Literature DB >> 21857517

Ear-canal reflectance, umbo velocity, and tympanometry in normal-hearing adults.

John J Rosowski1, Hideko H Nakajima, Mohamad A Hamade, Lorice Mahfoud, Gabrielle R Merchant, Christopher F Halpin, Saumil N Merchant.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study compares measurements of ear-canal reflectance (ECR) to other objective measurements of middle ear function including audiometry, umbo velocity (VU), and tympanometry in a population of strictly defined normal-hearing ears.
DESIGN: Data were prospectively gathered from 58 ears of 29 normal-hearing subjects, 16 females and 13 males, aged 22 to 64 yr. Subjects met all of the following criteria to be considered as having normal hearing: (1) no history of significant middle ear disease; (2) no history of otologic surgery; (3) normal tympanic membrane on otoscopy; (4) pure-tone audiometric thresholds of 20 dB HL or better for 0.25 to 8 kHz; (5) air-bone gaps no greater than 15 dB at 0.25 kHz and 10 dB for 0.5 to 4 kHz; (6) normal, type-A peaked tympanograms; and (7) all subjects had two "normal" ears (as defined by these criteria). Measurements included pure-tone audiometry for 0.25 to 8 kHz, standard 226 Hz tympanometry, ECR for 0.2 to 6 kHz at 60 dB SPL using the Mimosa Acoustics HearID system, and umbo velocity (VU) for 0.3 to 6 kHz at 70 to 90 dB SPL using the HLV-1000 laser Doppler vibrometer (Polytec Inc).
RESULTS: Mean power reflectance (|ECR|) was near 1.0 at 0.2 to 0.3 kHz, decreased to a broad minimum of 0.3 to 0.4 between 1 and 4 kHz, and then sharply increased to almost 0.8 by 6 kHz. The mean pressure reflectance phase angle (∠ECR) plotted on a linear frequency scale showed a group delay of approximately 0.1 msec for 0.2 to 6 kHz. Small significant differences were observed in |ECR| at the lowest frequencies between right and left ears and between males and females at 4 kHz. |ECR| decreased with age but reached significance only at 1 kHz. Our ECR measurements were generally similar to previous published reports. Highly significant negative correlations were found between |ECR| and VU for frequencies below 1 kHz. Significant correlations were also found between the tympanometrically determined peak total compliance and |ECR| and VU at frequencies below 1 kHz. The results suggest that middle ear compliance contributes significantly to the measured power reflectance and umbo velocity at frequencies below 1 kHz but not at higher frequencies.
CONCLUSIONS: This study has established a database of objective measurements of middle ear function (ECR, umbo velocity, tympanometry) in a population of strictly defined normal-hearing ears. These data will promote our understanding of normal middle ear function and will serve as a control for comparison to similar measurements made in pathological ears.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 21857517      PMCID: PMC3223546          DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31822ccb76

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ear Hear        ISSN: 0196-0202            Impact factor:   3.570


  56 in total

1.  Acoustic reflex detection using wide-band acoustic reflectance, admittance, and power measurements.

Authors:  M P Feeney; D H Keefe
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  Experimental and clinical studies of malleus fixation.

Authors:  Hideko Heidi Nakajima; Michael E Ravicz; John J Rosowski; William T Peake; Saumil N Merchant
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.325

3.  Age effects in the human middle ear: wideband acoustical measures.

Authors:  M Patrick Feeney; Chris A Sanford
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Acoustics of the human middle-ear air space.

Authors:  Cara E Stepp; Susan E Voss
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Wideband reflectance norms for Caucasian and Chinese young adults.

Authors:  Navid Shahnaz; Karin Bork
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  Evaluation of human middle ear function via an acoustic power assessment.

Authors:  Jont B Allen; Patricia S Jeng; Harry Levitt
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  2005 Jul-Aug

7.  Toynbee Memorial Lecture 1997. Middle ear mechanics in normal, diseased and reconstructed ears.

Authors:  S N Merchant; M E Ravicz; S E Voss; W T Peake; J J Rosowski
Journal:  J Laryngol Otol       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 1.469

8.  Experimental ossicular fixations and the middle ear's response to sound: evidence for a flexible ossicular chain.

Authors:  Hideko Heidi Nakajima; Michael E Ravicz; Saumil N Merchant; William T Peake; John J Rosowski
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Estimation of acoustical energy reflectance at the eardrum from measurements of pressure distribution in the human ear canal.

Authors:  M R Stinson; E A Shaw; B W Lawton
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Audiometric predictions using stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions and middle ear measurements.

Authors:  John C Ellison; Douglas H Keefe
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.570

View more
  29 in total

1.  Reflectance measurement validation using acoustic horns.

Authors:  Daniel M Rasetshwane; Stephen T Neely
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Non-invasive estimation of middle-ear input impedance and efficiency.

Authors:  James D Lewis; Stephen T Neely
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Normative Wideband Reflectance, Equivalent Admittance at the Tympanic Membrane, and Acoustic Stapedius Reflex Threshold in Adults.

Authors:  M Patrick Feeney; Douglas H Keefe; Lisa L Hunter; Denis F Fitzpatrick; Angela C Garinis; Daniel B Putterman; Garnett P McMillan
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2017 May/Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  Predictions of middle-ear and passive cochlear mechanics using a finite element model of the pediatric ear.

Authors:  Xuelin Wang; Douglas H Keefe; Rong Z Gan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Factors affecting sound energy absorbance in acute otitis media model of chinchilla.

Authors:  Xiying Guan; Thomas W Seale; Rong Z Gan
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2017-04-10       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Wave motion on the surface of the human tympanic membrane: holographic measurement and modeling analysis.

Authors:  Jeffrey Tao Cheng; Mohamad Hamade; Saumil N Merchant; John J Rosowski; Ellery Harrington; Cosme Furlong
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  The Audiometric and Mechanical Effects of Partial Ossicular Discontinuity.

Authors:  Rosemary B Farahmand; Gabrielle R Merchant; Sarah A Lookabaugh; Christof Röösli; Cagatay H Ulku; Michael J McKenna; Ronald K de Venecia; Christopher F Halpin; John J Rosowski; Hideko H Nakajima
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Controlled exploration of the effects of conductive hearing loss on wideband acoustic immittance in human cadaveric preparations.

Authors:  Gabrielle R Merchant; Saumil N Merchant; John J Rosowski; Hideko Heidi Nakajima
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2016-08-03       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Investigation of bacterial biofilm in the human middle ear using optical coherence tomography and acoustic measurements.

Authors:  Cac T Nguyen; Sarah R Robinson; Woonggyu Jung; Michael A Novak; Stephen A Boppart; Jont B Allen
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2013-04-12       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Characterizing the ear canal acoustic impedance and reflectance by pole-zero fitting.

Authors:  Sarah R Robinson; Cac T Nguyen; Jont B Allen
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2013-03-22       Impact factor: 3.208

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.