Literature DB >> 19517270

Cancer genetic predisposition: information needs of patients irrespective of risk level.

Alison Metcalfe1, Julie Werrett, Lucy Burgess, Cyril Chapman, Collette Clifford.   

Abstract

Increased insight into the information needs of people about cancer genetic predisposition could allow materials to be developed to improve decision-making for those at high risk, whilst those at lower risk could have their anxiety reduced without the need for referral to genetics services. This study aimed to identify information needs of patients concerned about a genetic predisposition to cancer, and explore how this varied according to risk perception, cancer worry, personal motivation and demographics. Stage 1 used semi-structured telephone interviews pre and post participants' genetic risk assessment. The findings informed stage two, a structured questionnaire survey of 1,112 patients, pre and post their genetic risk assessment. Participants were stratified by risk level and included those concerned about an inherited predisposition to breast, ovarian or colorectal cancer. About 512 (46%) responded with equal proportions of responders and non-responders across the risk categories. Findings indicated that irrespective of a person's actual or perceived level of risk, cancer worry, demographic background or personal motivation; priorities in the type of information required were similar. Greatest emphasis focused on information provision about how risk was assessed. Least important was acquiring an understanding about genes and inheritance patterns. Most participants reported difficulties accessing or finding information. Peoples' information needs are consistent irrespective of their risk level and therefore generalised information packages could be developed for anyone requesting cancer genetic risk assessment. Better information is likely to assist patients' understanding and ultimately increase concordance with recommended screening and preventative measures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19517270     DOI: 10.1007/s10689-009-9256-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fam Cancer        ISSN: 1389-9600            Impact factor:   2.375


  21 in total

1.  The primary and secondary care interface: the educational needs of nursing staff for the provision of seamless care.

Authors:  J A Werrett; R H Helm; R Carnwell
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.187

2.  Can the Theory of Planned Behaviour mediate the effects of age, gender and multidimensional health locus of control?

Authors:  Christopher J. Armitage; Paul Norman; Mark Conner
Journal:  Br J Health Psychol       Date:  2002-09

3.  Coping style, psychological distress, risk perception, and satisfaction in subjects attending genetic counselling for hereditary cancer.

Authors:  K Nordin; A Lidén; M Hansson; R Rosenquist; G Berglund
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 6.318

4.  Self-regulation and the behavioural response to DNA risk information: a theoretical analysis and framework for future research.

Authors:  Theresa M Marteau; John Weinman
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2005-09-12       Impact factor: 4.634

5.  Why positive information is processed faster: the density hypothesis.

Authors:  Christian Unkelbach; Klaus Fiedler; Myriam Bayer; Martin Stegmüller; Daniel Danner
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2008-07

6.  Psychosocial impact of the lack of information given at referral about familial risk for cancer.

Authors:  Alison Metcalfe; Julie Werrett; Lucy Burgess; Collette Clifford
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 3.894

7.  Cancer Risk Assessment and Genetic Counseling in an Academic Medical Center: Consultands' Satisfaction, Knowledge, and Behavior in the First Year.

Authors:  M Penles Stadler; J J Mulvihill
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 2.537

8.  Referrals of patients to colorectal cancer genetics services in south-east Scotland.

Authors:  Susan Holloway; Mary Porteous; Roseanne Cetnarskyj; Robert Rush; Sally Appleton; Dermot Gorman; Harry Campbell
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.375

9.  Genetic analysis of breast cancer in the cancer and steroid hormone study.

Authors:  E B Claus; N Risch; W D Thompson
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 11.025

10.  Communication in cancer genetic counselling: does it reflect counselees' previsit needs and preferences?

Authors:  A H Pieterse; A M van Dulmen; M G E M Ausems; F A Beemer; J M Bensing
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2005-05-09       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  10 in total

1.  Closing the loop: action research in a multimodal hereditary cancer patient conference is an effective tool to assess and address patient needs.

Authors:  Carin R Espenschied; Deborah J MacDonald; Julie O Culver; Sharon Sand; Karen Hurley; Kimberly C Banks; Jeffrey N Weitzel; Kathleen R Blazer
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 2.037

2.  A pre-visit tailored website enhances counselees' realistic expectations and knowledge and fulfils information needs for breast cancer genetic counselling.

Authors:  Akke Albada; Sandra van Dulmen; Dick Lindhout; Jozien M Bensing; Margreet G E M Ausems
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 2.375

3.  Breast cancer genetic counselling referrals: how comparable are the findings between the UK and the Netherlands?

Authors:  Akke Albada; Julie Werrett; Sandra Van Dulmen; Jozien M Bensing; Cyril Chapman; Margreet G E M Ausems; Alison Metcalfe
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2011-08-18

4.  "I have always believed I was at high risk..." The role of expectation in emotional responses to the receipt of an average, moderate or high cancer genetic risk assessment result: a thematic analysis of free-text questionnaire comments.

Authors:  J Hilgart; C Phelps; P Bennett; K Hood; K Brain; A Murray
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.375

Review 5.  Genetics, genomics, and cancer risk assessment: State of the Art and Future Directions in the Era of Personalized Medicine.

Authors:  Jeffrey N Weitzel; Kathleen R Blazer; Deborah J MacDonald; Julie O Culver; Kenneth Offit
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2011-08-19       Impact factor: 508.702

6.  Living my family's story: identifying the lived experience in healthy women at risk for hereditary breast cancer.

Authors:  Meghan L Underhill; Robin M Lally; Marc T Kiviniemi; Christine Murekeyisoni; Suzanne S Dickerson
Journal:  Cancer Nurs       Date:  2012 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.592

7.  Colorectal cancer survivors' interest in genetic testing for hereditary cancer: implications for universal tumor screening.

Authors:  Deborah Cragun; Teri L Malo; Tuya Pal; David Shibata; Susan T Vadaparampil
Journal:  Genet Test Mol Biomarkers       Date:  2012-01-06

8.  Effects of a pre-visit educational website on information recall and needs fulfilment in breast cancer genetic counselling, a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Akke Albada; Sandra van Dulmen; Jozien M Bensing; Margreet G E M Ausems
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2012-03-06       Impact factor: 6.466

9.  An online resource of digital stories about cancer genetics: qualitative study of patient preferences and information needs.

Authors:  Rachel Iredale; Lisa Mundy; Jennifer Hilgart
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2011-09-30       Impact factor: 5.428

10.  Validation of an online questionnaire for identifying people at risk of familial and hereditary colorectal cancer.

Authors:  F G J Kallenberg; J E G IJspeert; P M M Bossuyt; C M Aalfs; E Dekker
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 2.375

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.