Literature DB >> 18390326

Analysis and measurements of magnetic field exposures for healthcare workers in selected MR environments.

Miguel A Fuentes1, Adnan Trakic, Stephan J Wilson, Stuart Crozier.   

Abstract

There are concerns about workers repeatedly exposed to magnetic fields exceeding regulatory limits with respect to modern magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). As a result, there is need for an ambulatory magnetic field dosimeter capable of measuring these fields in and around an MRI scanner in order to evaluate the regulatory guidelines and determine any underlying exposure risks. This study presents results of tri-axial measurements using an ambulatory magnetic field dosimeter worn by workers during normal working shifts. We recorded and analyzed magnetic field exposures in and around 1.5 T, 2 T, and 4 T magnets during routine patient procedures. The data was integrated and averaged over time and evaluated against the latest exposure standards. Time-varying magnetic fields occur when individuals move through spatially non-uniform static magnetic fields or during gradient-pulsed magnetic fields or a combination of both. Our previous numerical analysis shows that at certain positions surrounding the MRI scanner ends, such fields may induce current densities and electric fields that may exceed the relevant EU, ICNIRP, and IEEE standards. A high-speed acquisition version of the dosimeter measured gradient- pulsed fields at positions accessible by MRI workers near the scanner ends, and the results were evaluated and compared against the numerical simulations and the standards. Our measurements confirm that workers can be exposed to magnetic fields exceeding the guidelines at positions near the gradient coil ends during clinical imaging and a high degree of correlation exists with the numerical results. While the time-weighted average magnetic field exposures in 1.5 T, 2 T, and 4 T were all within the regulatory limits during static magnetic field measurements, the peak limits for the head can be exceeded in some circumstances. This study presents a small number of routine shifts of data that provide indicative results of magnetic field exposure in real situations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18390326     DOI: 10.1109/TBME.2007.913410

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng        ISSN: 0018-9294            Impact factor:   4.538


  19 in total

Review 1.  Occupational exposure in MRI.

Authors:  D W McRobbie
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  MR safety: simultaneous B0, dΦ/dt, and dB/dt measurements on MR-workers up to 7 T.

Authors:  Jens Groebner; Reiner Umathum; Michael Bock; Axel J Krafft; Wolfhard Semmler; Jaane Rauschenberg
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2011-07-14       Impact factor: 2.310

3.  Evaluation of occupational exposure in magnetic resonance sites.

Authors:  Giuseppe Acri; Barbara Testagrossa; Federica Causa; Maria Giulia Tripepi; Giuseppe Vermiglio; Raffaele Novario; Liviana Pozzi; Gloria Quadrelli
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2013-12-12       Impact factor: 3.469

Review 4.  Implementation of a comprehensive MR safety course for medical students.

Authors:  Steffen Sammet; Christina L Sammet
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 4.813

5.  A novel tool for estimation of magnetic resonance occupational exposure to spatially varying magnetic fields.

Authors:  Valentina Hartwig; Nicola Vanello; Giulio Giovannetti; Massimo Lombardi; Luigi Landini; Maria Filomena Santarelli
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2011-09-04       Impact factor: 2.310

6.  Transient health symptoms of MRI staff working with 1.5 and 3.0 Tesla scanners in the UK.

Authors:  Frank de Vocht; Evridiki Batistatou; Anna Mölter; Hans Kromhout; Kristel Schaap; Martie van Tongeren; Stuart Crozier; Penny Gowland; Stephen Keevil
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-03-13       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Evaluation of exposure to (ultra) high static magnetic fields during activities around human MRI scanners.

Authors:  Mahsa Fatahi; Jolanta Karpowicz; Krzysztof Gryz; Amirmohammad Fattahi; Georg Rose; Oliver Speck
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2016-12-16       Impact factor: 2.310

Review 8.  The revised electromagnetic fields directive and worker exposure in environments with high magnetic flux densities.

Authors:  Rianne Stam
Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg       Date:  2014-02-20

Review 9.  Occupational exposure to electromagnetic fields in magnetic resonance environment: basic aspects and review of exposure assessment approaches.

Authors:  Valentina Hartwig; Stefania Romeo; Olga Zeni
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2018-01-18       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 10.  Magnetic resonance safety.

Authors:  Steffen Sammet
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2016-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.