Literature DB >> 24557933

The revised electromagnetic fields directive and worker exposure in environments with high magnetic flux densities.

Rianne Stam1.   

Abstract

Some of the strongest electromagnetic fields (EMF) are found in the workplace. A European Directive sets limits to workers' exposure to EMF. This review summarizes its origin and contents and compares magnetic field exposure levels in high-risk workplaces with the limits set in the revised Directive. Pubmed, Scopus, grey literature databases, and websites of organizations involved in occupational exposure measurements were searched. The focus was on EMF with frequencies up to 10 MHz, which can cause stimulation of the nervous system. Selected studies had to provide individual maximum exposure levels at the workplace, either in terms of the external magnetic field strength or flux density or as induced electric field strength or current density. Indicative action levels and the corresponding exposure limit values for magnetic fields in the revised European Directive will be higher than those in the previous version. Nevertheless, magnetic flux densities in excess of the action levels for peripheral nerve stimulation are reported for workers involved in welding, induction heating, transcranial magnetic stimulation, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The corresponding health effects exposure limit values for the electric fields in the worker's body can be exceeded for welding and MRI, but calculations for induction heating and transcranial magnetic stimulation are lacking. Since the revised European Directive conditionally exempts MRI-related activities from the exposure limits, measures to reduce exposure may be necessary for welding, induction heating, and transcranial nerve stimulation. Since such measures can be complicated, there is a clear need for exposure databases for different workplace scenarios with significant EMF exposure and guidance on good practices.
© The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Occupational Hygiene Society.

Keywords:  electromagnetic fields; legislation; occupational exposure; peripheral nervous system

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24557933      PMCID: PMC4305112          DOI: 10.1093/annhyg/meu010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg        ISSN: 0003-4878


  53 in total

1.  Chromosomal aberrations in lymphocytes of employees in transformer and generator production exposed to electromagnetic fields and mineral oil.

Authors:  K Skyberg; I L Hansteen; A I Vistnes
Journal:  Bioelectromagnetics       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 2.010

2.  Occupational exposure to static, ELF, VF and VLF magnetic fields and immune parameters.

Authors:  H Tuschl; G Neubauer; G Schmid; E Weber; N Winker
Journal:  Int J Occup Med Environ Health       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.843

3.  Occupational exposures of pharmacists and pharmaceutical assistants to 60 Hz magnetic fields.

Authors:  C Y Li; R S Lin; C H Wu; F C Sung
Journal:  Ind Health       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 2.179

4.  Effects of extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields on hematologic and immunologic parameters in welders.

Authors:  Suleyman Dasdag; Cemil Sert; Zulkuf Akdag; Sabri Batun
Journal:  Arch Med Res       Date:  2002 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.235

5.  Magnetic field exposures for UK live-line workers.

Authors:  Trevor W Dawson; Krys Caputa; Maria A Stuchly
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2002-04-07       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 6.  Radiofrequency energy-induced heating during MR procedures: a review.

Authors:  F G Shellock
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 4.813

7.  Assessment of exposure to magnetic fields in occupational settings.

Authors:  Hirofumi Sakurazawa; Akio Iwasaki; Toshiaki Higashi; Takeo Nakayama; Yukinori Kusaka
Journal:  J Occup Health       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 2.708

8.  Occupational exposures to high frequency electromagnetic fields in the intermediate range ( >300 Hz-10 MHz).

Authors:  Birgitta Floderus; Carin Stenlund; Frank Carlgren
Journal:  Bioelectromagnetics       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.010

9.  Magnetic field from spot welding equipment--is the basic restriction exceeded?

Authors:  Mohammad Nadeem; Yngve Hamnerius; Kjell Hansson Mild; Mikael Persson
Journal:  Bioelectromagnetics       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 2.010

10.  Guidance on determining compliance of exposure to pulsed and complex non-sinusoidal waveforms below 100 kHz with ICNIRP guidelines.

Authors: 
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 1.316

View more
  5 in total

1.  [New aspects from legislation, guidelines and safety standards for MRI].

Authors:  M Mühlenweg; G Schaefers; S Trattnig
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 0.635

2.  Occupational exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields.

Authors:  Rianne Stam
Journal:  Ind Health       Date:  2021-11-17       Impact factor: 2.707

3.  Occupational electromagnetic spectrum hazards and the significance of artificial optical radiation: country report for Greece.

Authors:  George A Gourzoulidis; Efthymios Karabetsos; Constantinos Bourousis; Charilaos Tyrakis; Andreas D Flouris; Thomas G Maris; Frangiskos V Topalis
Journal:  Med Lav       Date:  2022-04-26       Impact factor: 1.275

Review 4.  A Source-based Measurement Database for Occupational Exposure Assessment of Electromagnetic Fields in the INTEROCC Study: A Literature Review Approach.

Authors:  Javier Vila; Joseph D Bowman; Lesley Richardson; Laurel Kincl; Dave L Conover; Dave McLean; Simon Mann; Paolo Vecchia; Martie van Tongeren; Elisabeth Cardis
Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg       Date:  2015-10-21

Review 5.  Occupational exposure to electromagnetic fields from medical sources.

Authors:  Rianne Stam; Sachiko Yamaguchi-Sekino
Journal:  Ind Health       Date:  2017-11-03       Impact factor: 2.179

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.