Literature DB >> 9224839

Planning an action.

M Gentilucci1, A Negrotti, M Gangitano.   

Abstract

The motor control of a sequence of two motor acts forming an action was studied in the present experiment. The two analysed motor acts were reaching-grasping an object (first target) and placing it on a second target of the same shape and size (experiment 1). The aim was to determine whether extrinsic properties of the second target (i.e. target distance) could selectively influence the kinematics of reaching and grasping. Distance, position and size of both targets were randomly varied across the experimental session. The kinematics of the initial phase of the first motor act, that is, velocity of reaching and hand shaping of grasping, were influenced by distance of the second target. No kinematic difference was found between movements executed with and without visual control of both hand and targets. These results could be due to computation of the general program of an action that takes into account extrinsic properties of the final target. Conversely, they could depend on a visual interference effect produced by the near second target on the control of the first motor act. In order to dissociate the effects due to second target distance from those due to visual interference, two control experiments were carried out. In the first control experiment (experiment 2) subjects executed movements directed towards spatial locations at different distances from the first target, as in experiment 1. However, the near second target was not presented and subjects were required to place the object on an arbitrary near position. Distance of the second (either real or arbitrary) target affected the reaching component of the first motor act, as in experiment 1, but not the grasp component. In the second control experiment (experiment 3), the pure visual interference effect was tested. Subjects were required to reach and grasp the object and to lift it in either presence or absence of a second near stimulus. No effect on the initial phase of the first motor act was observed. The results of the this study suggest a dissociation in the control of reaching and grasping, concerning not only visual analysis of extrinsic properties of the immediate target but also visual analysis of the final target of the action. In other words, the notion of modularity for the motor control can be extended to the construction of an entire action.

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9224839     DOI: 10.1007/pl00005671

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  21 in total

1.  Planning short pointing sequences.

Authors:  Philippe Vindras; Paolo Viviani
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-07-17       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  The bottle and the glass say to me: "pour!".

Authors:  Elisa De Stefani; Alessandro Innocenti; Nicolò Francesco Bernardi; Giovanna Cristina Campione; Maurizio Gentilucci
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-03-13       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Oral hapsis guides accurate hand preshaping for grasping food targets in the mouth.

Authors:  Jenni M Karl; Lori-Ann R Sacrey; Jon B Doan; Ian Q Whishaw
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-07-11       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  An object for an action, the same object for other actions: effects on hand shaping.

Authors:  Caterina Ansuini; Livia Giosa; Luca Turella; Gianmarco Altoè; Umberto Castiello
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-10-02       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 5.  Evidence for a distributed hierarchy of action representation in the brain.

Authors:  Scott T Grafton; Antonia F de C Hamilton
Journal:  Hum Mov Sci       Date:  2007-08-13       Impact factor: 2.161

6.  Tailoring reach-to-grasp to intended action: the role of motor practice.

Authors:  Kate Wilmut; Anna L Barnett
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Habitual and goal-directed factors in (everyday) object handling.

Authors:  Oliver Herbort; Martin V Butz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-07-12       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  To me or to you? When the self is advantaged.

Authors:  Francesca Ferri; Giovanna Cristina Campione; Riccardo Dalla Volta; Claudia Gianelli; Maurizio Gentilucci
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-05-06       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Breaking the flow of an action.

Authors:  Caterina Ansuini; Katya Grigis; Stefano Massaccesi; Umberto Castiello
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-11-08       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Higher blood pressure predicts lower regional grey matter volume: Consequences on short-term information processing.

Authors:  Peter J Gianaros; Phil J Greer; Christopher M Ryan; J Richard Jennings
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2006-02-20       Impact factor: 6.556

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.