Literature DB >> 26114678

Single neural code for blur in subjects with different interocular optical blur orientation.

Aiswaryah Radhakrishnan, Lucie Sawides, Carlos Dorronsoro, Eli Peli, Susana Marcos.   

Abstract

The ability of the visual system to compensate for differences in blur orientation between eyes is not well understood. We measured the orientation of the internal blur code in both eyes of the same subject monocularly by presenting pairs of images blurred with real ocular point spread functions (PSFs) of similar blur magnitude but varying in orientations. Subjects assigned a level of confidence to their selection of the best perceived image in each pair. Using a classification-images-inspired paradigm and applying a reverse correlation technique, a classification map was obtained from the weighted averages of the PSFs, representing the internal blur code. Positive and negative neural PSFs were obtained from the classification map, representing the neural blur for best and worse perceived blur, respectively. The neural PSF was found to be highly correlated in both eyes, even for eyes with different ocular PSF orientations (rPos = 0.95; rNeg = 0.99; p < 0.001). We found that in subjects with similar and with different ocular PSF orientations between eyes, the orientation of the positive neural PSF was closer to the orientation of the ocular PSF of the eye with the better optical quality (average difference was ∼10°), while the orientation of the positive and negative neural PSFs tended to be orthogonal. These results suggest a single internal code for blur with orientation driven by the orientation of the optical blur of the eye with better optical quality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26114678      PMCID: PMC4484355          DOI: 10.1167/15.8.15

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  51 in total

1.  Neural adjustments to image blur.

Authors:  Michael A Webster; Mark A Georgeson; Shernaaz M Webster
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Focus information is used to interpret binocular images.

Authors:  David M Hoffman; Martin S Banks
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-05-01       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Neural adjustments to chromatic blur.

Authors:  Michael A Webster; Yoko Mizokami; Leedjia A Svec; Sarah L Elliott
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  2006

4.  Interocular differences in higher-order aberrations on binocular visual performance.

Authors:  José R Jiménez; José J Castro; Raimundo Jiménez; Enrique Hita
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 1.973

Review 5.  Visual regulation of refractive development: insights from animal studies.

Authors:  E L Smith; L-F Hung; B Arumugam
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2013-12-13       Impact factor: 3.775

6.  Results of ocular dominance testing depend on assessment method.

Authors:  Melissa L Rice; David A Leske; Christina E Smestad; Jonathan M Holmes
Journal:  J AAPOS       Date:  2008-05-02       Impact factor: 1.220

7.  Emmetropization: a vision-dependent phenomenon.

Authors:  J Rabin; R C Van Sluyters; R Malach
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1981-04       Impact factor: 4.799

8.  Adapting to blur produced by ocular high-order aberrations.

Authors:  Lucie Sawides; Pablo de Gracia; Carlos Dorronsoro; Michael Webster; Susana Marcos
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-06-28       Impact factor: 2.240

9.  A cyclopean neural mechanism compensating for optical differences between the eyes.

Authors:  Aiswaryah Radhakrishnan; Carlos Dorronsoro; Lucie Sawides; Michael A Webster; Susana Marcos
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2015-03-02       Impact factor: 10.834

10.  Dependence of subjective image focus on the magnitude and pattern of high order aberrations.

Authors:  Lucie Sawides; Carlos Dorronsoro; Pablo de Gracia; Maria Vinas; Michael Webster; Susana Marcos
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2012-08-07       Impact factor: 2.240

View more
  2 in total

1.  Creating correct blur and its effect on accommodation.

Authors:  Steven A Cholewiak; Gordon D Love; Martin S Banks
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2018-09-04       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 2.  Vision science and adaptive optics, the state of the field.

Authors:  Susana Marcos; John S Werner; Stephen A Burns; William H Merigan; Pablo Artal; David A Atchison; Karen M Hampson; Richard Legras; Linda Lundstrom; Geungyoung Yoon; Joseph Carroll; Stacey S Choi; Nathan Doble; Adam M Dubis; Alfredo Dubra; Ann Elsner; Ravi Jonnal; Donald T Miller; Michel Paques; Hannah E Smithson; Laura K Young; Yuhua Zhang; Melanie Campbell; Jennifer Hunter; Andrew Metha; Grazyna Palczewska; Jesse Schallek; Lawrence C Sincich
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2017-02-27       Impact factor: 1.886

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.