Literature DB >> 21799023

Examining the influence of task set on eye movements and fixations.

Mark Mills1, Andrew Hollingworth, Stefan Van der Stigchel, Lesa Hoffman, Michael D Dodd.   

Abstract

The purpose of the present study was to examine the influence of task set on the spatial and temporal characteristics of eye movements during scene perception. In previous work, when strong control was exerted over the viewing task via specification of a target object (as in visual search), task set biased spatial, rather than temporal, parameters of eye movements. Here, we find that more participant-directed tasks (in which the task establishes general goals of viewing rather than specific objects to fixate) affect not only spatial (e.g., saccade amplitude) but also temporal parameters (e.g., fixation duration). Further, task set influenced the rate of change in fixation duration over the course of viewing but not saccade amplitude, suggesting independent mechanisms for control of these parameters. © ARVO

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21799023      PMCID: PMC3163592          DOI: 10.1167/11.8.17

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  28 in total

1.  To see and remember: visually specific information is retained in memory from previously attended objects in natural scenes.

Authors:  A Hollingworth; C C Williams; J M Henderson
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2001-12

2.  Multilevel models for the experimental psychologist: foundations and illustrative examples.

Authors:  Lesa Hoffman; Michael J Rovine
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2007-02

3.  Eye movements during scene viewing: evidence for mixed control of fixation durations.

Authors:  John M Henderson; Pierce L Graham
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2008-06

4.  Stable individual differences across images in human saccadic eye movements.

Authors:  Monica S Castelhano; John M Henderson
Journal:  Can J Exp Psychol       Date:  2008-03

5.  The guidance of eye movements during active visual search.

Authors:  B C Motter; E J Belky
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Different programming modes of human saccadic eye movements as a function of stimulus eccentricity: indications of a functional subdivision of the visual field.

Authors:  D Frost; E Pöppel
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1976-06-18       Impact factor: 2.086

7.  The time course of picture viewing.

Authors:  J R Antes
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1974-07

8.  Differential acquisition rates for different types of information from pictures.

Authors:  G R Loftus; W W Nelson; H J Kallman
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  1983-02

9.  Novelty is not always the best policy: inhibition of return and facilitation of return as a function of visual task.

Authors:  Michael D Dodd; Stefan Van der Stigchel; Andrew Hollingworth
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2009-02-13

10.  Human gaze control during real-world scene perception.

Authors:  John M Henderson
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 20.229

View more
  34 in total

1.  A Generative Model of Cognitive State from Task and Eye Movements.

Authors:  W Joseph MacInnes; Amelia R Hunt; Alasdair D F Clarke; Michael D Dodd
Journal:  Cognit Comput       Date:  2018-05-09       Impact factor: 5.418

Review 2.  Learning emergent behaviours for a hierarchical Bayesian framework for active robotic perception.

Authors:  João Filipe Ferreira; Christiana Tsiourti; Jorge Dias
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2012-08

3.  The spatial distribution of attention predicts familiarity strength during encoding and retrieval.

Authors:  Michelle M Ramey; John M Henderson; Andrew P Yonelinas
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2020-04-06

4.  Cerebral hemodynamics during scene viewing: Hemispheric lateralization predicts temporal gaze behavior associated with distinct modes of visual processing.

Authors:  Mark Mills; Mohammed Alwatban; Benjamin Hage; Erin Barney; Edward J Truemper; Gregory R Bashford; Michael D Dodd
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2017-03-13       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Human classifier: Observers can deduce task solely from eye movements.

Authors:  Brett Bahle; Mark Mills; Michael D Dodd
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Novel names extend for how long preschool children sample visual information.

Authors:  Paulo F Carvalho; Catarina Vales; Caitlin M Fausey; Linda B Smith
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  2017-12-26

7.  Effects of task and task-switching on temporal inhibition of return, facilitation of return, and saccadic momentum during scene viewing.

Authors:  Mark Mills; Edwin S Dalmaijer; Stefan Van der Stigchel; Michael D Dodd
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2015-06-15       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Functional Transcranial Doppler Ultrasound for Measurement of Hemispheric Lateralization During Visual Memory and Visual Search Cognitive Tasks.

Authors:  Benjamin Hage; Mohammed R Alwatban; Erin Barney; Mark Mills; Michael D Dodd; Edward J Truemper; Gregory R Bashford
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2016-08-26       Impact factor: 2.725

9.  Gaze distribution analysis and saliency prediction across age groups.

Authors:  Onkar Krishna; Andrea Helo; Pia Rämä; Kiyoharu Aizawa
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-02-23       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Task-Dependent Eye-Movement Patterns in Viewing Art.

Authors:  Nino Sharvashidze; Alexander C Schütz
Journal:  J Eye Mov Res       Date:  2020-12-16       Impact factor: 0.957

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.