Literature DB >> 23963834

Awareness of genetic counseling and perceptions of its purpose: a survey of the Canadian public.

Melissa Maio1, Prescilla Carrion, Elyse Yaremco, Jehannine C Austin.   

Abstract

Genetic counseling can result in better outcomes when clients understand what to expect, and at least theoretically, at some point in their lifespan, anyone could be referred for or benefit from genetic counseling. Thus, in order to identify (and ultimately address) issues around awareness of genetic counseling and perceptions of its purpose, we surveyed the Canadian general population. We acquired 1,000 telephone numbers corresponding to a demographically representative sample of Canada from Survey Sampling International, and invited individuals to participate in a telephone-based survey. We administered a purpose-designed survey (in either French or English) comprising questions regarding: demographics, whether or not the individual had heard of genetic counseling, and 15 Likert scale-rated (strongly disagree-strongly agree) items about the possible purposes of genetic counseling. Responses to these 15 items were used to generate a total "knowledge score". Of the 1,000 numbers, n = 372 could not be reached, and the survey was successfully administered to n = 188 individuals (response rate 30 %). Most respondents (n = 129, 69 %) had not heard of genetic counseling, and substantial proportions thought that genetic counseling aims to prevent genetic diseases and abnormalities, help couples have children with desirable characteristics, and help people to understand their ancestry. These data could be used to inform the strategy for development of future awareness efforts, and as a baseline from which to measure their effects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23963834      PMCID: PMC3825692          DOI: 10.1007/s10897-013-9633-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Genet Couns        ISSN: 1059-7700            Impact factor:   2.537


  26 in total

1.  A new definition of Genetic Counseling: National Society of Genetic Counselors' Task Force report.

Authors:  Robert Resta; Barbara Bowles Biesecker; Robin L Bennett; Sandra Blum; Susan Estabrooks Hahn; Michelle N Strecker; Janet L Williams
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  A pre-visit tailored website enhances counselees' realistic expectations and knowledge and fulfils information needs for breast cancer genetic counselling.

Authors:  Akke Albada; Sandra van Dulmen; Dick Lindhout; Jozien M Bensing; Margreet G E M Ausems
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 2.375

3.  Psychosocial impact of the lack of information given at referral about familial risk for cancer.

Authors:  Alison Metcalfe; Julie Werrett; Lucy Burgess; Collette Clifford
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 3.894

4.  A pilot study of knowledge and interest of genetic counseling and testing for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome among Puerto Rican women.

Authors:  Susan T Vadaparampil; Gwendolyn P Quinn; Julie Dutil; Marieva Puig; Teri L Malo; Jessica McIntyre; Rossybelle Perales; Euna M August; Zuheily Closser
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2011-07-12

5.  Regional differences in awareness and attitudes regarding genetic testing for disease risk and ancestry.

Authors:  Charles R Jonassaint; Eunice R Santos; Crystal M Glover; Perry W Payne; Grace-Ann Fasaye; Nefertiti Oji-Njideka; Stanley Hooker; Wenndy Hernandez; Morris W Foster; Rick A Kittles; Charmaine D Royal
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2010-06-13       Impact factor: 4.132

6.  A sociolinguistic exploration of genetic counseling discourse involving a child with a new genetic diagnosis.

Authors:  Riyana Babul-Hirji; Stacy Hewson; Marina Frescura
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2009-08-21

7.  Global estimates of the prevalence of diabetes for 2010 and 2030.

Authors:  J E Shaw; R A Sicree; P Z Zimmet
Journal:  Diabetes Res Clin Pract       Date:  2009-11-06       Impact factor: 5.602

8.  Effects of a pre-visit educational website on information recall and needs fulfilment in breast cancer genetic counselling, a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Akke Albada; Sandra van Dulmen; Jozien M Bensing; Margreet G E M Ausems
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2012-03-06       Impact factor: 6.466

9.  Communication in cancer genetic counselling: does it reflect counselees' previsit needs and preferences?

Authors:  A H Pieterse; A M van Dulmen; M G E M Ausems; F A Beemer; J M Bensing
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2005-05-09       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Pre-counseling education for low literacy women at risk of Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer (HBOC): patient experiences using the Cancer Risk Education Intervention Tool (CREdIT).

Authors:  Galen Joseph; Mary S Beattie; Robin Lee; Dejana Braithwaite; Carolina Wilcox; Maya Metrikin; Kate Lamvik; Judith Luce
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2010-05-19       Impact factor: 2.537

View more
  12 in total

1.  Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practice Regarding Genetic Testing and Genetic Counselors in Jordan: A Population-Based Survey.

Authors:  Mamoun Ahram; Majd Soubani; Lana Abu Salem; Haneen Saker; Muayyad Ahmad
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  "If It Helps, It's Worth a Try": an Investigation of Perceptions and Attitudes about Genetic Counseling among Southern Manitoba Hutterites.

Authors:  Amber P Gemmell; Patricia McCarthy Veach; Ian MacFarlane; Rachel Riesgraf; Bonnie S LeRoy
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2017-06-14       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 3.  It's Time for the Genetic Counseling Profession to Embrace Social Media.

Authors:  Lauren Gallagher; Jeanna McCuaig; Lacey Benoit; Christine Davies
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-03-30       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Perceptions and Attitudes About Genetic Counseling Among Residents of a Midwestern Rural Area.

Authors:  Rachel J Riesgraf; Patricia McCarthy Veach; Ian M MacFarlane; Bonnie S LeRoy
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2014-10-08       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  Genetic Counseling for Alcohol Addiction: Assessing Perceptions and Potential Utility in Individuals with Lived Experience and Their Family Members.

Authors:  Fayth M Kalb; Victoria Vincent; Teresa Herzog; Jehannine Austin
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2017-02-07       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  Evaluating a unique, specialist psychiatric genetic counseling clinic: uptake and impact.

Authors:  A Inglis; D Koehn; B McGillivray; S E Stewart; J Austin
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2014-05-22       Impact factor: 4.438

7.  Health beliefs associated with readiness for genetic counseling among high risk breast cancer survivors.

Authors:  Maija Reblin; Monica L Kasting; Kelli Nam; Courtney L Scherr; Jongphil Kim; Ram Thapa; Cathy D Meade; M Catherine Lee; Tuya Pal; Gwendolyn P Quinn; Susan T Vadaparampil
Journal:  Breast J       Date:  2018-11-28       Impact factor: 2.431

8.  Development and Pilot Testing of a Decision Aid for Genomic Research Participants Notified of Clinically Actionable Research Findings for Cancer Risk.

Authors:  Amanda M Willis; Sian K Smith; Bettina Meiser; Mandy L Ballinger; David M Thomas; Martin Tattersall; Mary-Anne Young
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2018-02-17       Impact factor: 2.537

9.  Attitudes Toward Autism Spectrum Disorders Among Students of Allied Health Professions.

Authors:  Frida Simonstein; Michal Mashiach-Eizenberg
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-06-02       Impact factor: 2.537

10.  Perceptions of provider's epistemic authority in response to variant of uncertain significance-related recommendations.

Authors:  Sukh Makhnoon; Maureen Mork; Banu Arun; Robert J Volk; Susan K Peterson
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2020-10-08       Impact factor: 2.537

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.