Literature DB >> 22894234

Asynchronous glimpsing of speech: spread of masking and task set-size.

Erol J Ozmeral1, Emily Buss, Joseph W Hall.   

Abstract

Howard-Jones and Rosen [(1993). J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 93, 2915-2922] investigated the ability to integrate glimpses of speech that are separated in time and frequency using a "checkerboard" masker, with asynchronous amplitude modulation (AM) across frequency. Asynchronous glimpsing was demonstrated only for spectrally wide frequency bands. It is possible that the reduced evidence of spectro-temporal integration with narrower bands was due to spread of masking at the periphery. The present study tested this hypothesis with a dichotic condition, in which the even- and odd-numbered bands of the target speech and asynchronous AM masker were presented to opposite ears, minimizing the deleterious effects of masking spread. For closed-set consonant recognition, thresholds were 5.1-8.5 dB better for dichotic than for monotic asynchronous AM conditions. Results were similar for closed-set word recognition, but for open-set word recognition the benefit of dichotic presentation was more modest and level dependent, consistent with the effects of spread of masking being level dependent. There was greater evidence of asynchronous glimpsing in the open-set than closed-set tasks. Presenting stimuli dichotically supported asynchronous glimpsing with narrower frequency bands than previously shown, though the magnitude of glimpsing was reduced for narrower bandwidths even in some dichotic conditions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22894234      PMCID: PMC3427370          DOI: 10.1121/1.4730976

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  28 in total

1.  Comodulation masking release for speech stimuli.

Authors:  J H Grose; J W Hall
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Frequency distribution of central masking.

Authors:  J J Zwislocki; E Buining; J Glantz
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1968-06       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics.

Authors:  H Levitt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1971-02       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Uncomodulated glimpsing in "checkerboard" noise.

Authors:  P A Howard-Jones; S Rosen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Detection in noise by spectro-temporal pattern analysis.

Authors:  J W Hall; M P Haggard; M A Fernandes
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Release from masking caused by envelope fluctuations.

Authors:  S Buus
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1985-12       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Central masking effects on spondee threshold as a function of masker sensation level and masker sound pressure level.

Authors:  F N Martin; D Digiovanni
Journal:  J Am Audiol Soc       Date:  1979 Jan-Feb

8.  Split-band amplification: a HI/LO hearing aid fitting.

Authors:  B Franklin
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1981 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Frequency selectivity in normally-hearing and hearing-impaired observers.

Authors:  M Florentine; S Buus; B Scharf; E Zwicker
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1980-09

10.  Speech recognition in fluctuating and continuous maskers: effects of hearing loss and presentation level.

Authors:  Van Summers; Michelle R Molis
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 2.297

View more
  9 in total

1.  Glimpsing speech in temporally and spectro-temporally modulated noise.

Authors:  Daniel Fogerty; Brittney L Carter; Eric W Healy
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Exploring the Relationship Between Working Memory, Compressor Speed, and Background Noise Characteristics.

Authors:  Barbara Ohlenforst; Pamela E Souza; Ewen N MacDonald
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  Factors affecting the development of speech recognition in steady and modulated noise.

Authors:  Joseph W Hall; Emily Buss; John H Grose
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Using Auditory Characteristics to Select Hearing Aid Compression Speeds for Presbycusic Patients.

Authors:  Yi Zhang; Jing Chen; Yanmei Zhang; Baoxuan Sun; Yuhe Liu
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 5.702

5.  Spectro-temporal glimpsing of speech in noise: Regularity and coherence of masking patterns reduces uncertainty and increases intelligibility.

Authors:  Daniel Fogerty; Victoria A Sevich; Eric W Healy
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Aging and Spectro-Temporal Integration of Speech.

Authors:  John H Grose; Heather L Porter; Emily Buss
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2016-10-14       Impact factor: 3.293

7.  Auditory grouping is necessary to understand interrupted mosaic speech stimuli.

Authors:  Kazuo Ueda; Hiroshige Takeichi; Kohei Wakamiya
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2022-08       Impact factor: 2.482

8.  Magnetoencephalographic study on forward suppression by ipsilateral, contralateral, and binaural maskers.

Authors:  Tadashi Nishimura; Yuka Uratani; Tadao Okayasu; Seiji Nakagawa; Hiroshi Hosoi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-06       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  The Effects of Sensorineural Hearing Impairment on Asynchronous Glimpsing of Speech.

Authors:  Erol J Ozmeral; Emily Buss; Joseph W Hall
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-05-04       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.