Literature DB >> 21861685

Distinct contributions of the magnocellular and parvocellular visual streams to perceptual selection.

Rachel N Denison1, Michael A Silver.   

Abstract

During binocular rivalry, conflicting images presented to the two eyes compete for perceptual dominance, but the neural basis of this competition is disputed. In interocular switch rivalry, rival images periodically exchanged between the two eyes generate one of two types of perceptual alternation: (1) a fast, regular alternation between the images that is time-locked to the stimulus switches and has been proposed to arise from competition at lower levels of the visual processing hierarchy or (2) a slow, irregular alternation spanning multiple stimulus switches that has been associated with higher levels of the visual system. The existence of these two types of perceptual alternation has been influential in establishing the view that rivalry may be resolved at multiple hierarchical levels of the visual system. We varied the spatial, temporal, and luminance properties of interocular switch rivalry gratings and found, instead, an association between fast, regular perceptual alternations and processing by the magnocellular stream and between slow, irregular alternations and processing by the parvocellular stream. The magnocellular and parvocellular streams are two early visual pathways that are specialized for the processing of motion and form, respectively. These results provide a new framework for understanding the neural substrates of binocular rivalry that emphasizes the importance of parallel visual processing streams, and not only hierarchical organization, in the perceptual resolution of ambiguities in the visual environment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21861685      PMCID: PMC4176614          DOI: 10.1162/jocn_a_00121

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  63 in total

1.  Integration of motion information during binocular rivalry.

Authors:  Timothy J Andrews; Colin Blakemore
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Binocular motion rivalry in macaque monkeys: eye dominance and tracking eye movements.

Authors:  N K Logothetis; J D Schall
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Binocular rivalry and motion perception.

Authors:  R Blake; K Yu; M Lokey; H Norman
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 4.  Binocular rivalry: ambiguities resolved.

Authors:  F Sengpiel
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  1997-07-01       Impact factor: 10.834

5.  The Psychophysics Toolbox.

Authors:  D H Brainard
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

6.  When the brain changes its mind: interocular grouping during binocular rivalry.

Authors:  I Kovács; T V Papathomas; M Yang; A Fehér
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1996-12-24       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  What is rivalling during binocular rivalry?

Authors:  N K Logothetis; D A Leopold; D L Sheinberg
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1996-04-18       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Psychophysical studies of monkey vision. I. Macaque luminosity and color vision tests.

Authors:  R L De Valois; H C Morgan; M C Polson; W R Mead; E M Hull
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1974-01       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 9.  Psychophysical evidence for separate channels for the perception of form, color, movement, and depth.

Authors:  M S Livingstone; D H Hubel
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Psychophysical evidence for a magnocellular pathway deficit in dyslexia.

Authors:  J B Demb; G M Boynton; M Best; D J Heeger
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 1.886

View more
  12 in total

1.  Attention model of binocular rivalry.

Authors:  Hsin-Hung Li; James Rankin; John Rinzel; Marisa Carrasco; David J Heeger
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-07-10       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Colour misbinding during motion rivalry.

Authors:  Ryan T Maloney; Sarah K Lam; Colin W G Clifford
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2013-02-23       Impact factor: 3.703

3.  A monocular contribution to stimulus rivalry.

Authors:  Jan Brascamp; Hansem Sohn; Sang-Hun Lee; Randolph Blake
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-04-22       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Individual differences in the temporal dynamics of binocular rivalry and stimulus rivalry.

Authors:  Vaama Patel; Sjoerd Stuit; Randolph Blake
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-04

5.  Functional mapping of the magnocellular and parvocellular subdivisions of human LGN.

Authors:  Rachel N Denison; An T Vu; Essa Yacoub; David A Feinberg; Michael A Silver
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2014-07-17       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Seeing fruit on trees: enhanced perceptual dissimilarity from multiple ambiguous neural representations.

Authors:  Jaelyn R Peiso; Steven K Shevell
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 2.129

7.  Binocular rivalry produced by temporal frequency differences.

Authors:  David Alais; Amanda Parker
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2012-07-31       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  Chromatic interocular-switch rivalry.

Authors:  Jens H Christiansen; Anthony D D'Antona; Steven K Shevell
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2017-05-01       Impact factor: 2.240

9.  Stimulus rivalry and binocular rivalry share a common neural substrate.

Authors:  Vadim Petruk; Bin He; Stephen Engel; Sheng He
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2018-09-04       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  Methods to assess binocular rivalry with periodic stimuli.

Authors:  Farzaneh Darki; James Rankin
Journal:  J Math Neurosci       Date:  2020-06-15       Impact factor: 1.300

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.