Literature DB >> 21867800

Multimodal, longitudinal assessment of intracortical microstimulation.

Andrew Koivuniemi1, Seth J Wilks, Andrew J Woolley, Kevin J Otto.   

Abstract

The fundamental obstacle to neuroprostheses based on penetrating microstimulation is the tissue's response to the device insertion and to the application of the electrical stimulation. Our long-term goal is to develop multichannel microstimulation of central nervous tissue for clinical therapy. The overall objective of this research is to identify the optimal parameters for a chronically implanted microstimulation device. In particular, the work presented here focuses on the effects of repeated stimulation and the reactive tissue response on the efficacy of stimulation-driven behavior. To this end, psychophysical experiments were performed using multichannel cortical implants in the auditory cortex of rats. Further, we investigated the effect of the device-tissue interfacial quality on the psychophysical threshold. Here, we report the effects of cortical depth, days postimplant on the psychophysical threshold of auditory cortical microstimulation, along with correlated impedance spectral changes and post vivo histology. We expect that these data will further enable neuroprosthetic development.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21867800      PMCID: PMC8098704          DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-444-53815-4.00011-X

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prog Brain Res        ISSN: 0079-6123            Impact factor:   2.453


  50 in total

1.  Chronic neural stimulation with thin-film, iridium oxide electrodes.

Authors:  J D Weiland; D J Anderson
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 4.538

2.  Chronic intracortical microstimulation (ICMS) of cat sensory cortex using the Utah Intracortical Electrode Array.

Authors:  P J Rousche; R A Normann
Journal:  IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng       Date:  1999-03

3.  Extracellular stimulation of central neurons: influence of stimulus waveform and frequency on neuronal output.

Authors:  Cameron C McIntyre; Warren M Grill
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  A model of safe levels for electrical stimulation.

Authors:  R V Shannon
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 4.538

5.  Voltage pulses change neural interface properties and improve unit recordings with chronically implanted microelectrodes.

Authors:  Kevin J Otto; Matthew D Johnson; Daryl R Kipke
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 4.538

6.  The sensations produced by electrical stimulation of the visual cortex.

Authors:  G S Brindley; W S Lewin
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1968-05       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  Cortical microstimulation in auditory cortex of rat elicits best-frequency dependent behaviors.

Authors:  Kevin J Otto; Patrick J Rousche; Daryl R Kipke
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2005-05-31       Impact factor: 5.379

8.  Audiogram of the hooded Norway rat.

Authors:  H E Heffner; R S Heffner; C Contos; T Ott
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Phosphenes produced by electrical stimulation of human occipital cortex, and their application to the development of a prosthesis for the blind.

Authors:  W H Dobelle; M G Mladejovsky
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1974-12       Impact factor: 5.182

View more
  16 in total

1.  The effect of chronic intracortical microstimulation on the electrode-tissue interface.

Authors:  Kevin H Chen; John F Dammann; Jessica L Boback; Francesco V Tenore; Kevin J Otto; Robert A Gaunt; Sliman J Bensmaia
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2014-02-06       Impact factor: 5.379

2.  Enhanced Control of Cortical Pyramidal Neurons With Micromagnetic Stimulation.

Authors:  Seung Woo Lee; Shelley I Fried
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2016-11-22       Impact factor: 3.802

3.  Finding the Location of Axonal Activation by a Miniature Magnetic Coil.

Authors:  Hui Ye
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2022-06-29       Impact factor: 3.387

4.  The Long-Term Stability of Intracortical Microstimulation and the Foreign Body Response Are Layer Dependent.

Authors:  Morgan E Urdaneta; Nicolas G Kunigk; Seth Currlin; Francisco Delgado; Shelley I Fried; Kevin J Otto
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-06-13       Impact factor: 5.152

5.  Chronic intracortical microelectrode arrays induce non-uniform, depth-related tissue responses.

Authors:  Andrew J Woolley; Himanshi A Desai; Kevin J Otto
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2013-02-21       Impact factor: 5.379

6.  In vivo imaging of calcium and glutamate responses to intracortical microstimulation reveals distinct temporal responses of the neuropil and somatic compartments in layer II/III neurons.

Authors:  James R Eles; Takashi D Y Kozai
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2020-01-07       Impact factor: 12.479

7.  Long-term recording reliability of liquid crystal polymer µECoG arrays.

Authors:  Virginia Woods; Michael Trumpis; Brinnae Bent; Kay Palopoli-Trojani; Chia-Han Chiang; Charles Wang; Chunxiu Yu; Michele N Insanally; Robert C Froemke; Jonathan Viventi
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2018-09-24       Impact factor: 5.379

8.  Micro-Coil Design Influences the Spatial Extent of Responses to Intracortical Magnetic Stimulation.

Authors:  Krishnan Thyagarajan; Shelley I Fried
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2018-10-23       Impact factor: 4.538

Review 9.  The Future of Neuroscience: Flexible and Wireless Implantable Neural Electronics.

Authors:  Eve McGlynn; Vahid Nabaei; Elisa Ren; Gabriel Galeote-Checa; Rupam Das; Giulia Curia; Hadi Heidari
Journal:  Adv Sci (Weinh)       Date:  2021-03-09       Impact factor: 16.806

10.  Intact histological characterization of brain-implanted microdevices and surrounding tissue.

Authors:  Andrew J Woolley; Himanshi A Desai; Janak Gaire; Andrew L Ready; Kevin J Otto
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2013-02-11       Impact factor: 1.355

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.