Literature DB >> 33973645

Osseointegration of a novel 3D porous Ti-6Al-4V implant material - Histomorphometric analysis in rabbits.

Stephan Frosch1, Gottfried Buchhorn2, Sebastian Krohn3, Wolfgang Lehmann2, Karl-Heinz Frosch4, László Füzesi5, Alice Frosch2.   

Abstract

Porous structure properties are known to conduct initial and long-term stability of titanium alloy implants. This study aims to assess the histomorphometric effect of a 3-D porosity in Ti-6Al-4V implants (PI) on osseointegration in comparison to solid Ti-6Al-4V implants (SI). The PI was produced in a spaceholder method and sintering and has a pore size of mean 400 µm (50 µm to 500 µm) and mimics human trabecular bone. Pairs of PI and equal sized SI as reference were bilaterally implanted at random in the lateral femoral condyle of 16 Chinchilla-Bastard rabbits. The animals were sacrificed after 4 and 12 weeks for histomorphometric analysis. The histomorphometric evaluation confirmed a successful short-term osseohealing (4 weeks) and mid-term osseoremodeling (12 weeks) for both types of implants. The total newly formed bone area was larger for PI than for SI after 4 and 12 weeks, with the intraporous bone area being accountable for the significant difference (p<0.05). A more detailed observation of bone area distribution revealed a bony accumulation in a radius of +/- 500 µm around the implant surface after remodeling. The bone-to-implant contact (BIC) increased significantly (p<0.05) from 4 to 12 weeks (PI 26.23 % to 42.68 %; SI 28.44 % to 47.47 %) for both types of implants. Due to different surface properties, however, PI had a significant (p<0.05) larger absolute osseous contact (mm) to the implant circumference compared to the SI (4 weeks: 7.46 mm vs 5.72 mm; 12 weeks: 11.57 mm vs 9.52 mm [PI vs. SI]). The regional influences (trabecular vs. cortical) on bone formation and the intraporous distribution were also presented. Conclusively, the porous structure and surface properties of PI enable a successful and regular osseointegration and enhance the bony fixation compared to solid implants under experimental conditions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33973645     DOI: 10.14670/HH-18-342

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Histol Histopathol        ISSN: 0213-3911            Impact factor:   2.303


  43 in total

Review 1.  Biological basis of bone formation, remodeling, and repair-part III: biomechanical forces.

Authors:  Alexander C Allori; Alexander M Sailon; Jenny H Pan; Stephen M Warren
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 6.389

2.  Comparative in vivo evaluation of porous and dense duplex titanium and hydroxyapatite coating with high roughnesses in different implantation environments.

Authors:  V Borsari; M Fini; G Giavaresi; M Tschon; R Chiesa; L Chiusoli; A Salito; L Rimondini; R Giardino
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 4.396

Review 3.  On osseointegration in relation to implant surfaces.

Authors:  Tomas Albrektsson; Ann Wennerberg
Journal:  Clin Implant Dent Relat Res       Date:  2019-02-28       Impact factor: 3.932

4.  Osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Experience from a 10-year period.

Authors:  P I Brånemark; B O Hansson; R Adell; U Breine; J Lindström; O Hallén; A Ohman
Journal:  Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Suppl       Date:  1977

5.  The optimum pore size for the fixation of porous-surfaced metal implants by the ingrowth of bone.

Authors:  J D Bobyn; R M Pilliar; H U Cameron; G C Weatherly
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1980 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Comparison of bone-implant contact and bone-implant volume between 2D-histological sections and 3D-SRµCT slices.

Authors:  Ricardo Bernhardt; Eberhard Kuhlisch; Matthias C Schulz; Uwe Eckelt; Bernd Stadlinger
Journal:  Eur Cell Mater       Date:  2012-04-10       Impact factor: 3.942

7.  Osseointegrated titanium implants. Requirements for ensuring a long-lasting, direct bone-to-implant anchorage in man.

Authors:  T Albrektsson; P I Brånemark; H A Hansson; J Lindström
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1981

Review 8.  Development and applications of porous tantalum trabecular metal-enhanced titanium dental implants.

Authors:  Sompop Bencharit; Warren C Byrd; Sandra Altarawneh; Bashir Hosseini; Austin Leong; Glenn Reside; Thiago Morelli; Steven Offenbacher
Journal:  Clin Implant Dent Relat Res       Date:  2013-03-25       Impact factor: 3.932

9.  Foreign body reactions, marginal bone loss and allergies in relation to titanium implants.

Authors:  Tomas Albrektsson; Bruno Chrcanovic; Johan Mölne; Ann Wennerberg
Journal:  Eur J Oral Implantol       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 3.123

10.  Mechanical Characterisation and Biomechanical and Biological Behaviours of Ti-Zr Binary-Alloy Dental Implants.

Authors:  Aritza Brizuela-Velasco; Esteban Pérez-Pevida; Antonio Jiménez-Garrudo; Francisco Javier Gil-Mur; José María Manero; Miquel Punset-Fuste; David Chávarri-Prado; Markel Diéguez-Pereira; Francesca Monticelli
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-11-29       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.