Literature DB >> 21857516

Comparison of ear-canal reflectance and umbo velocity in patients with conductive hearing loss: a preliminary study.

Hideko H Nakajima1, Dominic V Pisano, Christof Roosli, Mohamad A Hamade, Gabrielle R Merchant, Lorice Mahfoud, Christopher F Halpin, John J Rosowski, Saumil N Merchant.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The goal of the present study was to investigate the clinical utility of measurements of ear-canal reflectance (ECR) in a population of patients with conductive hearing loss in the presence of an intact, healthy tympanic membrane and an aerated middle ear. We also sought to compare the diagnostic accuracy of umbo velocity (VU) measurements and measurements of ECR in the same group of patients.
DESIGN: This prospective study comprised 31 adult patients with conductive hearing loss, of which 14 had surgically confirmed stapes fixation due to otosclerosis, 6 had surgically confirmed ossicular discontinuity, and 11 had computed tomography and vestibular evoked myogenic potential confirmed superior semicircular canal dehiscence (SCD). Measurements on all 31 ears included pure-tone audiometry for 0.25 to 8 kHz, ECR for 0.2 to 6 kHz using the Mimosa Acoustics HearID system, and VU for 0.3 to 6 kHz using the HLV-1000 laser Doppler vibrometer (Polytec Inc, Waldbronn, Germany). We analyzed power reflectance |ECR| as well as the absorbance level = 10 × log10(1 - |ECR|). All measurements were made before any surgical intervention. The VU and ECR data were plotted against normative data obtained in a companion study of 58 strictly defined normal ears ().
RESULTS: Small increases in |ECR| at low-to-mid frequencies (400-1000 Hz) were observed in cases with stapes fixation, while narrowband decreases were seen for both SCD and ossicular discontinuity. The SCD and ossicular discontinuity differed in that the SCD had smaller decreases at mid-frequency (∼1000 Hz), whereas ossicular discontinuity had larger decreases at lower frequencies (500-800 Hz). SCD tended to have less air-bone gap at high frequencies (1-4 kHz) compared with stapes fixation and ossicular discontinuity. The |ECR| measurements, in conjunction with audiometry, could successfully separate 28 of the 31 cases into the three pathologies. By comparison, VU measurements, in conjunction with audiometry, could successfully separate various pathologies in 29 of 31 cases.
CONCLUSIONS: The combination of |ECR| with audiometry showed clinical utility in the differential diagnosis of conductive hearing loss in the presence of an intact tympanic membrane and an aerated middle ear and seems to be of similar sensitivity and specificity to measurements of VU plus audiometry. Additional research is needed to expand upon these promising preliminary results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 21857516      PMCID: PMC3246129          DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31822ccba0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ear Hear        ISSN: 0196-0202            Impact factor:   3.570


  29 in total

1.  Evaluation of eardrum laser doppler interferometry as a diagnostic tool.

Authors:  A M Huber; C Schwab; T Linder; S J Stoeckli; M Ferrazzini; N Dillier; U Fisch
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 3.325

2.  Estimating the acoustic reflex threshold from wideband measures of reflectance, admittance, and power.

Authors:  M P Feeney; D H Keefe
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  Diagnostic utility of laser-Doppler vibrometry in conductive hearing loss with normal tympanic membrane.

Authors:  John J Rosowski; Ritvik P Mehta; Saumil N Merchant
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 2.311

Review 4.  Auditory brainstem circuits that mediate the middle ear muscle reflex.

Authors:  Sudeep Mukerji; Alanna Marie Windsor; Daniel J Lee
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2010-09-23

5.  An in situ calibration for hearing thresholds.

Authors:  Robert H Withnell; Patricia S Jeng; Kelly Waldvogel; Kari Morgenstein; Jont B Allen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Wideband reflectance in newborns: normative regions and relationship to hearing-screening results.

Authors:  Lisa L Hunter; M Patrick Feeney; Judi A Lapsley Miller; Patricia S Jeng; Susie Bohning
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  Ear-canal reflectance, umbo velocity, and tympanometry in normal-hearing adults.

Authors:  John J Rosowski; Hideko H Nakajima; Mohamad A Hamade; Lorice Mahfoud; Gabrielle R Merchant; Christopher F Halpin; Saumil N Merchant
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2012 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Wideband energy reflectance measurements of ossicular chain discontinuity and repair in human temporal bone.

Authors:  M Patrick Feeney; Iain L Grant; David M Mills
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Superior semicircular canal dehiscence presenting as conductive hearing loss without vertigo.

Authors:  Anthony A Mikulec; Michael J McKenna; Mitchell J Ramsey; John J Rosowski; Barbara S Herrmann; Steven D Rauch; Hugh D Curtin; Saumil N Merchant
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 2.311

10.  Wideband energy reflectance measurements in adults with middle-ear disorders.

Authors:  M Patrick Feeney; Iain L Grant; Lindsay P Marryott
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 2.297

View more
  30 in total

1.  Reflectance measurement validation using acoustic horns.

Authors:  Daniel M Rasetshwane; Stephen T Neely
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Non-invasive estimation of middle-ear input impedance and efficiency.

Authors:  James D Lewis; Stephen T Neely
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Wideband absorbance tympanometry: a novel method in identifying otosclerosis.

Authors:  Arunraj Karuppannan; Animesh Barman
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2021-01-03       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Factors affecting sound energy absorbance in acute otitis media model of chinchilla.

Authors:  Xiying Guan; Thomas W Seale; Rong Z Gan
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2017-04-10       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Conductive hearing loss induced by experimental middle-ear effusion in a chinchilla model reveals impaired tympanic membrane-coupled ossicular chain movement.

Authors:  Jennifer L Thornton; Keely M Chevallier; Kanthaiah Koka; Sandra A Gabbard; Daniel J Tollin; Daniel Tollin
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2013-04-25

6.  The Audiometric and Mechanical Effects of Partial Ossicular Discontinuity.

Authors:  Rosemary B Farahmand; Gabrielle R Merchant; Sarah A Lookabaugh; Christof Röösli; Cagatay H Ulku; Michael J McKenna; Ronald K de Venecia; Christopher F Halpin; John J Rosowski; Hideko H Nakajima
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  Controlled exploration of the effects of conductive hearing loss on wideband acoustic immittance in human cadaveric preparations.

Authors:  Gabrielle R Merchant; Saumil N Merchant; John J Rosowski; Hideko Heidi Nakajima
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2016-08-03       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Investigation of middle ear anatomy and function with combined video otoscopy-phase sensitive OCT.

Authors:  Jesung Park; Jeffrey T Cheng; Daniel Ferguson; Gopi Maguluri; Ernest W Chang; Caitlin Clancy; Daniel J Lee; Nicusor Iftimia
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2016-01-05       Impact factor: 3.732

9.  Investigation of bacterial biofilm in the human middle ear using optical coherence tomography and acoustic measurements.

Authors:  Cac T Nguyen; Sarah R Robinson; Woonggyu Jung; Michael A Novak; Stephen A Boppart; Jont B Allen
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2013-04-12       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Characterizing the ear canal acoustic impedance and reflectance by pole-zero fitting.

Authors:  Sarah R Robinson; Cac T Nguyen; Jont B Allen
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2013-03-22       Impact factor: 3.208

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.