Literature DB >> 22075763

Representation of grasp postures and anticipatory motor planning in children.

Tino Stöckel1, Charmayne M L Hughes, Thomas Schack.   

Abstract

In this study, we investigated anticipatory motor planning and the development of cognitive representation of grasp postures in children aged 7, 8, and 9 years. Overall, 9-year-old children were more likely to plan their movements to end in comfortable postures, and have distinct representational structures of certain grasp postures, compared to the 7- and 8-year old children. Additionally, the sensitivity toward comfortable end-states (end-state comfort) was related to the mental representation of certain grasp postures. Children with grasp comfort related and functionally well-structured representations were more likely to have satisfied end-state comfort in both the simple and the advanced planning condition. In contrast, end-state comfort satisfaction for the advanced planning condition was much lower for children whose cognitive representations were not structured by grasp comfort. The results of the present study support the notion that cognitive action representation plays an important role in the planning and control of grasp postures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22075763     DOI: 10.1007/s00426-011-0387-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Res        ISSN: 0340-0727


  22 in total

1.  Does visual perception of object afford action? Evidence from a neuroimaging study.

Authors:  J Grèzes; J Decety
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 3.139

2.  The functional architecture of the human body: assessing body representation by sorting body parts and activities.

Authors:  Bettina Bläsing; Thomas Schack; Peter Brugger
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-03-24       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  End-state comfort in bimanual object manipulation.

Authors:  Matthias Weigelt; Wilfried Kunde; Wolfgang Prinz
Journal:  Exp Psychol       Date:  2006

4.  Developing motor planning over ages.

Authors:  Jean-Pierre Thibaut; Lucette Toussaint
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  2009-11-17

5.  On the relations between seen objects and components of potential actions.

Authors:  M Tucker; R Ellis
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Development of prehension movements in children: a kinematic study.

Authors:  J P Kuhtz-Buschbeck; H Stolze; K Jöhnk; A Boczek-Funcke; M Illert
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Physically coupling two objects in a bimanual task alters kinematics but not end-state comfort.

Authors:  Charmayne M L Hughes; Jeffrey M Haddad; Elizabeth A Franz; Howard N Zelaznik; Joong Hyun Ryu
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-04-12       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  The end-state comfort effect in young children.

Authors:  Carola F Adalbjornsson; Mark G Fischman; Mary E Rudisill
Journal:  Res Q Exerc Sport       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 2.500

9.  The cognitive nature of action - functional links between cognitive psychology, movement science, and robotics.

Authors:  Thomas Schack; Helge Ritter
Journal:  Prog Brain Res       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.453

10.  Preparation for grasping an object: a developmental study.

Authors:  C von Hofsten; L Rönnqvist
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 3.332

View more
  31 in total

1.  Hemispheric lateralization does not affect the cognitive and mechanical cost of a sequential motor task.

Authors:  Christoph Schütz; Thomas Schack
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2019-09-27       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  The relation between measures of cognitive and motor functioning in 5- to 6-year-old children.

Authors:  Tino Stöckel; Charmayne M L Hughes
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2015-03-28

3.  Cognitive costs of motor planning do not differ between pointing and grasping in a sequential task.

Authors:  Christoph Schütz; Matthias Weigelt; Thomas Schack
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-03-10       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Computational assessment of long-term memory structures from SDA-M related to action sequences.

Authors:  Benjamin Strenge; Ludwig Vogel; Thomas Schack
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-02-22       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  The influence of reducing intermediate target constraints on grasp posture planning during a three-segment object manipulation task.

Authors:  Christian Seegelke; Charmayne M L Hughes; Andreas Knoblauch; Thomas Schack
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-11-05       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  The development of tool use: Planning for end-state comfort.

Authors:  David M Comalli; Rachel Keen; Evelyn S Abraham; Victoria J Foo; Mei-Hua Lee; Karen E Adolph
Journal:  Dev Psychol       Date:  2016-11

7.  Planning grasps for object manipulation: integrating internal preferences and external constraints.

Authors:  Oliver Herbort; Martin V Butz
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2015-09

8.  Functional relationship between cognitive representations of movement directions and visuomotor adaptation performance.

Authors:  Heiko Lex; Matthias Weigelt; Andreas Knoblauch; Thomas Schack
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-09-25       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Second-order motor planning in children: insights from a cup-manipulation-task.

Authors:  Kathrin Wunsch; Daniel J Weiss; Thomas Schack; Matthias Weigelt
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2014-07-17

10.  Influence of mechanical load on sequential effects.

Authors:  Christoph Schütz; Thomas Schack
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-06-01       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.