dependent increase in responsiveness to the sugars observed with the T1R2 and T1R3 single KO mice was not statistically significant in the T1R2/3 double KO mice. The double KO mice, however, still displayed significant concentration-dependent responding to Polycose in the first test session, albeit lick rates were slightly lower than those seen for WT mice, perhaps because small amounts of glucose, maltose, and maltotriose found in Polycose were enhancing the signal in WT mice or because T1R2 or T1R3 can possibly heteromerize with another protein to form a fully functional glucose polymer receptor. These findings provide behavioral evidence that glucose polymers, with an optimal chain length greater than three glucose moieties, stimulate a taste receptor independent of the T1R2+3 heterodimer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21940444      PMCID: PMC3251913          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2179-11.2011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  43 in total

Review 1.  The history of the "Davis Rig".

Authors:  J C Smith
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.868

2.  Gut T1R3 sweet taste receptors do not mediate sucrose-conditioned flavor preferences in mice.

Authors:  Anthony Sclafani; Damien S Glass; Robert F Margolskee; John I Glendinning
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2010-10-06       Impact factor: 3.619

Review 3.  Receptors for bitter and sweet taste.

Authors:  Jean Pierre Montmayeur; Hiroaki Matsunami
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 6.627

4.  Tas1r3, encoding a new candidate taste receptor, is allelic to the sweet responsiveness locus Sac.

Authors:  M Max; Y G Shanker; L Huang; M Rong; Z Liu; F Campagne; H Weinstein; S Damak; R F Margolskee
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 38.330

5.  Molecular genetic identification of a candidate receptor gene for sweet taste.

Authors:  M Kitagawa; Y Kusakabe; H Miura; Y Ninomiya; A Hino
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  2001-04-27       Impact factor: 3.575

6.  Human receptors for sweet and umami taste.

Authors:  Xiaodong Li; Lena Staszewski; Hong Xu; Kyle Durick; Mark Zoller; Elliot Adler
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-03-26       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Positional cloning of the mouse saccharin preference (Sac) locus.

Authors:  A A Bachmanov; X Li; D R Reed; J D Ohmen; S Li; Z Chen; M G Tordoff; P J de Jong; C Wu; D B West; A Chatterjee; D A Ross; G K Beauchamp
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 3.160

8.  Mammalian sweet taste receptors.

Authors:  G Nelson; M A Hoon; J Chandrashekar; Y Zhang; N J Ryba; C S Zuker
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2001-08-10       Impact factor: 41.582

9.  Identification of a novel member of the T1R family of putative taste receptors.

Authors:  E Sainz; J N Korley; J F Battey; S L Sullivan
Journal:  J Neurochem       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 5.372

10.  A high-throughput screening procedure for identifying mice with aberrant taste and oromotor function.

Authors:  John I Glendinning; Jodi Gresack; Alan C Spector
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 3.160

View more
  36 in total

Review 1.  Role of gut nutrient sensing in stimulating appetite and conditioning food preferences.

Authors:  Anthony Sclafani; Karen Ackroff
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 3.619

2.  Orosensory detection of sucrose, maltose, and glucose is severely impaired in mice lacking T1R2 or T1R3, but Polycose sensitivity remains relatively normal.

Authors:  Yada Treesukosol; Alan C Spector
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 3.619

3.  CAST/EiJ and C57BL/6J Mice Differ in Their Oral and Postoral Attraction to Glucose and Fructose.

Authors:  Anthony Sclafani; Austin S Vural; Karen Ackroff
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 3.160

Review 4.  From appetite setpoint to appetition: 50years of ingestive behavior research.

Authors:  Anthony Sclafani
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2018-01-02

5.  An Examination of the Role of L-Glutamate and Inosine 5'-Monophosphate in Hedonic Taste-Guided Behavior by Mice Lacking the T1R1 + T1R3 Receptor.

Authors:  Ginger D Blonde; Alan C Spector
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 3.160

6.  Maltodextrin Acceptance and Preference in Eight Mouse Strains.

Authors:  Rachel L Poole; Tiffany R Aleman; Hillary T Ellis; Michael G Tordoff
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2015-10-12       Impact factor: 3.160

7.  Behavioral analyses of taste function and ingestion in rodent models.

Authors:  Alan C Spector
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2015-04-16

8.  Development of leptin resistance in sucrose drinking rats is associated with consuming carbohydrate-containing solutions and not calorie-free sweet solution.

Authors:  Ruth B S Harris
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2018-10-11       Impact factor: 3.868

9.  Maltodextrin and sucrose preferences in sweet-sensitive (C57BL/6J) and subsensitive (129P3/J) mice revisited.

Authors:  Karen Ackroff; Anthony Sclafani
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2016-08-12

10.  Overexpression of neuropeptide Y in the dorsomedial hypothalamus increases trial initiation but does not significantly alter concentration-dependent licking to sucrose in a brief-access taste test.

Authors:  Yada Treesukosol; Sheng Bi; Timothy H Moran
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2013-01-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.