Literature DB >> 23729770

Adaptation to interocular differences in blur.

Elysse Kompaniez1, Lucie Sawides, Susana Marcos, Michael A Webster.   

Abstract

Adaptation to a blurred image causes a physically focused image to appear too sharp, and shifts the point of subjective focus toward the adapting blur, consistent with a renormalization of perceived focus. We examined whether and how this adaptation normalizes to differences in blur between the two eyes, which can routinely arise from differences in refractive errors. Observers adapted to images filtered to simulate optical defocus or different axes of astigmatism, as well as to images that were isotropically blurred or sharpened by varying the slope of the amplitude spectrum. Adaptation to the different types of blur produced strong aftereffects that showed strong transfer across the eyes, as assessed both in a monocular adaptation task and in a contingent adaptation task in which the two eyes were simultaneously exposed to different blur levels. Selectivity for the adapting eye was thus generally weak. When one eye was exposed to a sharper image than the other, the aftereffects also tended to be dominated by the sharper image. Our results suggest that while short-term adaptation can rapidly recalibrate the perception of blur, it cannot do so independently for the two eyes, and that the binocular adaptation of blur is biased by the sharper of the two eyes' retinal images.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adaptation; blur; interocular transfer

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23729770      PMCID: PMC4521642          DOI: 10.1167/13.6.19

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  57 in total

1.  Accommodative error, adaptation and myopia.

Authors:  M Rosenfield; B Gilmartin
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  On the symmetry between eyes of wavefront aberration and cone directionality.

Authors:  S Marcos; S A Burns
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Blur adaptation and myopia.

Authors:  Sini George; Mark Rosenfield
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 1.973

4.  Spatial ensemble statistics are efficient codes that can be represented with reduced attention.

Authors:  George A Alvarez; Aude Oliva
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-04-20       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Interocular transfer of spatial adaptation is weak at low spatial frequencies.

Authors:  Daniel H Baker; Tim S Meese
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2012-05-12       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Improving vision: neural compensation for optical defocus.

Authors:  M Mon-Williams; J R Tresilian; N C Strang; P Kochhar; J P Wann
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1998-01-07       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 7.  Success of monovision in presbyopes: review of the literature and potential applications to refractive surgery.

Authors:  S Jain; I Arora; D T Azar
Journal:  Surv Ophthalmol       Date:  1996 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.048

8.  The tilt after-effect: a fresh look.

Authors:  F W Campbell; L Maffei
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1971-08       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Identifying amblyopia using associated conditions, acuity, and nonacuity features.

Authors:  M C Flom; H E Bedell
Journal:  Am J Optom Physiol Opt       Date:  1985-03

10.  Dependence of subjective image focus on the magnitude and pattern of high order aberrations.

Authors:  Lucie Sawides; Carlos Dorronsoro; Pablo de Gracia; Maria Vinas; Michael Webster; Susana Marcos
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2012-08-07       Impact factor: 2.240

View more
  9 in total

1.  Optics and neural adaptation jointly limit human stereovision.

Authors:  Cherlyn J Ng; Randolph Blake; Martin S Banks; Duje Tadin; Geunyoung Yoon
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Blur Adaptation to Central Retinal Disease.

Authors:  Fuensanta A Vera-Diaz; Russell L Woods; Eli Peli
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 4.799

Review 3.  Information theory of adaptation in neurons, behavior, and mood.

Authors:  Tatyana O Sharpee; Adam J Calhoun; Sreekanth H Chalasani
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2013-12-14       Impact factor: 6.627

4.  Single neural code for blur in subjects with different interocular optical blur orientation.

Authors:  Aiswaryah Radhakrishnan; Lucie Sawides; Carlos Dorronsoro; Eli Peli; Susana Marcos
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Perceptual adaptation to the correction of natural astigmatism.

Authors:  Maria Vinas; Lucie Sawides; Pablo de Gracia; Susana Marcos
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-26       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Blur perception throughout the visual field in myopia and emmetropia.

Authors:  Guido Maiello; Lenna Walker; Peter J Bex; Fuensanta A Vera-Diaz
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2017-05-01       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Vision with different presbyopia corrections simulated with a portable binocular visual simulator.

Authors:  Aiswaryah Radhakrishnan; Daniel Pascual; Susana Marcos; Carlos Dorronsoro
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-08-20       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Influence of Artificially Generated Interocular Blur Difference on Fusion Stability Under Vergence Stress.

Authors:  Miroslav Dostalek; Karel Fliegel; Ladislav Dusek; Tomas Lukes; Jan Hejda; Michaela Duchackova; Jiri Hozman; Rudolf Autrata
Journal:  J Eye Mov Res       Date:  2019-09-11       Impact factor: 0.957

9.  Using pattern classification to measure adaptation to the orientation of high order aberrations.

Authors:  Lucie Sawides; Carlos Dorronsoro; Andrew M Haun; Eli Peli; Susana Marcos
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.