Literature DB >> 32250136

The spatial distribution of attention predicts familiarity strength during encoding and retrieval.

Michelle M Ramey1, John M Henderson1, Andrew P Yonelinas1.   

Abstract

The memories we form are determined by what we attend to, and conversely, what we attend to is influenced by our memory for past experiences. Although we know that shifts of attention via eye movements are related to memory during encoding and retrieval, the role of specific memory processes in this relationship is unclear. There is evidence that attention may be especially important for some forms of memory (i.e., conscious recollection), and less so for others (i.e., familiarity-based recognition and unconscious influences of memory), but results are conflicting with respect to both the memory processes and eye movement patterns involved. To address this, we used a confidence-based method of isolating eye movement indices of spatial attention that are related to different memory processes (i.e., recollection, familiarity strength, and unconscious memory) during encoding and retrieval of real-world scenes. We also developed a new method of measuring the dispersion of eye movements, which proved to be more sensitive to memory processing than previously used measures. Specifically, in 2 studies, we found that familiarity strength-that is, changes in subjective reports of memory confidence-increased with (a) more dispersed patterns of viewing during encoding, (b) less dispersed viewing during retrieval, and (c) greater overlap in regions viewed between encoding and retrieval (i.e., resampling). Recollection was also related to these eye movements in a similar manner, though the associations with recollection were less consistent across experiments. Furthermore, we found no evidence for effects related to unconscious influences of memory. These findings indicate that attentional processes during viewing may not preferentially relate to recollection, and that the spatial distribution of eye movements is directly related to familiarity-based memory during encoding and retrieval. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32250136      PMCID: PMC7541439          DOI: 10.1037/xge0000758

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen        ISSN: 0022-1015


  43 in total

1.  Eye-movement-based memory effect: a reprocessing effect in face perception.

Authors:  R R Althoff; N J Cohen
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 3.051

2.  Eye movements and visual memory: detecting changes to saccade targets in scenes.

Authors:  John M Henderson; Andrew Hollingworth
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2003-01

3.  Fixation-dependent memory for natural scenes: an experimental test of scanpath theory.

Authors:  Tom Foulsham; Alan Kingstone
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2012-04-16

4.  Recognition memory strength is predicted by pupillary responses at encoding while fixation patterns distinguish recollection from familiarity.

Authors:  Alexandros Kafkas; Daniela Montaldi
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2011-08-15       Impact factor: 2.143

Review 5.  The limits of top-down control of visual attention.

Authors:  Stefan Van der Stigchel; Artem V Belopolsky; Judith C Peters; Jasper G Wijnen; Martijn Meeter; Jan Theeuwes
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2009-07-26

6.  Worth a glance: using eye movements to investigate the cognitive neuroscience of memory.

Authors:  Deborah E Hannula; Robert R Althoff; David E Warren; Lily Riggs; Neal J Cohen; Jennifer D Ryan
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2010-10-08       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  Memory for scenes: refixations reflect retrieval.

Authors:  Linus Holm; Timo Mäntylä
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-10

8.  The eyes have it: hippocampal activity predicts expression of memory in eye movements.

Authors:  Deborah E Hannula; Charan Ranganath
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2009-09-10       Impact factor: 17.173

9.  When eye movements express memory for old and new scenes in the absence of awareness and independent of hippocampus.

Authors:  Christine N Smith; Larry R Squire
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2017-01-17       Impact factor: 2.460

10.  Meaning guides attention in real-world scene images: Evidence from eye movements and meaning maps.

Authors:  John M Henderson; Taylor R Hayes
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 2.240

View more
  3 in total

1.  The extent and specificity of visual exploration determines the formation of recollected memories in complex scenes.

Authors:  Nico Broers; Wilma A Bainbridge; René Michel; Elio Balestrieri; Niko A Busch
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2022-10-04       Impact factor: 2.004

2.  Why do we retrace our visual steps? Semantic and episodic memory in gaze reinstatement.

Authors:  Michelle M Ramey; Andrew P Yonelinas; John M Henderson
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2020-06-15       Impact factor: 2.460

3.  Overt attentional correlates of memorability of scene images and their relationships to scene semantics.

Authors:  Muxuan Lyu; Kyoung Whan Choe; Omid Kardan; Hiroki P Kotabe; John M Henderson; Marc G Berman
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2020-09-02       Impact factor: 2.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.