Literature DB >> 30369434

Micro-Coil Design Influences the Spatial Extent of Responses to Intracortical Magnetic Stimulation.

Krishnan Thyagarajan, Shelley I Fried.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Electrical stimulation via cortically implanted electrodes has been proposed to treat a wide range of neurological disorders. Effectiveness has been limited, however, in part due to the inability of conventional electrodes to activate specific types of neurons while avoiding other types. Recent demonstrations that magnetic stimulation from a micro-coil can selectively activate pyramidal neurons (PNs) while avoiding passing axons suggest the possibility that such an approach can overcome some this limitation and here we use computer simulations to explore how the micro-coil design influences the selectivity with which neurons are activated.
METHODS: A computational model was developed to compare the selectivity of magnetic stimulation induced by rectangular-, V-, and W-shaped coil designs. The more promising designs (V- and W-shapes) were fabricated for use in electrophysiological experiments including in vitro patch-clamp recording and calcium imaging (GCaMP6f) of mouse brain slices.
RESULTS: Both V- and W-shaped coils reliably activated layer 5 (L5) PNs but V-coils were more effective while W-coils were more selective. Activation thresholds with double-loop coils were approximately one-half those of single-loop coils. Calcium imaging revealed that both V- and W-coils better confine activation than electrodes.
CONCLUSION: Individual design features can influence both the strength as well as the selectivity of micro-coils and can be accurately predicted by computer simulations. SIGNIFICANCE: Our results show that how coil design influences the response of cortical neurons to stimulation and are an important step toward the development of next-generation cortical prostheses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30369434      PMCID: PMC6561646          DOI: 10.1109/TBME.2018.2877713

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng        ISSN: 0018-9294            Impact factor:   4.538


  71 in total

1.  Over-pulsing degrades activated iridium oxide films used for intracortical neural stimulation.

Authors:  Stuart F Cogan; Andrew A Guzelian; William F Agnew; Ted G H Yuen; Douglas B McCreery
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2004-08-30       Impact factor: 2.390

Review 2.  Selection of stimulus parameters for deep brain stimulation.

Authors:  Alexis M Kuncel; Warren M Grill
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 3.708

Review 3.  Electrical stimulation of excitable tissue: design of efficacious and safe protocols.

Authors:  Daniel R Merrill; Marom Bikson; John G R Jefferys
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2005-02-15       Impact factor: 2.390

4.  Organization of rat vibrissa motor cortex and adjacent areas according to cytoarchitectonics, microstimulation, and intracellular stimulation of identified cells.

Authors:  Michael Brecht; Andreas Krauss; Sajjad Muhammad; Laleh Sinai-Esfahani; Sebastiano Bellanca; Troy W Margrie
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2004-11-22       Impact factor: 3.215

5.  Laminar variation in threshold for detection of electrical excitation of striate cortex by macaques.

Authors:  Edgar A DeYoe; Jeffrey D Lewine; Robert W Doty
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2005-08-03       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Current steering to control the volume of tissue activated during deep brain stimulation.

Authors:  Christopher R Butson; Cameron C McIntyre
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 8.955

7.  Pulse width dependence of motor threshold and input-output curve characterized with controllable pulse parameter transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Angel V Peterchev; Stefan M Goetz; Gregory G Westin; Bruce Luber; Sarah H Lisanby
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 3.708

8.  Multimodal, longitudinal assessment of intracortical microstimulation.

Authors:  Andrew Koivuniemi; Seth J Wilks; Andrew J Woolley; Kevin J Otto
Journal:  Prog Brain Res       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 2.453

9.  Effects of induced electric fields on finite neuronal structures: a simulation study.

Authors:  S S Nagarajan; D M Durand; E N Warman
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 4.538

10.  Single electrode micro-stimulation of rat auditory cortex: an evaluation of behavioral performance.

Authors:  Patrick J Rousche; Kevin J Otto; Mark P Reilly; Daryl R Kipke
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 3.208

View more
  6 in total

1.  Nanotechnology Enables Novel Modalities for Neuromodulation.

Authors:  Xiao Yang; Eve McGlynn; Rupam Das; Sergiu P Paşca; Bianxiao Cui; Hadi Heidari
Journal:  Adv Mater       Date:  2021-10-19       Impact factor: 30.849

2.  Finding the Location of Axonal Activation by a Miniature Magnetic Coil.

Authors:  Hui Ye
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2022-06-29       Impact factor: 3.387

3.  Magnetic stimulation allows focal activation of the mouse cochlea.

Authors:  Jae-Ik Lee; Richard Seist; Stephen McInturff; Daniel J Lee; M Christian Brown; Konstantina M Stankovic; Shelley Fried
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-05-24       Impact factor: 8.713

4.  Selective Activation of Cortical Columns Using Multichannel Magnetic Stimulation With a Bent Flat Microwire Array.

Authors:  Seung Woo Lee
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2021-06-17       Impact factor: 4.756

5.  Micro-coil probes for magnetic intracortical neural stimulation: Trade-offs in materials and design.

Authors:  Krishnan Thyagarajan; Rene A Lujan; Qian Wang; JengPing Lu; Sivkheng Kor; Bruce Kakimoto; Norine Chang; Julie A Bert
Journal:  APL Mater       Date:  2021-01-01       Impact factor: 5.096

6.  Spatially confined responses of mouse visual cortex to intracortical magnetic stimulation from micro-coils.

Authors:  Sang Baek Ryu; Angelique C Paulk; Jimmy C Yang; Mehran Ganji; Shadi A Dayeh; Sydney S Cash; Shelley I Fried; Seung Woo Lee
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2020-10-23       Impact factor: 5.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.