Literature DB >> 26520306

Reflectance measurement validation using acoustic horns.

Daniel M Rasetshwane1, Stephen T Neely1.   

Abstract

Variability in wideband acoustic reflectance (and absorbance) measurements adversely affects the clinical utility of reflectance for diagnosis of middle-ear disorders. A reflectance standard would encourage consistency across different measurement systems and help identify calibration related issues. Theoretical equations exist for the reflectance of finite-length exponential, conical, and parabolic acoustic horns. Reflectance measurements were repeatedly made in each of these three horn shapes and the results were compared to the corresponding theoretical reflectance. A method is described of adjusting acoustic impedance measurements to compensate for spreading of the wave front that propagates from the small diameter sound port of the probe to the larger diameter of the acoustic cavity. Agreement between measured and theoretical reflectance was less than 1 dB at most frequencies in the range from 0.2 to 10 kHz. Pearson correlation coefficients were greater than 0.95 between measured and theoretical time-domain reflectance within the flare region of the horns. The agreement suggests that the distributed reflectance of acoustic horns may be useful for validating reflectance measurements made in human ear canals; however, refinements to reflectance measurement methods may still be needed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26520306      PMCID: PMC4617734          DOI: 10.1121/1.4930948

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  19 in total

1.  A noninvasive method for estimating acoustic admittance at the tympanic membrane.

Authors:  G T Huang; J J Rosowski; S Puria; W T Peake
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Inverse solution of ear-canal area function from reflectance.

Authors:  Daniel M Rasetshwane; Stephen T Neely
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Method to measure acoustic impedance and reflection coefficient.

Authors:  D H Keefe; R Ling; J C Bulen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 4.  Wideband acoustic immittance normative data: ethnicity, gender, aging, and instrumentation.

Authors:  Navid Shahnaz; M Patrick Feeney; Kim S Schairer
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  Intrasubject variability in power reflectance.

Authors:  Defne Abur; Nicholas J Horton; Susan E Voss
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 1.664

6.  Effects of middle-ear disorders on power reflectance measured in cadaveric ear canals.

Authors:  Susan E Voss; Gabrielle R Merchant; Nicholas J Horton
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2012 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  Identification of neonatal hearing impairment: ear-canal measurements of acoustic admittance and reflectance in neonates.

Authors:  D H Keefe; R C Folsom; M P Gorga; B R Vohr; J C Bulen; S J Norton
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 3.570

Review 8.  Factors that introduce intrasubject variability into ear-canal absorbance measurements.

Authors:  Susan E Voss; Stefan Stenfelt; Stephen T Neely; John J Rosowski
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Ear-canal reflectance, umbo velocity, and tympanometry in normal-hearing adults.

Authors:  John J Rosowski; Hideko H Nakajima; Mohamad A Hamade; Lorice Mahfoud; Gabrielle R Merchant; Christopher F Halpin; Saumil N Merchant
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2012 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.570

Review 10.  An overview of wideband immittance measurements techniques and terminology: you say absorbance, I say reflectance.

Authors:  John J Rosowski; Stefan Stenfelt; David Lilly
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 3.570

View more
  1 in total

1.  Sound pressure distribution within human ear canals: II. Reverse mechanical stimulation.

Authors:  Michael E Ravicz; Jeffrey Tao Cheng; John J Rosowski
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 1.840

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.