Literature DB >> 28493106

Human classifier: Observers can deduce task solely from eye movements.

Brett Bahle1, Mark Mills2, Michael D Dodd2.   

Abstract

Computer classifiers have been successful at classifying various tasks using eye movement statistics. However, the question of human classification of task from eye movements has rarely been studied. Across two experiments, we examined whether humans could classify task based solely on the eye movements of other individuals. In Experiment 1, human classifiers were shown one of three sets of eye movements: Fixations, which were displayed as blue circles, with larger circles meaning longer fixation durations; Scanpaths, which were displayed as yellow arrows; and Videos, in which a neon green dot moved around the screen. There was an additional Scene manipulation in which eye movement properties were displayed either on the original scene where the task (Search, Memory, or Rating) was performed or on a black background in which no scene information was available. Experiment 2 used similar methods but only displayed Fixations and Videos with the same Scene manipulation. The results of both experiments showed successful classification of Search. Interestingly, Search was best classified in the absence of the original scene, particularly in the Fixation condition. Memory also was classified above chance with the strongest classification occurring with Videos in the presence of the scene. Additional analyses on the pattern of correct responses in these two conditions demonstrated which eye movement properties successful classifiers were using. These findings demonstrate conditions under which humans can extract information from eye movement characteristics in addition to providing insight into the relative success/failure of previous computer classifiers.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Categorization; Cognitive; Eye movements; Visual search

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28493106      PMCID: PMC6074025          DOI: 10.3758/s13414-017-1324-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 1943-3921            Impact factor:   2.199


  13 in total

1.  A saliency-based search mechanism for overt and covert shifts of visual attention.

Authors:  L Itti; C Koch
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Task-demands can immediately reverse the effects of sensory-driven saliency in complex visual stimuli.

Authors:  Wolfgang Einhäuser; Ueli Rutishauser; Christof Koch
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2008-02-15       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Searching in the dark: cognitive relevance drives attention in real-world scenes.

Authors:  John M Henderson; George L Malcolm; Charles Schandl
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-10

4.  Eye can read your mind: decoding gaze fixations to reveal categorical search targets.

Authors:  Gregory J Zelinsky; Yifan Peng; Dimitris Samaras
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-12-12       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Examining the influence of task set on eye movements and fixations.

Authors:  Mark Mills; Andrew Hollingworth; Stefan Van der Stigchel; Lesa Hoffman; Michael D Dodd
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-07-28       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Are eyes windows to a deceiver's soul? Children's use of another's eye gaze cues in a deceptive situation.

Authors:  Alejo Freire; Michelle Eskritt; Kang Lee
Journal:  Dev Psychol       Date:  2004-11

7.  Reconsidering Yarbus: a failure to predict observers' task from eye movement patterns.

Authors:  Michelle R Greene; Tommy Liu; Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2012-04-02       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Novelty is not always the best policy: inhibition of return and facilitation of return as a function of visual task.

Authors:  Michael D Dodd; Stefan Van der Stigchel; Andrew Hollingworth
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2009-02-13

9.  Where have eye been? Observers can recognise their own fixations.

Authors:  Tom Foulsham; Alan Kingstone
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 1.490

10.  Predicting cognitive state from eye movements.

Authors:  John M Henderson; Svetlana V Shinkareva; Jing Wang; Steven G Luke; Jenn Olejarczyk
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  3 in total

1.  A Generative Model of Cognitive State from Task and Eye Movements.

Authors:  W Joseph MacInnes; Amelia R Hunt; Alasdair D F Clarke; Michael D Dodd
Journal:  Cognit Comput       Date:  2018-05-09       Impact factor: 5.418

Review 2.  Eye Movements in Medical Image Perception: A Selective Review of Past, Present and Future.

Authors:  Chia-Chien Wu; Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  Vision (Basel)       Date:  2019-06-20

3.  Machine learning-based classification of viewing behavior using a wide range of statistical oculomotor features.

Authors:  Timo Kootstra; Jonas Teuwen; Jeroen Goudsmit; Tanja Nijboer; Michael Dodd; Stefan Van der Stigchel
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2020-09-02       Impact factor: 2.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.