Literature DB >> 21755466

MR safety: simultaneous B0, dΦ/dt, and dB/dt measurements on MR-workers up to 7 T.

Jens Groebner1, Reiner Umathum, Michael Bock, Axel J Krafft, Wolfhard Semmler, Jaane Rauschenberg.   

Abstract

OBJECT: The EU directive on safety requirements (2004/40/EC) limits the exposure to time varying magnetic fields to dB /dt=200 mT/s. This action value is not clearly defined as it considers only the temporal change of the magnitude of B. Thus, only the translational motion in the magnet's fringe field is considered and rotations are neglected.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A magnetic field probe was constructed to simultaneously record the magnetic flux density B(x, y, z) with a 3-axis Hall sensor and the induced voltage due to movements with a set of three orthogonal coils. Voltages were converted into time-varying magnetic flux d Φ(x, y, z)/dt serving as an exposition parameter for both translations and rotations. To separate the two types of motion, d B/dt was additionally calculated on the basis of the Hall sensor's data. The calibrated probe was attached to the forehead of 8 healthcare workers and 17 MR physicists, and B and dΦ/dt were recorded during standard operating procedures at three different MR systems up to 7 T.
RESULTS: The maximum percentage of the translational motion referring the data including both translations and rotations amounts to 32%. During volunteer measurements, maximum exposure values of dΦ/dt=21 mWb/s, dB/dt=1.40 T/s and |B|=2.75 T were found.
CONCLUSION: The findings in this work indicate that both translations and rotations in the vicinity of an MR system should be taken into account, and that a single regulatory action level might not be sufficient.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21755466     DOI: 10.1007/s10334-011-0270-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  MAGMA        ISSN: 0968-5243            Impact factor:   2.310


  18 in total

1.  Cognitive, cardiac, and physiological safety studies in ultra high field magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  A Kangarlu; R E Burgess; H Zhu; T Nakayama; R L Hamlin; A M Abduljalil; P M Robitaille
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 2.546

Review 2.  Impact of electromagnetic field exposure limits in Europe: is the future of interventional MRI safe?

Authors:  Derek L G Hill; Kate McLeish; Stephen F Keevil
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.173

3.  Occupational exposure to static and time-varying gradient magnetic fields in MR units.

Authors:  Jill K Bradley; Matilda Nyekiova; David L Price; Lindsay D'jon Lopez; Therese Crawley
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 4.813

4.  Thresholds for perceiving metallic taste at high magnetic field.

Authors:  Ian D Cavin; Paul M Glover; Richard W Bowtell; Penny A Gowland
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 4.813

5.  EU Directive 2004/40: field measurements of a 1.5 T clinical MR scanner.

Authors:  S F Riches; D J Collins; J W Scuffham; M O Leach
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  Measurement of electric fields induced in a human subject due to natural movements in static magnetic fields or exposure to alternating magnetic field gradients.

Authors:  P M Glover; R Bowtell
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2007-12-28       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  Analysis and measurements of magnetic field exposures for healthcare workers in selected MR environments.

Authors:  Miguel A Fuentes; Adnan Trakic; Stephan J Wilson; Stuart Crozier
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 4.538

8.  A personal dosimeter prototype for static magnetic fields.

Authors:  F Cavagnetto; P Prati; V Ariola; P Corvisiero; M Marinelli; A Pilot; G Taccini
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 1.316

9.  IEEE Committee on Man and Radiation (COMAR) Technical Information Statement "exposure of medical personnel to electromagnetic fields from open magnetic resonance imaging systems".

Authors:  H Bassen; D J Schaefer; L Zaremba; J Bushberg; M Ziskin; K R Foster
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 1.316

10.  Amendment to the ICNIRP "Statement on medical magnetic resonance (MR) procedures: protection of patients".

Authors: 
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 1.316

View more
  6 in total

1.  A novel tool for estimation of magnetic resonance occupational exposure to spatially varying magnetic fields.

Authors:  Valentina Hartwig; Nicola Vanello; Giulio Giovannetti; Massimo Lombardi; Luigi Landini; Maria Filomena Santarelli
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2011-09-04       Impact factor: 2.310

Review 2.  The revised electromagnetic fields directive and worker exposure in environments with high magnetic flux densities.

Authors:  Rianne Stam
Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg       Date:  2014-02-20

Review 3.  Occupational exposure to electromagnetic fields in magnetic resonance environment: basic aspects and review of exposure assessment approaches.

Authors:  Valentina Hartwig; Stefania Romeo; Olga Zeni
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2018-01-18       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 4.  Gradient and shim technologies for ultra high field MRI.

Authors:  Simone A Winkler; Franz Schmitt; Hermann Landes; Joshua de Bever; Trevor Wade; Andrew Alejski; Brian K Rutt
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2016-11-30       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Exposure Assessment and Biomonitoring of Workers in Magnetic Resonance Environment: An Exploratory Study.

Authors:  Anna Sannino; Stefania Romeo; Maria Rosaria Scarfì; Rita Massa; Raffaele d'Angelo; Antonella Petrillo; Vincenzo Cerciello; Roberta Fusco; Olga Zeni
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2017-12-18

Review 6.  Occupational exposure to electromagnetic fields from medical sources.

Authors:  Rianne Stam; Sachiko Yamaguchi-Sekino
Journal:  Ind Health       Date:  2017-11-03       Impact factor: 2.179

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.