Literature DB >> 15021770

Superior semicircular canal dehiscence presenting as conductive hearing loss without vertigo.

Anthony A Mikulec1, Michael J McKenna, Mitchell J Ramsey, John J Rosowski, Barbara S Herrmann, Steven D Rauch, Hugh D Curtin, Saumil N Merchant.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to describe superior semicircular canal dehiscence (SSCD) presenting as otherwise unexplained conductive hearing loss without vestibular symptoms. STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective.
SETTING: Tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: The study comprised 8 patients (10 ears), 5 males and 5 females aged 27 to 59 years. All 10 ears had SSCD on high-resolution computed tomography scan of the temporal bone. DIAGNOSTIC TESTS AND
RESULTS: All 10 ears had significant conductive hearing loss. The air-bone gaps were largest in the lower frequencies at 250, 500, and 1000 Hz; the mean gaps for these 3 frequencies for the 10 ears were 49, 37, and 35 dB, respectively. Bone-conduction thresholds below 2000 Hz were negative (-5 dB to -15 dB) at one or more frequencies in 8 of the 10 ears. There were no middle ear abnormalities to explain the air-bone gaps in these 10 ears. Computed tomography scan and laboratory testing indicated lack of middle ear pathology; acoustic reflexes were present, vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (VEMPs) were present with abnormally low thresholds, and umbo velocity measured by laser Doppler vibrometry was above mean normal. Middle ear exploration was negative in six ears; of these six, stapedectomy had been performed in three ears and ossiculoplasty in two ears, but the air-bone gap was unchanged postoperatively. The data are consistent with the hypothesis that the SSCD introduced a third mobile window into the inner ear, which in turn produced the conductive hearing loss by 1) shunting air-conducted sound away from the cochlea, thus elevating air-conduction thresholds; and 2) increasing the difference in impedance between the oval and round windows, thus improving thresholds for bone-conducted sound.
CONCLUSION: SSCD can present with a conductive hearing loss that mimics otosclerosis and could explain some cases of persistent conductive hearing loss after uneventful stapedectomy. Audiometric testing with attention to absolute bone-conduction thresholds, acoustic reflex testing, VEMP testing, laser vibrometry of the umbo, and computed tomograph scanning can help to identify patients with SSCD presenting with conductive hearing loss without vertigo.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15021770     DOI: 10.1097/00129492-200403000-00007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otol Neurotol        ISSN: 1531-7129            Impact factor:   2.311


  65 in total

1.  Superior canal dehiscence size: multivariate assessment of clinical impact.

Authors:  Wade W Chien; Kristen Janky; Lloyd B Minor; John P Carey
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 2.311

2.  Transient evoked otoacoustic emissions in superior canal dehiscence syndrome.

Authors:  Elsaeid M Thabet
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2010-06-26       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Clinical Characteristics of Posterior and Lateral Semicircular Canal Dehiscence.

Authors:  Marko Spasic; Andy Trang; Lawrance K Chung; Nolan Ung; Kimberly Thill; Golmah Zarinkhou; Quinton S Gopen; Isaac Yang
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2015-05-29

4.  The effect of superior canal dehiscence on cochlear potential in response to air-conducted stimuli in chinchilla.

Authors:  Jocelyn E Songer; John J Rosowski
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2005-09-08       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  The effect of superior-canal opening on middle-ear input admittance and air-conducted stapes velocity in chinchilla.

Authors:  Jocelyn E Songer; John J Rosowski
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Measurements of human middle- and inner-ear mechanics with dehiscence of the superior semicircular canal.

Authors:  Wade Chien; Michael E Ravicz; John J Rosowski; Saumil N Merchant
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 2.311

7.  A mechano-acoustic model of the effect of superior canal dehiscence on hearing in chinchilla.

Authors:  Jocelyn E Songer; John J Rosowski
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Histopathology of the temporal bone in a case of superior canal dehiscence syndrome.

Authors:  Michael Teixido; Brian Kung; John J Rosowski; Saumil N Merchant
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 1.547

9.  Superior canal dehiscence length and location influences clinical presentation and audiometric and cervical vestibular-evoked myogenic potential testing.

Authors:  Marlien E F Niesten; Leena M Hamberg; Joshua B Silverman; Kristina V Lou; Andrew A McCall; Alanna Windsor; Hugh D Curtin; Barbara S Herrmann; Wilko Grolman; Hideko H Nakajima; Daniel J Lee
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2014-01-09       Impact factor: 1.854

10.  Correlation of Superior Canal Dehiscence Surface Area With Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials, Audiometric Thresholds, and Dizziness Handicap.

Authors:  Jacob B Hunter; Brendan P O'Connell; Jianing Wang; Srijata Chakravorti; Katie Makowiec; Matthew L Carlson; Benoit Dawant; Devin L McCaslin; Jack H Noble; George B Wanna
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 2.311

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.