Literature DB >> 21533850

Use and evaluation of an individually tailored website for counselees prior to breast cancer genetic counseling.

Akke Albada1, Margreet G E M Ausems, Roel Otten, Jozien M Bensing, Sandra van Dulmen.   

Abstract

This article explores the use and evaluation of a pre-visit website which aims to prepare counselees who are the first in their family to request breast cancer genetic counseling. This website E-info gene(ca) provides computer-tailored information and a blank question prompt sheet (QPS) on which counselees can formulate their questions for the consultation. The objectives of this study are: first, to assess which factors influence the use of E-info gene(ca), including the duration of site and page views, the influence of topic sequence in the menu bar on the sequence of page views, and the relation between website use and the use of the QPS; second, to explore counselees' evaluations of E-info gene(ca) and relations with counselee characteristics. User statistics were analyzed to describe duration of site and page views. Multivariate analyses were used to predict duration of web and page views, sequence of page views, QPS use, and site evaluations. Independent variables were sociodemographic background, disease status, psychological functioning, and information needs. All 101 counselees who were provided with a login accessed the website and spent, on average, 21 min viewing the website. Counselees affected with breast cancer spent more time on the website than unaffected counselees. Half of all page views were within the sequence of topics in the menu and older counselees, and those who made less use of the internet more often navigated according to the menu sequence than others. Having viewed information about why it is important to ask questions increased QPS use. Counselees who had higher information needs considered the information more helpful. This hospital-provided website for breast cancer genetic counselees was accessible and was evaluated positively, even concerning older counselees and those who had not searched the internet for information about hereditary cancer. Counselees might navigate hospital-provided websites more in line with the sequence of topics in the menu bar, than generally accessible health websites.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21533850     DOI: 10.1007/s13187-011-0227-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cancer Educ        ISSN: 0885-8195            Impact factor:   2.037


  48 in total

1.  Can a "prompt list" empower cancer patients to ask relevant questions?

Authors:  Aneta Dimoska; Martin H N Tattersall; Phyllis N Butow; Heather Shepherd; Paul Kinnersley
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2008-07-15       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Psychosocial impact of the lack of information given at referral about familial risk for cancer.

Authors:  Alison Metcalfe; Julie Werrett; Lucy Burgess; Collette Clifford
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 3.894

3.  An interactive computer program can effectively educate patients about genetic testing for breast cancer susceptibility.

Authors:  M J Green; B B Biesecker; A M McInerney; D Mauger; N Fost
Journal:  Am J Med Genet       Date:  2001-09-15

Review 4.  Review of computer-generated outpatient health behavior interventions: clinical encounters "in absentia".

Authors:  D Revere; P J Dunbar
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2001 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 5.  Past, present, and future of computer-tailored nutrition education.

Authors:  Johannes Brug; Anke Oenema; Marci Campbell
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 7.045

6.  Internet usage among women with breast cancer: an exploratory study.

Authors:  J L Pereira; S Koski; J Hanson; E D Bruera; J R Mackey
Journal:  Clin Breast Cancer       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Cancer consultation preparation package: changing patients but not physicians is not enough.

Authors:  Phyllis Butow; Rhonda Devine; Michael Boyer; Susan Pendlebury; Michael Jackson; Martin H N Tattersall
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2004-11-01       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Next generation of self-management education: Web-based bipolar disorder program.

Authors:  Judith Proudfoot; Gordon Parker; Matthew Hyett; Vijaya Manicavasagar; Meg Smith; Sue Grdovic; Leah Greenfield
Journal:  Aust N Z J Psychiatry       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 5.744

Review 9.  The effectiveness of Web-based vs. non-Web-based interventions: a meta-analysis of behavioral change outcomes.

Authors:  Dean J Wantland; Carmen J Portillo; William L Holzemer; Rob Slaughter; Eva M McGhee
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2004-11-10       Impact factor: 5.428

10.  Communication in cancer genetic counselling: does it reflect counselees' previsit needs and preferences?

Authors:  A H Pieterse; A M van Dulmen; M G E M Ausems; F A Beemer; J M Bensing
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2005-05-09       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  9 in total

1.  A pre-visit tailored website enhances counselees' realistic expectations and knowledge and fulfils information needs for breast cancer genetic counselling.

Authors:  Akke Albada; Sandra van Dulmen; Dick Lindhout; Jozien M Bensing; Margreet G E M Ausems
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 2.375

Review 2.  Digital health-enabled genomics: Opportunities and challenges.

Authors:  Yvonne Bombard; Geoffrey S Ginsburg; Amy C Sturm; Alicia Y Zhou; Amy A Lemke
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2022-07-07       Impact factor: 11.043

3.  Providing patient education: impact on quantity and quality of family health history collection.

Authors:  Chris A Beadles; R Ryanne Wu; Tiffany Himmel; Adam H Buchanan; Karen P Powell; Elizabeth Hauser; Vincent C Henrich; Geoffrey S Ginsburg; Lori A Orlando
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 2.375

4.  DECIDE: a Decision Support Tool to Facilitate Parents' Choices Regarding Genome-Wide Sequencing.

Authors:  Patricia Birch; S Adam; N Bansback; R R Coe; J Hicklin; A Lehman; K C Li; J M Friedman
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-05-23       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  Effects of a pre-visit educational website on information recall and needs fulfilment in breast cancer genetic counselling, a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Akke Albada; Sandra van Dulmen; Jozien M Bensing; Margreet G E M Ausems
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2012-03-06       Impact factor: 6.466

6.  An Integrated Process and Outcome Evaluation of a Web-Based Communication Tool for Patients With Malignant Lymphoma: Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Inge Renske van Bruinessen; Evelyn M van Weel-Baumgarten; Hans Gouw; Josée M Zijlstra; Sandra van Dulmen
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2016-07-29       Impact factor: 5.428

7.  Evaluation and Implementation of ListeningTime: A Web-Based Preparatory Communication Tool for Elderly Patients With Cancer and Their Health Care Providers.

Authors:  Sandra van Dulmen; Janneke Noordman; Jeanine A Driesenaar; Inge R van Bruinessen; Johanneke Ea Portielje
Journal:  JMIR Cancer       Date:  2019-01-30

8.  Focusing on patient needs and preferences may improve genetic counseling for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Simone Salemink; Nicky Dekker; Carolien M Kets; Erica van der Looij; Wendy A G van Zelst-Stams; Nicoline Hoogerbrugge
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2012-08-23       Impact factor: 2.537

9.  High Satisfaction and Low Distress in Breast Cancer Patients One Year after BRCA-Mutation Testing without Prior Face-to-Face Genetic Counseling.

Authors:  Aisha S Sie; Liesbeth Spruijt; Wendy A G van Zelst-Stams; Arjen R Mensenkamp; Marjolijn J L Ligtenberg; Han G Brunner; Judith B Prins; Nicoline Hoogerbrugge
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2015-11-04       Impact factor: 2.537

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.