Literature DB >> 17969179

Thresholds for perceiving metallic taste at high magnetic field.

Ian D Cavin1, Paul M Glover, Richard W Bowtell, Penny A Gowland.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To perform an initial characterization of the metallic taste effect observed by some workers when moving around an MRI scanner.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 21 subjects performed controlled movements in the stray field of a 7-T scanner. Rates of change of magnetic flux were recorded during the study using a custom-built three-axis coil unit connected to a data logger.
RESULTS: Relatively normal movements could generate switched fields of 2 T/second. Of the 21 subjects, 12 detected a metallic taste, but the threshold at which it was perceived varied greatly between subjects, with the minimum dB/dt value at which such a taste was detected being 1.3 T/second. The threshold also depended on the direction of movement.
CONCLUSION: This study indicates that 50% of subjects will perceive a metallic taste for head shaking with a period of 1.5 seconds (magnetic field in an anterior/posterior direction) causing a dB/dt of 2.3 +/- 0.3 T/second. The presence of dental fillings is not a requirement for the sensation of metallic taste.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17969179     DOI: 10.1002/jmri.21153

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 1053-1807            Impact factor:   4.813


  14 in total

Review 1.  Occupational exposure in MRI.

Authors:  D W McRobbie
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 2.  The future of ultra-high field MRI and fMRI for study of the human brain.

Authors:  Jeff H Duyn
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2011-10-28       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  MR safety: simultaneous B0, dΦ/dt, and dB/dt measurements on MR-workers up to 7 T.

Authors:  Jens Groebner; Reiner Umathum; Michael Bock; Axel J Krafft; Wolfhard Semmler; Jaane Rauschenberg
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2011-07-14       Impact factor: 2.310

Review 4.  Implementation of a comprehensive MR safety course for medical students.

Authors:  Steffen Sammet; Christina L Sammet
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 4.813

5.  Health effects and safety of magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Frank de Vocht; Jonna Wilén; Kjell Hansson Mild; Lotte E van Nierop; Pauline Slottje; Hans Kromhout
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2011-01-26       Impact factor: 4.460

6.  Induced magnetic force in human heads exposed to 4 T MRI.

Authors:  Ruiliang Wang; Gene-Jack Wang; Rita Z Goldstein; Elisabeth C Caparelli; Nora D Volkow; Joanna S Fowler; Dardo Tomasi
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 7.  Gradient and shim technologies for ultra high field MRI.

Authors:  Simone A Winkler; Franz Schmitt; Hermann Landes; Joshua de Bever; Trevor Wade; Andrew Alejski; Brian K Rutt
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2016-11-30       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 8.  Magnetic resonance safety.

Authors:  Steffen Sammet
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2016-03

9.  On the vertigo due to static magnetic fields.

Authors:  Omar S Mian; Yan Li; Andre Antunes; Paul M Glover; Brian L Day
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-30       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Occupational exposure of healthcare and research staff to static magnetic stray fields from 1.5-7 Tesla MRI scanners is associated with reporting of transient symptoms.

Authors:  Kristel Schaap; Yvette Christopher-de Vries; Catherine K Mason; Frank de Vocht; Lützen Portengen; Hans Kromhout
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2014-04-08       Impact factor: 4.402

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.