Literature DB >> 28851105

Optimizing a micro-computed tomography-based surrogate measurement of bone-implant contact.

Matthew J Meagher1, Rachna N Parwani1,2,3, Amarjit S Virdi1, Dale R Sumner1.   

Abstract

Histology and backscatter scanning electron microscopy (bSEM) are the current gold standard methods for quantifying bone-implant contact (BIC), but are inherently destructive. Microcomputed tomography (μCT) is a non-destructive alternative, but attempts to validate μCT-based assessment of BIC in animal models have produced conflicting results. We previously showed in a rat model using a 1.5 mm diameter titanium implant that the extent of the metal-induced artefact precluded accurate measurement of bone sufficiently close to the interface to assess BIC. Recently introduced commercial laboratory μCT scanners have smaller voxels and improved imaging capabilities, possibly overcoming this limitation. The goals of the present study were to establish an approach for optimizing μCT imaging parameters and to validate μCT-based assessment of BIC. In an empirical parametric study using a 1.5 mm diameter titanium implant, we determined 90 kVp, 88 µA, 1.5 μm isotropic voxel size, 1600 projections/180°, and 750 ms integration time to be optimal. Using specimens from an in vivo rat experiment, we found significant correlations between bSEM and μCT for BIC with the manufacturer's automated analysis routine (r = 0.716, p = 0.003) or a line-intercept method (r = 0.797, p = 0.010). Thus, this newer generation scanner's improved imaging capability reduced the extent of the metal-induced artefact zone enough to permit assessment of BIC.
© 2017 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 36:979-986, 2018. © 2017 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bone-implant contact; metal artefact; microCT; osseointegration

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28851105      PMCID: PMC5832531          DOI: 10.1002/jor.23716

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Res        ISSN: 0736-0266            Impact factor:   3.494


  23 in total

1.  A new microtomographic technique for non-invasive evaluation of the bone structure around implants.

Authors:  L Sennerby; A Wennerberg; F Pasop
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 5.977

2.  Bone turnover markers correlate with implant fixation in a rat model using LPS-doped particles to induced implant loosening.

Authors:  Shuo Liu; Amarjit S Virdi; Kotaro Sena; W Frank Hughes; Dale R Sumner
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2012-01-24       Impact factor: 4.396

3.  Correlation between microtomography and histomorphometry for assessment of implant osseointegration.

Authors:  Young-Seok Park; Ki-Young Yi; In-Seop Lee; Young-Chul Jung
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 5.977

4.  Validation of microfocus computed tomography in the evaluation of bone implant specimens.

Authors:  Nele Stoppie; Jan-Paul van der Waerden; John A Jansen; Joke Duyck; Martine Wevers; Ignace E Naert
Journal:  Clin Implant Dent Relat Res       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.932

5.  Tensile tests of interface between bone and plasma-sprayed HA coating-titanium implant.

Authors:  H Lin; H Xu; X Zhang; K de Groot
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  1998

6.  Limitations of using micro-computed tomography to predict bone-implant contact and mechanical fixation.

Authors:  S Liu; J Broucek; A S Virdi; D R Sumner
Journal:  J Microsc       Date:  2011-09-15       Impact factor: 1.758

7.  Osseointegration of Ti6Al4V alloy implants coated with titanium nitride by a new method.

Authors:  G Sovak; A Weiss; I Gotman
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2000-03

8.  Osseointegrated titanium implants. Requirements for ensuring a long-lasting, direct bone-to-implant anchorage in man.

Authors:  T Albrektsson; P I Brånemark; H A Hansson; J Lindström
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1981

9.  Endosseous implant anchorage is critically dependent on mechanostructural determinants of peri-implant bone trabeculae.

Authors:  Yankel Gabet; David Kohavi; Romain Voide; Thomas L Mueller; Ralph Müller; Itai Bab
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 6.741

10.  Utilizing micro-computed tomography to evaluate bone structure surrounding dental implants: a comparison with histomorphometry.

Authors:  Stefan Vandeweghe; Paulo G Coelho; Christian Vanhove; Ann Wennerberg; Ryo Jimbo
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater       Date:  2013-05-10       Impact factor: 3.368

View more
  7 in total

1.  Early changes in serum osteocalcin and body weight are predictive of implant fixation in a rat model of implant loosening.

Authors:  Brittany M Wilson; Meghan M Moran; Matthew J Meagher; Ryan D Ross; Maleeha Mashiatulla; Amarjit S Virdi; Dale R Sumner
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2019-12-25       Impact factor: 3.494

2.  Implant surface alters compartmental-specific contributions to fixation strength in rats.

Authors:  Frank C Ko; Matthew J Meagher; Maleeha Mashiatulla; Ryan D Ross; Amarjit S Virdi; Dale R Sumner
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2019-12-25       Impact factor: 3.494

Review 3.  A multiscale analytical approach to evaluate osseointegration.

Authors:  Anders Palmquist
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2018-05-07       Impact factor: 3.896

4.  An In Vivo Study in Rat Femurs of Bioactive Silicate Coatings on Titanium Dental Implants.

Authors:  Giulia Brunello; Lisa Biasetto; Hamada Elsayed; Elia Sbettega; Chiara Gardin; Anna Scanu; Simone Carmignato; Barbara Zavan; Stefano Sivolella
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-04-29       Impact factor: 4.241

5.  Acquisition of Quasi-Monochromatic Dual-Energy in a Microfocus X-ray Generator and Development of Applied Technology.

Authors:  Hiroaki Hasegawa; Masanori Sato
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2019-03-04

6.  Comparison of three-dimensional digital analyses and two-dimensional histomorphometric analyses of the bone-implant interface.

Authors:  Jeong-Min Hong; Ung-Gyu Kim; In-Sung Luke Yeo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-10-14       Impact factor: 3.752

7.  The relative contribution of bone microarchitecture and matrix composition to implant fixation strength in rats.

Authors:  Kyle D Anderson; Frank C Ko; Spencer Fullam; Amarjit S Virdi; Markus A Wimmer; Dale R Sumner; Ryan D Ross
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2021-06-06       Impact factor: 3.494

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.