Literature DB >> 15604633

Decision making with uncertain information: learning from women in a high risk breast cancer clinic.

Caren J Frost1, Vickie Venne, Dianne Cunningham, Ruth Gerritsen-McKane.   

Abstract

Patients and practitioners may believe that clinically validated laboratory tests provide definitive information. Genetic counselors know this is not always so, and the possibility of inconclusive genetic test results is often discussed in the pretest counseling session. This added discussion topic prolongs the process of genetic counseling, but if there is inadequate patient understanding, patient frustration may be high when receiving a result of uncertain significance, and patients may make decisions about subsequent medical management based on incorrect assumptions. For patients/participants in a research setting, where the clinical validity of testing may be unclear, some patients/participants may still want to use test results to influence their medical management. This paper presents findings from a qualitative study wherein 15 women from the High Risk Breast Cancer Clinic at Utah's Huntsman Cancer Institute discussed how uncertainty regarding results affected their decision making. The women were randomly selected from 3 categories--women with test results of uncertain significance; women without cancer who have a mutation; and women who are members of high-risk families, but for whom no mutation was found. Study findings will be used in future studies to better understand how to improve communication regarding uncertain results, especially in a research environment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15604633     DOI: 10.1023/B:JOGC.0000027958.02383.a9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Genet Couns        ISSN: 1059-7700            Impact factor:   2.537


  23 in total

Review 1.  Participation in the cooperative family registry for breast cancer studies: issues of informed consent.

Authors:  M B Daly; K Offit; F Li; G Glendon; A Yaker; D West; B Koenig; M McCredie; V Venne; S Nayfield; D Seminara
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2000-03-15       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  Screening for Down's syndrome--too many choices?

Authors:  Michael T Mennuti; Deborah A Driscoll
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-10-09       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Genetic counselling after carrier detection by newborn screening when one parent carries DeltaF508 and the other R117H.

Authors:  L Curnow; R Savarirayan; J Massie
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 3.791

4.  Tolerance for ambiguity among medical students: implications for their selection, training and practice.

Authors:  G Geller; R R Faden; D M Levine
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 4.634

5.  Across the Spectrum: Case Studies in Genetic Counseling for Breast and Ovarian Cancer.

Authors:  T A DeMarco; B N Peshkin; B M Brogan
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  Anxiety/uncertainty reduction as a motivation for interest in prophylactic oophorectomy in women with a family history of ovarian cancer.

Authors:  K E Hurley; S M Miller; J W Costalas; D Gillespie; M B Daly
Journal:  J Womens Health Gend Based Med       Date:  2001-03

7.  Categorizing genetic tests to identify their ethical, legal, and social implications.

Authors:  W Burke; L E Pinsky; N A Press
Journal:  Am J Med Genet       Date:  2001

8.  Tolerance of uncertainty of medical students and practicing physicians.

Authors:  R Schor; D Pilpel; J Benbassat
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 2.983

9.  Genetic counseling and reproductive uncertainty.

Authors:  D C Wertz; J R Sorenson; T C Heeren
Journal:  Am J Med Genet       Date:  1984-05

10.  The Breast Cancer Family Registry: an infrastructure for cooperative multinational, interdisciplinary and translational studies of the genetic epidemiology of breast cancer.

Authors:  Esther M John; John L Hopper; Jeanne C Beck; Julia A Knight; Susan L Neuhausen; Ruby T Senie; Argyrios Ziogas; Irene L Andrulis; Hoda Anton-Culver; Norman Boyd; Saundra S Buys; Mary B Daly; Frances P O'Malley; Regina M Santella; Melissa C Southey; Vickie L Venne; Deon J Venter; Dee W West; Alice S Whittemore; Daniela Seminara
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2004-05-19       Impact factor: 6.466

View more
  15 in total

Review 1.  Specific psychosocial issues of individuals undergoing genetic counseling for cancer - a literature review.

Authors:  Willem Eijzenga; Daniela E E Hahn; Neil K Aaronson; Irma Kluijt; Eveline M A Bleiker
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-08-31       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 2.  How risk is perceived, constructed and interpreted by clients in clinical genetics, and the effects on decision making: systematic review.

Authors:  Stephanie Sivell; Glyn Elwyn; Clara L Gaff; Angus J Clarke; Rachel Iredale; Chris Shaw; Joanna Dundon; Hazel Thornton; Adrian Edwards
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2007-10-30       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  Sources of uncertainty about daughters' breast cancer risk that emerge during genetic counseling consultations.

Authors:  Carma L Bylund; Carla L Fisher; Dale Brashers; Shawna Edgerson; Emily A Glogowski; Sherry R Boyar; Yelena Kemel; Sara Spencer; David Kissane
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2011-08-11       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  A pre-visit tailored website enhances counselees' realistic expectations and knowledge and fulfils information needs for breast cancer genetic counselling.

Authors:  Akke Albada; Sandra van Dulmen; Dick Lindhout; Jozien M Bensing; Margreet G E M Ausems
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 2.375

5.  Is no news good news? Inconclusive genetic test results in BRCA1 and BRCA2 from patients and professionals' perspectives.

Authors:  Audrey Ardern-Jones; Regina Kenen; Elly Lynch; Rebecca Doherty; Rosalind Eeles
Journal:  Hered Cancer Clin Pract       Date:  2010-01-12       Impact factor: 2.857

6.  "I Don't Want to Be an Ostrich": Managing Mothers' Uncertainty during BRCA1/2 Genetic Counseling.

Authors:  Carla L Fisher; Thomas Roccotagliata; Camella J Rising; David W Kissane; Emily A Glogowski; Carma L Bylund
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-07-30       Impact factor: 2.537

7.  Facilitators and Challenges in Psychosocial Adaptation to Being at Increased Familial Risk of Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Louise Heiniger; Melanie A Price; Margaret Charles; Phyllis N Butow
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2015-03-05       Impact factor: 2.537

8.  On using a cancer center cancer registry to identify newly affected women eligible for hereditary breast cancer syndrome testing: practical considerations.

Authors:  Tiffani A DeMarco; Christopher A Loffredo; Marilyn L Sampilo; Kenneth P Tercyak
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 2.537

9.  Distress and psychosocial needs of a heterogeneous high risk familial cancer population.

Authors:  Tara E Power; John W Robinson; Peter Bridge; Francois P Bernier; Dawna M Gilchrist
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2011-04-21       Impact factor: 2.537

10.  Predictors of decision making in families at risk for inherited breast/ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Suzanne Mellon; James Janisse; Robin Gold; Michelle Cichon; Lisa Berry-Bobovski; Michael A Tainsky; Michael S Simon
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 4.267

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.