Literature DB >> 20520553

Wideband reflectance in newborns: normative regions and relationship to hearing-screening results.

Lisa L Hunter1, M Patrick Feeney, Judi A Lapsley Miller, Patricia S Jeng, Susie Bohning.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To develop normative data for wideband middle-ear reflectance in a newborn hearing-screening population and to compare test performance with 1-kHz tympanometry for prediction of otoacoustic emission (OAE) screening outcome.
DESIGN: Wideband middle-ear reflectance (using both tone and chirp stimuli from 0.2 to 6 kHz), 1-kHz tympanometry, and distortion-product (DP) OAEs were measured in 324 infants at two test sites. Ears were categorized into DP pass and DP refer groups.
RESULTS: Normative reflectance values were defined over various frequency regions for both tone and chirp stimuli in ambient pressure conditions, and for reflectance area indices integrated over various frequency ranges. Receiver operating characteristic analyses showed that reflectance provides the best discriminability of DP status in frequency ranges involving 2 kHz and greater discriminability of DP status than 1-kHz tympanometry. Repeated-measures analyses of variance established that (a) there were significant differences in reflectance as a function of DP status and frequency but not sex or ear; (b) tone and chirp stimulus reflectance values are essentially indistinguishable; and (c) newborns from two geographic sites had similar reflectance patterns above 1 kHz. Birth type and weight did not contribute to differences in reflectance.
CONCLUSIONS: Referrals in OAE-based infant hearing screening were strongly associated with increased wideband reflectance, suggesting middle-ear dysfunction at birth. Reflectance improved significantly during the first 4 days after birth with normalization of middle-ear function. Reflectance scores can be achieved within seconds using the same equipment used for OAE screening. Newborns with high reflectance scores at stage I screening should be rescreened within a few hours to a few days, because most middle-ear problems are transient and resolve spontaneously. If reflectance and OAE are not passed upon stage II screening, referral to an otologist for ear examination is suggested along with diagnostic testing. Newborns with normal reflectance and a refer result for the OAE screen should be referred immediately to an audiologist for diagnostic testing with threshold auditory brainstem response because of higher risk for permanent hearing loss.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20520553      PMCID: PMC3774543          DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181e40ca7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ear Hear        ISSN: 0196-0202            Impact factor:   3.570


  46 in total

1.  Newborn hearing screening with combined otoacoustic emissions and auditory brainstem responses.

Authors:  James W Hall; Steven D Smith; Gerald R Popelka
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 1.664

2.  Neonatal hearing screening with otoscopy, auditory brain stem response, and otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  K J Doyle; B Burggraaff; S Fujikawa; J Kim; C J MacArthur
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 3.497

3.  The New York State universal newborn hearing screening demonstration project: outpatient outcome measures.

Authors:  B Prieve; L Dalzell; A Berg; M Bradley; A Cacace; D Campbell; J DeCristofaro; J Gravel; E Greenberg; S Gross; M Orlando; J Pinheiro; J Regan; L Spivak; F Stevens
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases.

Authors:  J A Hanley; B J McNeil
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Failed newborn hearing screens as presentation for otitis media with effusion in the newborn population.

Authors:  Ryan T Boone; Charles M Bower; Patti F Martin
Journal:  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2004-12-30       Impact factor: 1.675

6.  The newborn with hearing loss: detection in the nursery.

Authors:  T Finitzo; K Albright; J O'Neal
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 7.124

7.  Sound-conduction effects on distortion-product otoacoustic emission screening outcomes in newborn infants: test performance of wideband acoustic transfer functions and 1-kHz tympanometry.

Authors:  Chris A Sanford; Douglas H Keefe; Yi-Wen Liu; Denis Fitzpatrick; Ryan W McCreery; Dawna E Lewis; Michael P Gorga
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Auditory brain stem responses to air- and bone-conducted clicks in the audiological assessment of at-risk infants.

Authors:  E Y Yang; A Stuart; G T Mencher; L S Mencher; M J Vincer
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Postnatal growth of the human temporal bone. Implications for cochlear implants in children.

Authors:  T L Eby; J B Nadol
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  1986 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.547

10.  Effects of maturation on tympanometric wideband acoustic transfer functions in human infants.

Authors:  Chris A Sanford; M Patrick Feeney
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 2.482

View more
  23 in total

1.  Clinical benefit of wideband-tympanometry: a pediatric audiology clinical study.

Authors:  Laura Stuppert; Sabine Nospes; Andrea Bohnert; Anne Katrin Läßig; Annette Limberger; Tobias Rader
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2019-06-07       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Finite-Element Modelling of the Acoustic Input Admittance of the Newborn Ear Canal and Middle Ear.

Authors:  Hamid Motallebzadeh; Nima Maftoon; Jacob Pitaro; W Robert J Funnell; Sam J Daniel
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2016-10-07

3.  Factors affecting sound energy absorbance in acute otitis media model of chinchilla.

Authors:  Xiying Guan; Thomas W Seale; Rong Z Gan
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2017-04-10       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Wideband acoustic transfer functions predict middle-ear effusion.

Authors:  John C Ellison; Michael Gorga; Edward Cohn; Denis Fitzpatrick; Chris A Sanford; Douglas H Keefe
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2012-02-28       Impact factor: 3.325

5.  Longitudinal Development of Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emissions in Infants With Normal Hearing.

Authors:  Lisa L Hunter; Chelsea M Blankenship; Douglas H Keefe; M Patrick Feeney; David K Brown; Annie McCune; Denis F Fitzpatrick; Li Lin
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2018 Sep/Oct       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  Effects of middle-ear disorders on power reflectance measured in cadaveric ear canals.

Authors:  Susan E Voss; Gabrielle R Merchant; Nicholas J Horton
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2012 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

Review 7.  Current audiological diagnostics.

Authors:  Sebastian Hoth; Izet Baljić
Journal:  GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2017-12-18

8.  Investigation of bacterial biofilm in the human middle ear using optical coherence tomography and acoustic measurements.

Authors:  Cac T Nguyen; Sarah R Robinson; Woonggyu Jung; Michael A Novak; Stephen A Boppart; Jont B Allen
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2013-04-12       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Characterizing the ear canal acoustic impedance and reflectance by pole-zero fitting.

Authors:  Sarah R Robinson; Cac T Nguyen; Jont B Allen
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2013-03-22       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Wideband aural acoustic absorbance predicts conductive hearing loss in children.

Authors:  Douglas H Keefe; Chris A Sanford; John C Ellison; Denis F Fitzpatrick; Michael P Gorga
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2012-10-16       Impact factor: 2.117

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.