Literature DB >> 21901499

A pre-visit tailored website enhances counselees' realistic expectations and knowledge and fulfils information needs for breast cancer genetic counselling.

Akke Albada1, Sandra van Dulmen, Dick Lindhout, Jozien M Bensing, Margreet G E M Ausems.   

Abstract

Counselees who are the first in their family to request breast cancer genetic counselling often don't know what to expect or have unrealistic expectations of genetic counselling. Receiving tailored information might help them to prepare for their first visit. We conducted a study of the effects of a pre-visit website providing computer-tailored information (E-info gene(ca)), on counselees' expectations, knowledge about breast cancer and heredity and information needs. Counselees were randomized to receive usual care (UC) or UC plus website. All counselees completed a baseline questionnaire and those randomized to the intervention group also completed a questionnaire after having viewed the website. After having accessed E-info gene(ca) counselees (n = 101) better knew what to expect of their first visit (χ(2) = 4.43; P = .04) and less often showed unrealistic expectations about possibilities for DNA-testing (χ(2) = 4.84; P = .03) than counselees in the UC group (n = 89). In addition, the website increased counselees' knowledge of breast cancer and heredity (B = .23; P = .003) and lowered their information needs (B = -.16; P = .000) compared to the UC group. Especially, information concerning procedural aspects and emotional consequences of genetic counselling was considered less important. This study showed that counselees know more and need less when they are provided with extended pre-visit information through a tailored website and counselees enter the visit with more realistic expectations of genetic counselling. This might facilitate and focus communication within the subsequent consultation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 21901499     DOI: 10.1007/s10689-011-9479-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fam Cancer        ISSN: 1389-9600            Impact factor:   2.375


  54 in total

1.  Comparison of imputation and modelling methods in the analysis of a physical activity trial with missing outcomes.

Authors:  Angela M Wood; Ian R White; Melvyn Hillsdon; James Carpenter
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2004-08-27       Impact factor: 7.196

2.  Use and evaluation of an individually tailored website for counselees prior to breast cancer genetic counseling.

Authors:  Akke Albada; Margreet G E M Ausems; Roel Otten; Jozien M Bensing; Sandra van Dulmen
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 2.037

3.  The impact of a computer-tailored nutrition intervention.

Authors:  J Brug; I Steenhuis; P van Assema; H de Vries
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  1996 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.018

4.  Psychosocial impact of the lack of information given at referral about familial risk for cancer.

Authors:  Alison Metcalfe; Julie Werrett; Lucy Burgess; Collette Clifford
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 3.894

5.  Decision making with uncertain information: learning from women in a high risk breast cancer clinic.

Authors:  Caren J Frost; Vickie Venne; Dianne Cunningham; Ruth Gerritsen-McKane
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  Internet usage among women with breast cancer: an exploratory study.

Authors:  J L Pereira; S Koski; J Hanson; E D Bruera; J R Mackey
Journal:  Clin Breast Cancer       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Cancer genetic predisposition: information needs of patients irrespective of risk level.

Authors:  Alison Metcalfe; Julie Werrett; Lucy Burgess; Cyril Chapman; Collette Clifford
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2009-06-11       Impact factor: 2.375

8.  Improving dietary behavior: the effectiveness of tailored messages in primary care settings.

Authors:  M K Campbell; B M DeVellis; V J Strecher; A S Ammerman; R F DeVellis; R S Sandler
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 9.  The effectiveness of Web-based vs. non-Web-based interventions: a meta-analysis of behavioral change outcomes.

Authors:  Dean J Wantland; Carmen J Portillo; William L Holzemer; Rob Slaughter; Eva M McGhee
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2004-11-10       Impact factor: 5.428

10.  Knowledge and attitudes towards genetic testing: a two year follow-up study in patients with asthma, diabetes mellitus and cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  Hiske Calsbeek; Mattijn Morren; Jozien Bensing; Mieke Rijken
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2007-02-23       Impact factor: 2.537

View more
  14 in total

1.  Does and should breast cancer genetic counselling include lifestyle advice?

Authors:  Akke Albada; Madelèn Vernooij; Liesbeth van Osch; Anouk Pijpe; Sandra van Dulmen; Margreet G E M Ausems
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 2.375

2.  "If It Helps, It's Worth a Try": an Investigation of Perceptions and Attitudes about Genetic Counseling among Southern Manitoba Hutterites.

Authors:  Amber P Gemmell; Patricia McCarthy Veach; Ian MacFarlane; Rachel Riesgraf; Bonnie S LeRoy
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2017-06-14       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  Who is being referred to cancer genetic counseling? Characteristics of counselees and their referral.

Authors:  E van Riel; S van Dulmen; M G E M Ausems
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2012-03-17

4.  Operationalizing the Reciprocal Engagement Model of Genetic Counseling Practice: a Framework for the Scalable Delivery of Genomic Counseling and Testing.

Authors:  Tara Schmidlen; Amy C Sturm; Shelly Hovick; Laura Scheinfeldt; J Scott Roberts; Lindsey Morr; Joseph McElroy; Amanda E Toland; Michael Christman; Julianne M O'Daniel; Erynn S Gordon; Barbara A Bernhardt; Kelly E Ormond; Kevin Sweet
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2018-02-19       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  Online Module for Carrier Screening in Ashkenazi Jewish Individuals Compared with In-Person Genetics Education: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Chia Wei Fan; Lysanne Castonguay; Sonja Rummell; Sébastien Lévesque; John J Mitchell; Guillaume Sillon
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2017-08-09       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 6.  Interventions to reach underscreened populations: a narrative review for planning cancer screening initiatives.

Authors:  Mavis Jones; Brenda Ross; Alyssa Cloth; Laura Heller
Journal:  Int J Public Health       Date:  2015-02-25       Impact factor: 3.380

7.  Perceptions of Latinas on the Traditional Prenatal Genetic Counseling Model.

Authors:  Stephanie Thompson; Sarah Jane Noblin; Jennifer Lemons; Susan K Peterson; Carlos Carreno; Andrea Harbison
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2014-12-05       Impact factor: 2.537

8.  Awareness of genetic counseling and perceptions of its purpose: a survey of the Canadian public.

Authors:  Melissa Maio; Prescilla Carrion; Elyse Yaremco; Jehannine C Austin
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-08-21       Impact factor: 2.537

9.  Applied techniques for putting pre-visit planning in clinical practice to empower patient-centered care in the pandemic era: a systematic review and framework suggestion.

Authors:  Marsa Gholamzadeh; Hamidreza Abtahi; Marjan Ghazisaeeidi
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 2.655

10.  Patient-reported healthcare expectations in inflammatory bowel diseases.

Authors:  Valérie Pittet; Carla Vaucher; Florian Froehlich; Michel H Maillard; Pierre Michetti
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-05-17       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.