Literature DB >> 8291405

Histology of porous-coated acetabular components. 25 cementless cups retrieved after arthroplasty.

D R Sumner1, M Jasty, J J Jacobs, R M Urban, C R Bragdon, W H Harris, J O Galante.   

Abstract

25 hemispherical acetabular components retrieved from patients who had a total hip arthroplasty (THA) were studied histologically. All of the components had titanium fiber metal porous coatings and were implanted with adjuvant screw fixation, 18 in primary THA and 7 in revision THA. None of the cups had been removed because of infection or failure of fixation. The components had been in place an average of 30 (1-140) weeks. 18 cups had bone ingrowth into the porous coating. Up to one third of the available void space within the porous coating was occupied by bone, while the maximal proportion of the area of the bone-implant interface with bone ingrowth was over 80 percent. Bone ingrowth was more often observed at the dome and in the vicinity of sites of screw fixation than elsewhere. Peripherally, bone ingrowth was less consistent, and in isolated areas fibrocartilage and mineralized fibrocartilage were occasionally observed. The longer-term cases had more bone ingrowth than the shorter-term cases. Apparent metallic debris was observed within histiocytes adjacent to screw holes, and the amount of this material increased with duration of implantation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8291405     DOI: 10.3109/17453679308994584

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand        ISSN: 0001-6470


  8 in total

1.  Metropolitan and micropolitan statistical area estimates of depression and anxiety using the Patient Health Questionnaire-8 in the 2006 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System.

Authors:  Tara W Strine; Satvinder S Dhingra; Kurt Kroenke; Mohamed Qayad; James L Ribble; Catherine A Okoro; Lina S Balluz; Shanta R Dube; James Lando; Ali H Mokdad
Journal:  Int J Public Health       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 3.380

2.  [Reconstruction of large acetabular defects using trabecular metal augments].

Authors:  Olaf Hasart; Carsten Perka; Rex Lehnigk; Stephan Tohtz
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 1.154

3.  Intramembranous bone regeneration and implant placement using mechanical femoral marrow ablation: rodent models.

Authors:  Meghan M Moran; Kotaro Sena; Margaret A McNulty; D R Sumner; Amarjit S Virdi
Journal:  Bonekey Rep       Date:  2016-09-07

4.  Fortifying the Bone-Implant Interface Part 2: An In Vivo Evaluation of 3D-Printed and TPS-Coated Triangular Implants.

Authors:  Regina F MacBarb; Derek P Lindsey; Shane A Woods; Peggy A Lalor; Mukund I Gundanna; Scott A Yerby
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2017-06-01

5.  Is There A Difference in Bone Ingrowth in Modular Versus Monoblock Porous Tantalum Tibial Trays?

Authors:  Josa A Hanzlik; Judd S Day; Clare M Rimnac; Steven M Kurtz
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2015-01-22       Impact factor: 4.757

6.  Limitations of using micro-computed tomography to predict bone-implant contact and mechanical fixation.

Authors:  S Liu; J Broucek; A S Virdi; D R Sumner
Journal:  J Microsc       Date:  2011-09-15       Impact factor: 1.758

7.  Successful long-term fixation and progression of osteolysis associated with first-generation cementless acetabular components retrieved post mortem.

Authors:  Robert M Urban; Deborah J Hall; Craig Della Valle; Markus A Wimmer; Joshua J Jacobs; Jorge O Galante
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2012-10-17       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Bone ingrowth in well-fixed retrieved porous tantalum implants.

Authors:  Josa A Hanzlik; Judd S Day
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2013-03-18       Impact factor: 4.757

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.