Literature DB >> 17672654

Effects of cochlear implant processing and fundamental frequency on the intelligibility of competing sentences.

Ginger S Stickney1, Peter F Assmann, Janice Chang, Fan-Gang Zeng.   

Abstract

Speech perception in the presence of another competing voice is one of the most challenging tasks for cochlear implant users. Several studies have shown that (1) the fundamental frequency (F0) is a useful cue for segregating competing speech sounds and (2) the F0 is better represented by the temporal fine structure than by the temporal envelope. However, current cochlear implant speech processing algorithms emphasize temporal envelope information and discard the temporal fine structure. In this study, speech recognition was measured as a function of the F0 separation of the target and competing sentence in normal-hearing and cochlear implant listeners. For the normal-hearing listeners, the combined sentences were processed through either a standard implant simulation or a new algorithm which additionally extracts a slowed-down version of the temporal fine structure (called Frequency-Amplitude-Modulation-Encoding). The results showed no benefit of increasing F0 separation for the cochlear implant or simulation groups. In contrast, the new algorithm resulted in gradual improvements with increasing F0 separation, similar to that found with unprocessed sentences. These results emphasize the importance of temporal fine structure for speech perception and demonstrate a potential remedy for difficulty in the perceptual segregation of competing speech sounds.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17672654     DOI: 10.1121/1.2750159

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  38 in total

1.  Revisiting place and temporal theories of pitch.

Authors:  Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Acoust Sci Technol       Date:  2013

2.  Masking release and the contribution of obstruent consonants on speech recognition in noise by cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Ning Li; Philipos C Loizou
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Fundamental frequency discrimination and speech perception in noise in cochlear implant simulations.

Authors:  Jeff Carroll; Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2007-05-24       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Concurrent-vowel and tone recognitions in acoustic and simulated electric hearing.

Authors:  Xin Luo; Qian-Jie Fu
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Streaming of vowel sequences based on fundamental frequency in a cochlear-implant simulation.

Authors:  Etienne Gaudrain; Nicolas Grimault; Eric W Healy; Jean-Christophe Béra
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Spatial release from masking with noise-vocoded speech.

Authors:  Richard L Freyman; Uma Balakrishnan; Karen S Helfer
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Effect of a competing instrument on melodic contour identification by cochlear implant users.

Authors:  John J Galvin; Qian-Jie Fu; Sandra I Oba
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  The ability of cochlear implant users to use temporal envelope cues recovered from speech frequency modulation.

Authors:  Jong Ho Won; Christian Lorenzi; Kaibao Nie; Xing Li; Elyse M Jameyson; Ward R Drennan; Jay T Rubinstein
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Effects of electrode separation between speech and noise signals on consonant identification in cochlear implants.

Authors:  Bom Jun Kwon
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Masking release for low- and high-pass-filtered speech in the presence of noise and single-talker interference.

Authors:  Andrew J Oxenham; Andrea M Simonson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.