Literature DB >> 31046298

The fluctuating masker benefit for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners with equal audibility at a fixed signal-to-noise ratio.

Kenneth Kragh Jensen1, Joshua G W Bernstein1.   

Abstract

Normal-hearing (NH) listeners can extract and integrate speech fragments from momentary dips in the level of a fluctuating masker, yielding a fluctuating-masker benefit (FMB) for speech understanding relative to a stationary-noise masker. Hearing-impaired (HI) listeners generally show less FMB, suggesting a dip-listening deficit attributable to suprathreshold spectral or temporal distortion. However, reduced FMB might instead result from different test signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs), reduced absolute audibility of otherwise unmasked speech segments, or age differences. This study examined the FMB for nine age-matched NH-HI listener pairs, while simultaneously equalizing audibility, SNR, and percentage-correct performance in stationary noise. Nonsense syllables were masked by stationary noise, 4- or 32-Hz sinusoidally amplitude-modulated noise (SAMN), or an opposite-gender interfering talker. Stationary-noise performance was equalized by adjusting the response-set size. Audibility was equalized by removing stimulus components falling below the HI absolute threshold. HI listeners showed a clear 4.5-dB reduction in FMB for 32-Hz SAMN, a similar FMB to NH listeners for 4-Hz SAMN, and a non-significant trend toward a 2-dB reduction in FMB for an interfering talker. These results suggest that HI listeners do not exhibit a general dip-listening deficit for all fluctuating maskers, but rather a specific temporal-resolution deficit affecting performance for high-rate modulated maskers.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31046298      PMCID: PMC6472958          DOI: 10.1121/1.5096641

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  53 in total

1.  On a psychophysical transformed-rule up and down method converging on a 75% level of correct responses.

Authors:  J J Zwislocki; E M Relkin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-04-03       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Informational and energetic masking effects in the perception of multiple simultaneous talkers.

Authors:  D S Brungart; B D Simpson; M A Ericson; K R Scott
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Speech dynamic range and its effect on cochlear implant performance.

Authors:  Fan-Gang Zeng; Ginger Grant; John Niparko; John Galvin; Robert Shannon; Jane Opie; Phil Segel
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Recovery from prior stimulation: masking of speech by interrupted noise for younger and older adults with normal hearing.

Authors:  Judy R Dubno; Amy R Horwitz; Jayne B Ahlstrom
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Effect of cochlear damage on the detection of complex temporal envelopes.

Authors:  Christian Füllgrabe; Bernard Meyer; Christian Lorenzi
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  A glimpsing model of speech perception in noise.

Authors:  Martin Cooke
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  A new procedure for measuring peripheral compression in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  D A Nelson; A C Schroder; M Wojtczak
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Speech perception in gated noise: the effects of temporal resolution.

Authors:  Su-Hyun Jin; Peggy B Nelson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  The relationship between the intelligibility of time-compressed speech and speech in noise in young and elderly listeners.

Authors:  Niek J Versfeld; Wouter A Dreschler
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Modulation detection in subjects with relatively flat hearing losses.

Authors:  S P Bacon; R M Gleitman
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1992-06
View more
  1 in total

1.  Effects of reverberation on speech intelligibility in noise for hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  Raphael Cueille; Mathieu Lavandier; Nicolas Grimault
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2022-08-31       Impact factor: 3.653

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.