Literature DB >> 24116426

Behavioral measures of cochlear compression and temporal resolution as predictors of speech masking release in hearing-impaired listeners.

Melanie J Gregan1, Peggy B Nelson, Andrew J Oxenham.   

Abstract

Hearing-impaired (HI) listeners often show less masking release (MR) than normal-hearing listeners when temporal fluctuations are imposed on a steady-state masker, even when accounting for overall audibility differences. This difference may be related to a loss of cochlear compression in HI listeners. Behavioral estimates of compression, using temporal masking curves (TMCs), were compared with MR for band-limited (500-4000 Hz) speech and pure tones in HI listeners and age-matched, noise-masked normal-hearing (NMNH) listeners. Compression and pure-tone MR estimates were made at 500, 1500, and 4000 Hz. The amount of MR was defined as the difference in performance between steady-state and 10-Hz square-wave-gated speech-shaped noise. In addition, temporal resolution was estimated from the slope of the off-frequency TMC. No significant relationship was found between estimated cochlear compression and MR for either speech or pure tones. NMNH listeners had significantly steeper off-frequency temporal masking recovery slopes than did HI listeners, and a small but significant correlation was observed between poorer temporal resolution and reduced MR for speech. The results suggest either that the effects of hearing impairment on MR are not determined primarily by changes in peripheral compression, or that the TMC does not provide a sufficiently reliable measure of cochlear compression.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24116426      PMCID: PMC3799689          DOI: 10.1121/1.4818773

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  62 in total

Review 1.  Responses to sound of the basilar membrane of the mammalian cochlea.

Authors:  M A Ruggero
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 6.627

2.  Modulation detection, modulation masking, and speech understanding in noise in the elderly.

Authors:  G A Takahashi; S P Bacon
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1992-12

3.  Effects of fluctuating noise and interfering speech on the speech-reception threshold for impaired and normal hearing.

Authors:  J M Festen; R Plomp
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Phase effects in masking related to dispersion in the inner ear. II. Masking period patterns of short targets.

Authors:  A Kohlrausch; A Sander
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Gap detection and the auditory filter: phase effects using sinusoidal stimuli.

Authors:  M J Shailer; B C Moore
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Growth-of-masking functions for several types of maskers.

Authors:  B R Glasberg; B C Moore
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Release from masking caused by envelope fluctuations.

Authors:  S Buus
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1985-12       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Furosemide alters organ of corti mechanics: evidence for feedback of outer hair cells upon the basilar membrane.

Authors:  M A Ruggero; N C Rich
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Masking of speech by amplitude-modulated noise.

Authors:  H A Gustafsson; S D Arlinger
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Nonlinear input-output functions derived from the responses of guinea-pig cochlear nerve fibres: variations with characteristic frequency.

Authors:  N P Cooper; G K Yates
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 3.208

View more
  9 in total

1.  Psychometric functions for sentence recognition in sinusoidally amplitude-modulated noises.

Authors:  Yi Shen; Nicole K Manzano; Virginia M Richards
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Recognition of synthesized vowel sequences in steady-state and sinusoidally amplitude-modulated noises.

Authors:  Yi Shen; Dylan V Pearson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Masking Release in Children and Adults With Hearing Loss When Using Amplification.

Authors:  Marc Brennan; Ryan McCreery; Judy Kopun; Dawna Lewis; Joshua Alexander; Patricia Stelmachowicz
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.297

Review 4.  Why do I hear but not understand? Stochastic undersampling as a model of degraded neural encoding of speech.

Authors:  Enrique A Lopez-Poveda
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2014-10-30       Impact factor: 4.677

5.  Speech perception in tones and noise via cochlear implants reveals influence of spectral resolution on temporal processing.

Authors:  Andrew J Oxenham; Heather A Kreft
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2014-10-13       Impact factor: 3.293

6.  Speech Masking in Normal and Impaired Hearing: Interactions Between Frequency Selectivity and Inherent Temporal Fluctuations in Noise.

Authors:  Andrew J Oxenham; Heather A Kreft
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 2.622

7.  Magnified Neural Envelope Coding Predicts Deficits in Speech Perception in Noise.

Authors:  Rebecca E Millman; Sven L Mattys; André D Gouws; Garreth Prendergast
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-07-10       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Predictors of Hearing-Aid Outcomes.

Authors:  Enrique A Lopez-Poveda; Peter T Johannesen; Patricia Pérez-González; José L Blanco; Sridhar Kalluri; Brent Edwards
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2017 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

9.  The Influence of Cochlear Mechanical Dysfunction, Temporal Processing Deficits, and Age on the Intelligibility of Audible Speech in Noise for Hearing-Impaired Listeners.

Authors:  Peter T Johannesen; Patricia Pérez-González; Sridhar Kalluri; José L Blanco; Enrique A Lopez-Poveda
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2016-09-07       Impact factor: 3.293

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.