Literature DB >> 33828788

Task-Dependent Eye-Movement Patterns in Viewing Art.

Nino Sharvashidze1, Alexander C Schütz1.   

Abstract

In art schools and classes for art history students are trained to pay attention to different aspects of an artwork, such as art movement characteristics and painting techniques. Experts are better at processing style and visual features of an artwork than nonprofessionals. Here we tested the hypothesis that experts in art use different, task-dependent viewing strategies than nonprofessionals when analyzing a piece of art. We compared a group of art history students with a group of students with no art education background, while viewing 36 paintings under three discrimination tasks. Participants were asked to determine the art movement, the date and the medium of the paintings. We analyzed behavioral and eye-movement data of 27 participants. Our observers adjusted their viewing strategies according to the task, resulting in longer fixation durations and shorter saccade amplitudes for the medium detection task. We found higher task accuracy and subjective confidence, less congruence and higher dispersion in fixation locations in experts. Expertise also influenced saccade metrics, biasing it towards larger saccade amplitudes, advocating a more holistic scanning strategy of experts in all three tasks.

Entities:  

Keywords:  art perception; confidence; expertise; eye movements; eye tracking; scanpath; task-dependent viewing; viewing strategies

Year:  2020        PMID: 33828788      PMCID: PMC7962786          DOI: 10.16910/jemr.13.2.12

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Eye Mov Res        ISSN: 1995-8692            Impact factor:   0.957


  53 in total

1.  Holistic component of image perception in mammogram interpretation: gaze-tracking study.

Authors:  Harold L Kundel; Calvin F Nodine; Emily F Conant; Susan P Weinstein
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Task-demands can immediately reverse the effects of sensory-driven saliency in complex visual stimuli.

Authors:  Wolfgang Einhäuser; Ueli Rutishauser; Christof Koch
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2008-02-15       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  The central fixation bias in scene viewing: selecting an optimal viewing position independently of motor biases and image feature distributions.

Authors:  Benjamin W Tatler
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2007-11-21       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Faces and text attract gaze independent of the task: Experimental data and computer model.

Authors:  Moran Cerf; E Paxon Frady; Christof Koch
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-11-18       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Does gravity matter? Effects of semantic and syntactic inconsistencies on the allocation of attention during scene perception.

Authors:  Melissa L-H Võ; John M Henderson
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-03-27       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Contextual cueing: implicit learning and memory of visual context guides spatial attention.

Authors:  M M Chun; Y Jiang
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Defending Yarbus: eye movements reveal observers' task.

Authors:  Ali Borji; Laurent Itti
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-03-24       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  Meaning-based guidance of attention in scenes as revealed by meaning maps.

Authors:  John M Henderson; Taylor R Hayes
Journal:  Nat Hum Behav       Date:  2017-09-25

9.  Examining the influence of task set on eye movements and fixations.

Authors:  Mark Mills; Andrew Hollingworth; Stefan Van der Stigchel; Lesa Hoffman; Michael D Dodd
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-07-28       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  The Effect of Art Expertise on Eye Fixation-Related Potentials During Aesthetic Judgment Task in Focal and Ambient Modes.

Authors:  Agnieszka Fudali-Czyż; Piotr Francuz; Paweł Augustynowicz
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-10-16
View more
  1 in total

1.  Titles and Semantic Violations Affect Eye Movements When Viewing Contemporary Paintings.

Authors:  Joanna Ganczarek; Karolina Pietras; Anna Stolińska; Magdalena Szubielska
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2022-03-04       Impact factor: 3.169

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.