Literature DB >> 8986842

When the brain changes its mind: interocular grouping during binocular rivalry.

I Kovács1, T V Papathomas, M Yang, A Fehér.   

Abstract

The prevalent view of binocular rivalry holds that it is a competition between the two eyes mediated by reciprocal inhibition among monocular neurons. This view is largely due to the nature of conventional rivalry-inducing stimuli, which are pairs of dissimilar images with coherent patterns within each eye's image. Is it the eye of origin or the coherency of patterns that determines perceptual alternations between coherent percepts in binocular rivalry? We break the coherency of conventional stimuli and replace them by complementary patchworks of intermingled rivalrous images. Can the brain unscramble the pieces of the patchwork arriving from different eyes to obtain coherent percepts? We find that pattern coherency in itself can drive perceptual alternations, and the patchworks are reassembled into coherent forms by most observers. This result is in agreement with recent neurophysiological and psychophysical evidence demonstrating that there is more to binocular rivalry than mere eye competition.

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8986842      PMCID: PMC26435          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.93.26.15508

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  18 in total

Review 1.  A neural theory of binocular rivalry.

Authors:  R Blake
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 8.934

Review 2.  An astable multivibrator model of binocular rivalry.

Authors:  S R Lehky
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 1.490

Review 3.  Concurrent processing streams in monkey visual cortex.

Authors:  E A DeYoe; D C Van Essen
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 13.837

4.  Stereopsis and binocular rivalry.

Authors:  J M Wolfe
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 8.934

5.  Blindsight in normal observers.

Authors:  F C Kolb; J Braun
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1995-09-28       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  What is rivalling during binocular rivalry?

Authors:  N K Logothetis; D A Leopold; D L Sheinberg
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1996-04-18       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Functional morphology of the feedback pathway from area 17 of the cat visual cortex to the lateral geniculate nucleus.

Authors:  P C Murphy; A M Sillito
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1996-02-01       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Activity changes in early visual cortex reflect monkeys' percepts during binocular rivalry.

Authors:  D A Leopold; N K Logothetis
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1996-02-08       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  The dynamic model of binocular rivalry.

Authors:  K Matsuoka
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 2.086

10.  Neural models of brightness perception and retinal rivalry in binocular vision.

Authors:  N Sugie
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 2.086

View more
  105 in total

1.  Increased synchronization of neuromagnetic responses during conscious perception.

Authors:  R Srinivasan; D P Russell; G M Edelman; G Tononi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1999-07-01       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 2.  A spiking neuron model for binocular rivalry.

Authors:  Carlo R Laing; Carson C Chow
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2002 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.621

3.  The relationship between cortical activation and perception investigated with invisible stimuli.

Authors:  K Moutoussis; S Zeki
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-06-27       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  How context influences predominance during binocular rivalry.

Authors:  Kenith V Sobel; Randolph Blake
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 1.490

5.  Can attention selectively bias bistable perception? Differences between binocular rivalry and ambiguous figures.

Authors:  Ming Meng; Frank Tong
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2004-07-01       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Computational evidence for a rivalry hierarchy in vision.

Authors:  Hugh R Wilson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-11-11       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 7.  Multistability in auditory stream segregation: a predictive coding view.

Authors:  István Winkler; Susan Denham; Robert Mill; Tamás M Bohm; Alexandra Bendixen
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 8.  United we sense, divided we fail: context-driven perception of ambiguous visual stimuli.

Authors:  P C Klink; R J A van Wezel; R van Ee
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 6.237

9.  Individual differences in the temporal dynamics of binocular rivalry and stimulus rivalry.

Authors:  Vaama Patel; Sjoerd Stuit; Randolph Blake
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-04

10.  Nonlinear SSVEP responses are sensitive to the perceptual binding of visual hemifields during conventional 'eye' rivalry and interocular 'percept' rivalry.

Authors:  David Sutoyo; Ramesh Srinivasan
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2008-10-14       Impact factor: 3.252

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.