Literature DB >> 9526082

Binocular rivalry and motion perception.

R Blake1, K Yu, M Lokey, H Norman.   

Abstract

In a series of experiments psychophysical techniques were used to study the relation between binocular rivalry and motion perception. An initial series of experiments confirmed that motion enhances the predominance of an eye during rivalry, although the direction of motion does not matter. The presence of an annulus of motion immediately surrounding one eye's rival target greatly enhances dominance of that target, but the influence of the annulus progressively decreases as the separation between disk and annulus increased. Opponent directions of motion in disk and annulus yield greater dominance than when dots in the disk and annulus moved in identical directions. In a second experiment that two eyes were adapted to orthogonal directions of motion, generating strong, distinctively different monocular motion aftereffects (MAEs). Even though the two eyes view physically identical random-motion displays following differential adaptation, binocular rivalry of the discrepant MAEs can occur. Finally, using a stimulus replacement technique to measure detectability of translational and rotational motion, it was found that both types of motion were readily detected during periods of dominance but went undetected during periods of suppression. Taken together, these results bear on the process responsible for rivalry and its neural locus relative to the analysis of different types of motion.

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9526082     DOI: 10.1162/089892998563770

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  17 in total

1.  Deconstructing continuous flash suppression.

Authors:  Eunice Yang; Randolph Blake
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2012-03-08       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  The influence of chromatic context on binocular color rivalry: perception and neural representation.

Authors:  Sang Wook Hong; Steven K Shevell
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-03-10       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Natural images dominate in binocular rivalry.

Authors:  Daniel H Baker; Erich W Graf
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-03-16       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Distinct contributions of the magnocellular and parvocellular visual streams to perceptual selection.

Authors:  Rachel N Denison; Michael A Silver
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2011-08-23       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 5.  Seeing the invisible: the scope and limits of unconscious processing in binocular rivalry.

Authors:  Zhicheng Lin; Sheng He
Journal:  Prog Neurobiol       Date:  2008-09-07       Impact factor: 11.685

6.  Predominance of ground over ceiling surfaces in binocular rivalry.

Authors:  Kerem Ozkan; Myron L Braunstein
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  Color-binding errors during rivalrous suppression of form.

Authors:  Sang Wook Hong; Steven K Shevell
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2009-07-23

8.  Audiovisual integration of speech in a bistable illusion.

Authors:  K G Munhall; M W ten Hove; M Brammer; M Paré
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2009-04-02       Impact factor: 10.834

9.  Binocular rivalry alternations and their relation to visual adaptation.

Authors:  Daphne Roumani; Konstantinos Moutoussis
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Binocular rivalry produced by temporal frequency differences.

Authors:  David Alais; Amanda Parker
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2012-07-31       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.