Literature DB >> 18567256

Eye movements during scene viewing: evidence for mixed control of fixation durations.

John M Henderson1, Pierce L Graham.   

Abstract

Recent behavioral and computational research on eye movement control during scene viewing has focused on where the eyes move. However, fixations also differ in their durations, and when the eyes move may be another important indicator of perceptual and cognitive activity. Here we used a scene onset delay paradigm to investigate the degree to which individual fixation durations are under direct moment-to-moment control of the viewer's current visual scene. During saccades just prior to critical fixations, the scene was removed from view so that when the eyes landed, no scene was present. Following a manipulated delay period, the scene was restored to view. We found that one population of fixations was under the direct control of the current scene, increasing in duration as delay increased. A second population of fixations was relatively constant across delay. The pattern of data did not change whether delay duration was random or blocked, suggesting that the effects were not under the strategic control of the viewer. The results support a mixed control model in which the durations of some fixations proceed regardless of scene presence, whereas others are under the direct moment-to-moment control of ongoing scene analysis.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18567256     DOI: 10.3758/pbr.15.3.566

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  20 in total

Review 1.  A model of saccade generation based on parallel processing and competitive inhibition.

Authors:  J M Findlay; R Walker
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 12.579

2.  To see and remember: visually specific information is retained in memory from previously attended objects in natural scenes.

Authors:  A Hollingworth; C C Williams; J M Henderson
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2001-12

3.  Eye movements and visual memory: detecting changes to saccade targets in scenes.

Authors:  John M Henderson; Andrew Hollingworth
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2003-01

4.  Scene content selected by active vision.

Authors:  Derrick J Parkhurst; Ernst Niebur
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  2003

5.  SWIFT: a dynamical model of saccade generation during reading.

Authors:  Ralf Engbert; Antje Nuthmann; Eike M Richter; Reinhold Kliegl
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 8.934

6.  Contextual guidance of eye movements and attention in real-world scenes: the role of global features in object search.

Authors:  Antonio Torralba; Aude Oliva; Monica S Castelhano; John M Henderson
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 8.934

7.  The long and the short of it: spatial statistics at fixation vary with saccade amplitude and task.

Authors:  Benjamin W Tatler; Roland J Baddeley; Benjamin T Vincent
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2006-02-15       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Adjustment of fixation duration in visual search.

Authors:  I T Hooge; C J Erkelens
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Postsaccadic processing of the retinal image during picture scanning.

Authors:  S Shioiri
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1993-03

10.  Human gaze control during real-world scene perception.

Authors:  John M Henderson
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 20.229

View more
  27 in total

Review 1.  On the mental representations originating during the interaction between language and vision.

Authors:  Ramesh Kumar Mishra; Fernando Marmolejo-Ramos
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2010-05-06

2.  Microsaccades are different from saccades in scene perception.

Authors:  Konstantin Mergenthaler; Ralf Engbert
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-05-14       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  The effect of varying talker identity and listening conditions on gaze behavior during audiovisual speech perception.

Authors:  Julie N Buchan; Martin Paré; Kevin G Munhall
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2008-06-28       Impact factor: 3.252

4.  Cerebral hemodynamics during scene viewing: Hemispheric lateralization predicts temporal gaze behavior associated with distinct modes of visual processing.

Authors:  Mark Mills; Mohammed Alwatban; Benjamin Hage; Erin Barney; Edward J Truemper; Gregory R Bashford; Michael D Dodd
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2017-03-13       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 5.  Eye guidance in natural vision: reinterpreting salience.

Authors:  Benjamin W Tatler; Mary M Hayhoe; Michael F Land; Dana H Ballard
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-05-27       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Examining the influence of task set on eye movements and fixations.

Authors:  Mark Mills; Andrew Hollingworth; Stefan Van der Stigchel; Lesa Hoffman; Michael D Dodd
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-07-28       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Evidence for direct control of eye movements during reading.

Authors:  Michael Dambacher; Timothy J Slattery; Jinmian Yang; Reinhold Kliegl; Keith Rayner
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2013-02-18       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Eye movements and visual encoding during scene perception.

Authors:  Keith Rayner; Tim J Smith; George L Malcolm; John M Henderson
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2008-11-25

9.  New insights into ambient and focal visual fixations using an automatic classification algorithm.

Authors:  Brice Follet; Olivier Le Meur; Thierry Baccino
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2011-10-14

10.  Temporal oculomotor inhibition of return and spatial facilitation of return in a visual encoding task.

Authors:  Steven G Luke; Joseph Schmidt; John M Henderson
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-07-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.