Literature DB >> 25092387

Individual differences in the temporal dynamics of binocular rivalry and stimulus rivalry.

Vaama Patel1, Sjoerd Stuit, Randolph Blake.   

Abstract

Binocular rivalry and stimulus rivalry are two forms of perceptual instability that arise when the visual system is confronted with conflicting stimulus information. In the case of binocular rivalry, dissimilar monocular stimuli are presented to the two eyes for an extended period of time, whereas for stimulus rivalry the dissimilar monocular stimuli are exchanged rapidly and repetitively between the eyes during extended viewing. With both forms of rivalry, one experiences extended durations of exclusive perceptual dominance that fluctuate between the two stimuli. Whether these two forms of rivalry arise within different stages of visual processing has remained debatable. Using an individual-differences approach, we found that both stimulus rivalry and binocular rivalry exhibited same-shaped distributions of dominance durations among a sample of 30 observers and, moreover, that the dominance durations measured during binocular and stimulus rivalry were significantly correlated among our sample of observers. Furthermore, we found a significant, positive correlation between alternation rate in binocular rivalry and the incidence of stimulus rivalry. These results suggest that the two forms of rivalry may be tapping common neural mechanisms, or at least different mechanisms with comparable time constants. It remains to be learned just why the incidences of binocular rivalry and stimulus rivalry vary so greatly among people.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25092387      PMCID: PMC4318784          DOI: 10.3758/s13423-014-0695-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  35 in total

1.  Multistable phenomena: changing views in perception.

Authors: 
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 20.229

2.  Spike-frequency adaptation of a generalized leaky integrate-and-fire model neuron.

Authors:  Y H Liu; X J Wang
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2001 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.621

3.  Increasing depth of binocular rivalry suppression along two visual pathways.

Authors:  Vincent A Nguyen; Alan W Freeman; David Alais
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Distributions of alternation rates in various forms of bistable perception.

Authors:  Jan W Brascamp; Raymond van Ee; Wiebe R Pestman; Albert V van den Berg
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2005-04-04       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  The Psychophysics Toolbox.

Authors:  D H Brainard
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

6.  When the brain changes its mind: interocular grouping during binocular rivalry.

Authors:  I Kovács; T V Papathomas; M Yang; A Fehér
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1996-12-24       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Can binocular rivalry reveal neural correlates of consciousness?

Authors:  Randolph Blake; Jan Brascamp; David J Heeger
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2014-03-17       Impact factor: 6.237

8.  What is rivalling during binocular rivalry?

Authors:  N K Logothetis; D A Leopold; D L Sheinberg
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1996-04-18       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Introduction to research topic - binocular rivalry: a gateway to studying consciousness.

Authors:  Alexander Maier; Theofanis I Panagiotaropoulos; Naotsugu Tsuchiya; Georgios A Keliris
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2012-09-25       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Temporal patterns of saccadic eye movements predict individual variation in alternation rate during binocular rivalry.

Authors:  Sarah Hancock; Lynn Gareze; John M Findlay; Timothy J Andrews
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2012-01-27
View more
  8 in total

1.  Attention model of binocular rivalry.

Authors:  Hsin-Hung Li; James Rankin; John Rinzel; Marisa Carrasco; David J Heeger
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-07-10       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Frequency of alpha oscillation predicts individual differences in perceptual stability during binocular rivalry.

Authors:  Sucharit Katyal; Sheng He; Bin He; Stephen A Engel
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Filling-in rivalry: Perceptual alternations in the absence of retinal image conflict.

Authors:  Zhimin Chen; Gerrit W Maus; David Whitney; Rachel N Denison
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2017-01-01       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  What happens in the brain of meditators when perception changes but not the stimulus?

Authors:  Jürgen Kornmeier; Evelyn Friedel; Lukas Hecker; Stefan Schmidt; Marc Wittmann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-10-24       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Predictive context biases binocular rivalry in children and adults with no positive relation to two measures of social cognition.

Authors:  Christian Valuch; Louisa Kulke
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-02-06       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Chromatic interocular-switch rivalry.

Authors:  Jens H Christiansen; Anthony D D'Antona; Steven K Shevell
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2017-05-01       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  The Independent and Shared Mechanisms of Intrinsic Brain Dynamics: Insights From Bistable Perception.

Authors:  Teng Cao; Lan Wang; Zhouyuan Sun; Stephen A Engel; Sheng He
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-04-24

8.  Stimulus rivalry and binocular rivalry share a common neural substrate.

Authors:  Vadim Petruk; Bin He; Stephen Engel; Sheng He
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2018-09-04       Impact factor: 2.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.