Literature DB >> 26328714

Non-invasive estimation of middle-ear input impedance and efficiency.

James D Lewis1, Stephen T Neely1.   

Abstract

A method to transform the impedance measured in the ear canal, ZEC, to the plane of the eardrum, ZED, is described. The portion of the canal between the probe and eardrum was modeled as a concatenated series of conical segments, allowing for spatial variations in its cross-sectional area. A model of the middle ear (ME) and cochlea terminated the ear-canal model, which permitted estimation of ME efficiency. Acoustic measurements of ZEC were made at two probe locations in 15 normal-hearing subjects. ZEC was sensitive to measurement location, especially near frequencies of canal resonances and anti-resonances. Transforming ZEC to ZED reduced the influence of the canal, decreasing insertion-depth sensitivity of ZED between 1 and 12 kHz compared to ZEC. Absorbance, A, was less sensitive to probe placement than ZEC, but more sensitive than ZED above 5 kHz. ZED and A were similarly insensitive to probe placement between 1 and 5 kHz. The probe-placement sensitivity of ZED below 1 kHz was not reduced from that of either A or ZEC. ME efficiency had a bandpass shape with greatest efficiency between 1 and 4 kHz. Estimates of ZED and ME efficiency could extend the diagnostic capability of wideband-acoustic immittance measurements.

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26328714      PMCID: PMC4545079          DOI: 10.1121/1.4927408

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  36 in total

1.  Middle-ear function with tympanic-membrane perforations. II. A simple model.

Authors:  S E Voss; J J Rosowski; S N Merchant; W T Peake
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Middle-ear function with tympanic-membrane perforations. I. Measurements and mechanisms.

Authors:  S E Voss; J J Rosowski; S N Merchant; W T Peake
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Energy reflectance and tympanometry in normal and otosclerotic ears.

Authors:  Navid Shahnaz; Karin Bork; Linda Polka; Neil Longridge; Desmond Bell; Brian D Westerberg
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  Comparison of in-situ calibration methods for quantifying input to the middle ear.

Authors:  James D Lewis; Ryan W McCreery; Stephen T Neely; Patricia G Stelmachowicz
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Acoustical transmission-line model of the middle-ear cavities and mastoid air cells.

Authors:  Douglas H Keefe
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Specification of the geometry of the human ear canal for the prediction of sound-pressure level distribution.

Authors:  M R Stinson; B W Lawton
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Effects of middle-ear disorders on power reflectance measured in cadaveric ear canals.

Authors:  Susan E Voss; Gabrielle R Merchant; Nicholas J Horton
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2012 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Revised estimate of minimum audible pressure: where is the "missing 6 dB"?

Authors:  M C Killion
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1978-05       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Measurement of the acoustic input immittance of the human ear.

Authors:  W M Rabinowitz
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1981-10       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Ear-canal reflectance, umbo velocity, and tympanometry in normal-hearing adults.

Authors:  John J Rosowski; Hideko H Nakajima; Mohamad A Hamade; Lorice Mahfoud; Gabrielle R Merchant; Christopher F Halpin; Saumil N Merchant
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2012 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.570

View more
  6 in total

1.  Sound pressure distribution within human ear canals: II. Reverse mechanical stimulation.

Authors:  Michael E Ravicz; Jeffrey Tao Cheng; John J Rosowski
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Compensating for ear-canal acoustics when measuring otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Karolina K Charaziak; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Effect of Middle-Ear Pathology on High-Frequency Ear Canal Reflectance Measurements in the Frequency and Time Domains.

Authors:  Gabrielle R Merchant; Jonathan H Siegel; Stephen T Neely; John J Rosowski; Hideko H Nakajima
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2019-10-31

4.  On the calculation of reflectance in non-uniform ear canals.

Authors:  Kren Rahbek Nørgaard; Karolina K Charaziak; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  The influence of otitis media with effusion on middle-ear impedance estimated from wideband acoustic immittance measurements.

Authors:  Gabrielle R Merchant; Stephen T Neely
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2021-08       Impact factor: 2.482

6.  A systematic study on effects of calibration-waveguide geometry and least-squares formulation on ear-probe source calibrations.

Authors:  Kren Monrad Nørgaard; Joshua J Hajicek
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2022-01       Impact factor: 1.840

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.