Literature DB >> 11809483

Integration of motion information during binocular rivalry.

Timothy J Andrews1, Colin Blakemore.   

Abstract

When two moving gratings are superimposed in normal viewing they often combine to form a pattern that moves with a single direction of motion. Here, we investigated whether the same mechanism underlies pattern motion when drifting gratings are presented independently to the two eyes. We report that, with relatively large circular grating patches (4 deg), there are periods of monocular dominance in which one eye's orientation alone is perceived, usually moving orthogonal to the contours (component motion). But, during the transitions from one monocular view to the other, a fluid mosaic is perceived, consisting of contiguous patches, each containing contours of only one of the gratings. This entire mosaic often appears to move in a single direction (pattern motion), just as when two gratings are literally superimposed. Although this implies that motion signals from the perceptually suppressed grating continue to influence the perception of motion, an alternative possibility is that it reflects a strategy that involves integrating directional information from the contiguous single-grating patches. To test between these possibilities, we performed a second experiment with very small grating stimuli that were about the same size as the contiguous single-grating patches in the mosaic (1-deg diameter). Despite the fact that the form of only one grating was perceived, we report that pattern motion was still perceived on about one third of trials. Moreover, a decrease in the occurrence of pattern motion was apparent when the contrast and spatial frequency of the gratings were made more different from each other. This phenomenon clearly demonstrates an independent binocular interaction for form and motion.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11809483     DOI: 10.1016/s0042-6989(01)00286-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  17 in total

1.  Binocular integration of pattern motion signals by MT neurons and by human observers.

Authors:  Chris Tailby; Najib J Majaj; J Anthony Movshon
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  The influence of chromatic context on binocular color rivalry: perception and neural representation.

Authors:  Sang Wook Hong; Steven K Shevell
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-03-10       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Distinct contributions of the magnocellular and parvocellular visual streams to perceptual selection.

Authors:  Rachel N Denison; Michael A Silver
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2011-08-23       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Detecting contrast changes in invisible patterns during binocular rivalry.

Authors:  Sam Ling; Bjorn Hubert-Wallander; Randolph Blake
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2010-09-19       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 5.  Binocular vision.

Authors:  Randolph Blake; Hugh Wilson
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2010-10-15       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Color-binding errors during rivalrous suppression of form.

Authors:  Sang Wook Hong; Steven K Shevell
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2009-07-23

Review 7.  Binocular response modulation in the lateral geniculate nucleus.

Authors:  Kacie Dougherty; Michael C Schmid; Alexander Maier
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2018-03-09       Impact factor: 3.215

8.  Willpower and conscious percept: volitional switching in binocular rivalry.

Authors:  Laila Hugrass; David Crewther
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-25       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  How simultaneous is the perception of binocular depth and rivalry in plaid stimuli?

Authors:  Athena Buckthought; Janine D Mendola
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2012-05-09

10.  Binocular rivalry produced by temporal frequency differences.

Authors:  David Alais; Amanda Parker
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2012-07-31       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.