Literature DB >> 26076175

Effects of task and task-switching on temporal inhibition of return, facilitation of return, and saccadic momentum during scene viewing.

Mark Mills1, Edwin S Dalmaijer2, Stefan Van der Stigchel2, Michael D Dodd1.   

Abstract

During scene viewing, saccades directed toward a recently fixated location tend to be delayed relative to saccades in other directions ("delay effect"), an effect attributable to inhibition of return (IOR) and/or saccadic momentum (SM). Previous work indicates this effect may be task-specific, suggesting that gaze control parameters are task-relevant and potentially affected by task-switching. Accordingly, the present study investigated task-set control of gaze behavior using the delay effect as a measure of task performance. The delay effect was measured as the effect of relative saccade direction on preceding fixation duration. Participants were cued on each trial to perform either a search, memory, or rating task. Tasks were performed either in pure-task or mixed-task blocks. This design allowed separation of switch-cost and mixing-cost. The critical result was that expression of the delay effect at 2-back locations was reversed on switch versus repeat trials such that return was delayed in repeat trials but speeded in switch trials. This difference between repeat and switch trials suggests that gaze-relevant parameters may be represented and switched as part of a task-set. Existing and new tests for dissociating IOR and SM accounts of the delay effect converged on the conclusion that the delay at 2-back locations was due to SM, and that task-switching affects SM. Additionally, the new test simultaneously replicated noncorroborating results in the literature regarding facilitation-of-return (FOR), which confirmed its existence and showed that FOR is "reversed" SM that occurs when preceding and current saccades are both directed toward the 2-back location. (c) 2015 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26076175      PMCID: PMC4586309          DOI: 10.1037/xhp0000076

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  40 in total

1.  Changing internal constraints on action: the role of backward inhibition.

Authors:  U Mayr; S W Keele
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2000-03

2.  On the strategic modulation of the time course of facilitation and inhibition of return.

Authors:  J Lupiáñez; B Milliken; C Solano; B Weaver; S P Tipper
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  2001-08

3.  Task-set switching and long-term memory retrieval.

Authors:  U Mayr; R Kliegl
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  Influence of previous visual stimulus or saccade on saccadic reaction times in monkey.

Authors:  M C Dorris; T L Taylor; R M Klein; D P Munoz
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Looking back at Waldo: oculomotor inhibition of return does not prevent return fixations.

Authors:  Tim J Smith; John M Henderson
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-01-04       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Involuntary retrieval in alphabet-arithmetic tasks: task-mixing and task-switching costs.

Authors:  Iring Koch; Wolfgang Prinz; Alan Allport
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2004-06-26

7.  Examining task difficulty and the time course of inhibition of return: detecting perceptually degraded targets.

Authors:  Alan D Castel; Jay Pratt; Alison L Chasteen; Charles T Scialfa
Journal:  Can J Exp Psychol       Date:  2005-06

8.  Novelty is not always the best policy: inhibition of return and facilitation of return as a function of visual task.

Authors:  Michael D Dodd; Stefan Van der Stigchel; Andrew Hollingworth
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2009-02-13

9.  Human gaze control during real-world scene perception.

Authors:  John M Henderson
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 20.229

10.  Saccadic momentum and facilitation of return saccades contribute to an optimal foraging strategy.

Authors:  Niklas Wilming; Simon Harst; Nico Schmidt; Peter König
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2013-01-17       Impact factor: 4.475

View more
  4 in total

1.  Cerebral hemodynamics during scene viewing: Hemispheric lateralization predicts temporal gaze behavior associated with distinct modes of visual processing.

Authors:  Mark Mills; Mohammed Alwatban; Benjamin Hage; Erin Barney; Edward J Truemper; Gregory R Bashford; Michael D Dodd
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2017-03-13       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  MouseView.js: Reliable and valid attention tracking in web-based experiments using a cursor-directed aperture.

Authors:  Alexander L Anwyl-Irvine; Thomas Armstrong; Edwin S Dalmaijer
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2021-09-29

3.  Saccadic momentum and attentive control in V4 neurons during visual search.

Authors:  Brad C Motter
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Machine learning-based classification of viewing behavior using a wide range of statistical oculomotor features.

Authors:  Timo Kootstra; Jonas Teuwen; Jeroen Goudsmit; Tanja Nijboer; Michael Dodd; Stefan Van der Stigchel
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2020-09-02       Impact factor: 2.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.