Literature DB >> 19146331

Influence of adaptive-optics ocular aberration correction on visual acuity at different luminances and contrast polarities.

Susana Marcos1, Lucie Sawides, Enrique Gambra, Carlos Dorronsoro.   

Abstract

We evaluated the visual benefit of correcting astigmatism and high-order aberrations with adaptive optics (AO) on visual acuity (VA) measured at 7 different luminances (ranging from 0.8 to 50 cd/m(2)) and two contrast polarities (black letters on white background, BoW, and white letters on black background, WoB) on 7 subjects. For the BoW condition, VA increased with background luminance in both natural and AO-corrected conditions, and there was a benefit of AO correction at all luminances (by a factor of 1.29 on average across luminances). For WoB VA increased with foreground luminance but decreased for the highest luminances. In this reversed polarity condition AO correction increased VA by a factor of 1.13 on average and did not produce a visual benefit at high luminances. The improvement of VA (averaged across conditions) was significantly correlated (p = 0.04) with the amount of corrected aberrations (in terms of Strehl ratio). The improved performance with WoB targets with respect to BoW targets is decreased when correcting aberrations, suggesting a role of ocular aberrations in the differences in visual performance between contrast polarities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19146331     DOI: 10.1167/8.13.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  25 in total

1.  Adaptation to astigmatic blur.

Authors:  Lucie Sawides; Susana Marcos; Sowmya Ravikumar; Larry Thibos; Arthur Bradley; Michael Webster
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-10-18       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Perceived image quality with simulated segmented bifocal corrections.

Authors:  Carlos Dorronsoro; Aiswaryah Radhakrishnan; Pablo de Gracia; Lucie Sawides; Susana Marcos
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2016-10-03       Impact factor: 3.732

3.  Effects of optical blur reduction on equivalent intrinsic blur.

Authors:  Ali Kord Valeshabad; Justin Wanek; J Jason McAnany; Mahnaz Shahidi
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 1.973

4.  Adaptive optics without altering visual perception.

Authors:  D E Koenig; N W Hart; H J Hofer
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2014-03-07       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Optics and neural adaptation jointly limit human stereovision.

Authors:  Cherlyn J Ng; Randolph Blake; Martin S Banks; Duje Tadin; Geunyoung Yoon
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Pre-operative simulation of post-operative multifocal vision.

Authors:  Maria Vinas; Sara Aissati; Mercedes Romero; Clara Benedi-Garcia; Nuria Garzon; Francisco Poyales; Carlos Dorronsoro; Susana Marcos
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2019-10-21       Impact factor: 3.732

Review 7.  Adaptive optics for studying visual function: a comprehensive review.

Authors:  Austin Roorda
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-06-16       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  Adapting to blur produced by ocular high-order aberrations.

Authors:  Lucie Sawides; Pablo de Gracia; Carlos Dorronsoro; Michael Webster; Susana Marcos
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-06-28       Impact factor: 2.240

9.  Contributions of optical and non-optical blur to variation in visual acuity.

Authors:  J Jason McAnany; Mahnaz Shahidi; Raymond A Applegate; Ruth Zelkha; Kenneth R Alexander
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 1.973

10.  Dynamic accommodation with simulated targets blurred with high order aberrations.

Authors:  Enrique Gambra; Yinan Wang; Jing Yuan; Philip B Kruger; Susana Marcos
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2010-07-03       Impact factor: 1.886

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.