Limitations of using micro-computed tomography to predict bone-implant contact and mechanical fixation.

Fixation of metallic implants to bone through osseointegration is important in orthopaedics and dentistry. Model systems for studying this phenomenon would benefit from a non-destructive imaging modality so that mechanical and morphological endpoints can more readily be examined in the same specimens. The purpose of this study was to assess the utility of an automated microcomputed tomography (μCT) program for predicting bone-implant contact (BIC) and mechanical fixation strength in a rat model. Femurs in which 1.5-mm-diameter titanium implants had been in place for 4 weeks were either embedded in polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) for preparation of 1-mm-thick cross-sectional slabs (16 femurs: 32 slabs) or were used for mechanical implant pull-out testing (n= 18 femurs). All samples were scanned by μCT at 70 kVp with 16 μm voxels and assessed by the manufacturer's software for assessing 'osseointegration volume per total volume' (OV/TV). OV/TV measures bone volume per total volume (BV/TV) in a 3-voxel-thick ring that by default excludes the 3 voxels immediately adjacent to the implant to avoid metal-induced artefacts. The plastic-embedded samples were also analysed by backscatter scanning electron microscopy (bSEM) to provide a direct comparison of OV/TV with a well-accepted technique for BIC. In μCT images in which the implant was directly embedded within PMMA, there was a zone of elevated attenuation (>50% of the attenuation value used to segment bone from marrow) which extended 48 μm away from the implant surface. Comparison of the bSEM and μCT images showed high correlations for BV/TV measurements in areas not affected by metal-induced artefacts. In addition for bSEM images, we found that there were high correlations between peri-implant BV/TV within 12 μm of the implant surface and BIC (correlation coefficients ≥0.8, p < 0.05). OV/TV as measured on μCT images was not significantly correlated with BIC as measured on the corresponding bSEM images. However, OV/TV was significantly, but weakly, correlated with implant pull-out strength (r= 0.401, p= 0.049) and energy to failure (r= 0.435, p= 0.035). Thus, the need for the 48-μm-thick exclusion zone in the OV/TV program to avoid metal-induced artefacts with the scanner used in this study means that it is not possible to make bone measurements sufficiently close to the implant surface to obtain an accurate assessment of BIC. Current generation laboratory-based μCT scanners typically have voxel sizes of 6-8 μm or larger which will still not overcome this limitation. Thus, peri-implant bone measurements at these resolutions should only be used as a guide to predict implant fixation and should not be over-interpreted as a measurement of BIC. Newer generation laboratory-based μCT scanners have several improvements including better spatial resolution and X-ray sources and appear to have less severe metal-induced artefacts, but will need appropriate validation as they become available to researchers. Regardless of the μCT scanner being used, we recommend that detailed validation studies be performed for any study using metal implants because variation in the composition and geometry of the particular implants used may lead to different artefact patterns.