Literature DB >> 29460110

Operationalizing the Reciprocal Engagement Model of Genetic Counseling Practice: a Framework for the Scalable Delivery of Genomic Counseling and Testing.

Tara Schmidlen1,2, Amy C Sturm1,3, Shelly Hovick4, Laura Scheinfeldt2, J Scott Roberts5, Lindsey Morr4, Joseph McElroy6, Amanda E Toland3, Michael Christman2, Julianne M O'Daniel7, Erynn S Gordon2,8, Barbara A Bernhardt9, Kelly E Ormond10, Kevin Sweet11.   

Abstract

With the advent of widespread genomic testing for diagnostic indications and disease risk assessment, there is increased need to optimize genetic counseling services to support the scalable delivery of precision medicine. Here, we describe how we operationalized the reciprocal engagement model of genetic counseling practice to develop a framework of counseling components and strategies for the delivery of genomic results. This framework was constructed based upon qualitative research with patients receiving genomic counseling following online receipt of potentially actionable complex disease and pharmacogenomics reports. Consultation with a transdisciplinary group of investigators, including practicing genetic counselors, was sought to ensure broad scope and applicability of these strategies for use with any large-scale genomic testing effort. We preserve the provision of pre-test education and informed consent as established in Mendelian/single-gene disease genetic counseling practice. Following receipt of genomic results, patients are afforded the opportunity to tailor the counseling agenda by selecting the specific test results they wish to discuss, specifying questions for discussion, and indicating their preference for counseling modality. The genetic counselor uses these patient preferences to set the genomic counseling session and to personalize result communication and risk reduction recommendations. Tailored visual aids and result summary reports divide areas of risk (genetic variant, family history, lifestyle) for each disease to facilitate discussion of multiple disease risks. Post-counseling, session summary reports are actively routed to both the patient and their physician team to encourage review and follow-up. Given the breadth of genomic information potentially resulting from genomic testing, this framework is put forth as a starting point to meet the need for scalable genetic counseling services in the delivery of precision medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Genetic counseling; Genomic counseling; Genomic testing; Genomics; Modality; Precision medicine; Service delivery

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29460110      PMCID: PMC6098987          DOI: 10.1007/s10897-018-0230-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Genet Couns        ISSN: 1059-7700            Impact factor:   2.537


  83 in total

1.  The prospect of genome-guided preventive medicine: a need and opportunity for genetic counselors.

Authors:  Julianne M O'Daniel
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2010-05-04       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  A new definition of Genetic Counseling: National Society of Genetic Counselors' Task Force report.

Authors:  Robert Resta; Barbara Bowles Biesecker; Robin L Bennett; Sandra Blum; Susan Estabrooks Hahn; Michelle N Strecker; Janet L Williams
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  Delivery of Internet-based cancer genetic counselling services to patients' homes: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Neal J Meropol; Mary B Daly; Hetal S Vig; Frank J Manion; Sharon L Manne; Carla Mazar; Camara Murphy; Nicholas Solarino; Vadim Zubarev
Journal:  J Telemed Telecare       Date:  2010-11-19       Impact factor: 6.184

4.  Coming full circle: a reciprocal-engagement model of genetic counseling practice.

Authors:  Patricia McCarthy Veach; Dianne M Bartels; Bonnie S Leroy
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2007-10-13       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  Our new "social" communication age in health.

Authors:  Scott C Ratzan
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2011-09

6.  Experiences with obtaining informed consent for genomic sequencing.

Authors:  Barbara A Bernhardt; Myra I Roche; Denise L Perry; Sarah R Scollon; Ashley N Tomlinson; Debra Skinner
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2015-07-21       Impact factor: 2.802

7.  Genetic risk estimation in the Coriell Personalized Medicine Collaborative.

Authors:  Catharine B Stack; Neda Gharani; Erynn S Gordon; Tara Schmidlen; Michael F Christman; Margaret A Keller
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 8.822

8.  Genomic Testing: a Genetic Counselor's Personal Reflection on Three Years of Consenting and Testing.

Authors:  Julia Wynn
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2015-08-05       Impact factor: 2.537

9.  Recommendations for reporting of secondary findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing, 2016 update (ACMG SF v2.0): a policy statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics.

Authors:  Sarah S Kalia; Kathy Adelman; Sherri J Bale; Wendy K Chung; Christine Eng; James P Evans; Gail E Herman; Sophia B Hufnagel; Teri E Klein; Bruce R Korf; Kent D McKelvey; Kelly E Ormond; C Sue Richards; Christopher N Vlangos; Michael Watson; Christa L Martin; David T Miller
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2016-11-17       Impact factor: 8.822

Review 10.  We screen newborns, don't we?: realizing the promise of public health genomics.

Authors:  James P Evans; Jonathan S Berg; Andrew F Olshan; Terry Magnuson; Barbara K Rimer
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2013-03-07       Impact factor: 8.822

View more
  8 in total

1.  The Contribution of the Reciprocal-Engagement Model as a Theoretical Framework of a Portuguese Scale for Quality Assessment of Genetic Counseling.

Authors:  C Costa; M S Lemos; Milena Paneque
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2018-06-25       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Factors affecting breast cancer patients' need for genetic risk information: From information insufficiency to information need.

Authors:  Soo Jung Hong; Barbara Biesecker; Jennifer Ivanovich; Melody Goodman; Kimberly A Kaphingst
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2019-01-24       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  Should pretest genetic counselling be required for patients pursuing genomic sequencing? Results from a survey of participants in a large genomic implementation study.

Authors:  Joel E Pacyna; Carmen Radecki Breitkopf; Sarah M Jenkins; Erica J Sutton; Caroline Horrow; Iftikhar J Kullo; Richard R Sharp
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2018-12-22       Impact factor: 6.318

4.  The role of digital tools in the delivery of genomic medicine: enhancing patient-centered care.

Authors:  Salma Shickh; Sara A Rafferty; Marc Clausen; Rita Kodida; Chloe Mighton; Seema Panchal; Justin Lorentz; Thomas Ward; Nicholas Watkins; Christine Elser; Andrea Eisen; June C Carroll; Emily Glogowski; Kasmintan A Schrader; Jordan Lerner-Ellis; Raymond H Kim; David Chitayat; Cheryl Shuman; Yvonne Bombard
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2021-03-02       Impact factor: 8.864

Review 5.  Personalized Medicine Implementation with Non-traditional Data Sources: A Conceptual Framework and Survey of the Literature.

Authors:  Casey Overby Taylor; Peter Tarczy-Hornoch
Journal:  Yearb Med Inform       Date:  2019-08-16

6.  Application of a framework to guide genetic testing communication across clinical indications.

Authors:  Miranda L G Hallquist; Eric P Tricou; Kelly E Ormond; Juliann M Savatt; Curtis R Coughlin; W Andrew Faucett; Laura Hercher; Howard P Levy; Julianne M O'Daniel; Holly L Peay; Melissa Stosic; Maureen Smith; Wendy R Uhlmann; Hannah Wand; Karen E Wain; Adam H Buchanan
Journal:  Genome Med       Date:  2021-04-29       Impact factor: 11.117

7.  Clinical application of a scale to assess genomic healthcare empowerment (GEmS): Process and illustrative case examples.

Authors:  Allyn McConkie-Rosell; Kelly Schoch; Jennifer Sullivan; Rebecca C Spillmann; Heidi Cope; Queenie K-G Tan; Christina G S Palmer; Stephen R Hooper; Vandana Shashi
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2021-06-11       Impact factor: 2.537

8.  Early Outcome Data Assessing Utility of a Post-Test Genomic Counseling Framework for the Scalable Delivery of Precision Health.

Authors:  Amy C Sturm; Tara Schmidlen; Laura Scheinfeldt; Shelly Hovick; Joseph P McElroy; Amanda E Toland; J Scott Roberts; Kevin Sweet
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2018-07-25
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.