Literature DB >> 15928411

Cortical microstimulation in auditory cortex of rat elicits best-frequency dependent behaviors.

Kevin J Otto1, Patrick J Rousche, Daryl R Kipke.   

Abstract

Electrical activation of the auditory cortex has been shown to elicit an auditory sensation; however, the perceptual effects of auditory cortical microstimulation delivered through penetrating microelectrodes have not been clearly elucidated. This study examines the relationship between electrical microstimulus location within the adult rat auditory cortex and the subsequent behavior induced. Four rats were trained on an auditory frequency discrimination task and their lever-pressing behavior in response to stimuli of intermediate auditory frequencies was quantified. Each trained rat was then implanted with a microwire array in the auditory cortex of the left hemisphere. Best frequencies (BFs) of each electrode in the array were determined by both local field potential and multi-unit spike-rate activity evoked by pure tone stimuli. A cross-dimensional psychophysical generalization paradigm was used to evaluate cortical microstimulation-induced behavior. Using the BFs of each electrode, the microstimulation-induced behavior was evaluated relative to the auditory-induced behavior. Microstimulation resulted in behavior that was dependent on the BFs of the electrodes used for stimulation. These results are consistent with recent reports indicating that electrophysiological recordings of neural responses to sensory stimuli may provide insight into the sensation generated by electrical stimulation of the same sensory neural tissue.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15928411     DOI: 10.1088/1741-2560/2/2/005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neural Eng        ISSN: 1741-2552            Impact factor:   5.379


  22 in total

1.  Representational gain in cortical area underlies increase of memory strength.

Authors:  Kasia M Bieszczad; Norman M Weinberger
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-02-04       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Auditory cortex electrical stimulation suppresses tinnitus in rats.

Authors:  Jinsheng Zhang; Yupeng Zhang; Xueguo Zhang
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2010-11-06

3.  A computational model that predicts behavioral sensitivity to intracortical microstimulation.

Authors:  Sungshin Kim; Thierri Callier; Sliman J Bensmaia
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2016-12-15       Impact factor: 5.379

4.  Multimodal, longitudinal assessment of intracortical microstimulation.

Authors:  Andrew Koivuniemi; Seth J Wilks; Andrew J Woolley; Kevin J Otto
Journal:  Prog Brain Res       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 2.453

5.  Development of closed-loop neural interface technology in a rat model: combining motor cortex operant conditioning with visual cortex microstimulation.

Authors:  Timothy Charles Marzullo; Mark J Lehmkuhle; Gregory J Gage; Daryl R Kipke
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2010-02-08       Impact factor: 3.802

6.  Robust penetrating microelectrodes for neural interfaces realized by titanium micromachining.

Authors:  Patrick T McCarthy; Kevin J Otto; Masaru P Rao
Journal:  Biomed Microdevices       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 2.838

7.  Brain-machine interfaces and transcranial stimulation: future implications for directing functional movement and improving function after spinal injury in humans.

Authors:  Jose M Carmena; Leonardo G Cohen
Journal:  Handb Clin Neurol       Date:  2012

8.  Decoding stimulus identity from multi-unit activity and local field potentials along the ventral auditory stream in the awake primate: implications for cortical neural prostheses.

Authors:  Elliot Smith; Spencer Kellis; Paul House; Bradley Greger
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2013-01-03       Impact factor: 5.379

9.  Prolonged wakefulness alters neuronal responsiveness to local electrical stimulation of the neocortex in awake rats..

Authors:  Vladyslav V Vyazovskiy; Umberto Olcese; Chiara Cirelli; Giulio Tononi
Journal:  J Sleep Res       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 3.981

Review 10.  Techniques and devices to restore cognition.

Authors:  Mijail Demian Serruya; Michael J Kahana
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2008-04-20       Impact factor: 3.332

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.