BACKGROUND: Transfer RNAs are synthesized as a primary transcript that is processed to produce a mature tRNA. As part of the maturation process, a subset of the nucleosides are modified. Modifications in the anticodon region often modulate the decoding ability of the tRNA. At position 34, the majority of yeast cytosolic tRNA species that have a uridine are modified to 5-carbamoylmethyluridine (ncm(5)U), 5-carbamoylmethyl-2'-O-methyluridine (ncm(5)Um), 5-methoxycarbonylmethyl-uridine (mcm(5)U) or 5-methoxycarbonylmethyl-2-thiouridine (mcm(5)s(2)U). The formation of mcm(5) and ncm(5) side chains involves a complex pathway, where the last step in formation of mcm(5) is a methyl esterification of cm(5) dependent on the Trm9 and Trm112 proteins. METHODOLOGY AND PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Both Trm9 and Trm112 are required for the last step in formation of mcm(5) side chains at wobble uridines. By co-expressing a histidine-tagged Trm9p together with a native Trm112p in E. coli, these two proteins purified as a complex. The presence of Trm112p dramatically improves the methyltransferase activity of Trm9p in vitro. Single tRNA species that normally contain mcm(5)U or mcm(5)s(2)U nucleosides were isolated from trm9Δ or trm112Δ mutants and the presence of modified nucleosides was analyzed by HPLC. In both mutants, mcm(5)U and mcm(5)s(2)U nucleosides are absent in tRNAs and the major intermediates accumulating were ncm(5)U and ncm(5)s(2)U, not the expected cm(5)U and cm(5)s(2)U. CONCLUSIONS: Trm9p and Trm112p function together at the final step in formation of mcm(5)U in tRNA by using the intermediate cm(5)U as a substrate. In tRNA isolated from trm9Δ and trm112Δ strains, ncm(5)U and ncm(5)s(2)U nucleosides accumulate, questioning the order of nucleoside intermediate formation of the mcm(5) side chain. We propose two alternative explanations for this observation. One is that the intermediate cm(5)U is generated from ncm(5)U by a yet unknown mechanism and the other is that cm(5)U is formed before ncm(5)U and mcm(5)U.
BACKGROUND: Transfer RNAs are synthesized as a primary transcript that is processed to produce a mature tRNA. As part of the maturation process, a subset of the nucleosides are modified. Modifications in the anticodon region often modulate the decoding ability of the tRNA. At position 34, the majority of yeast cytosolic tRNA species that have a uridine are modified to 5-carbamoylmethyluridine (ncm(5)U), 5-carbamoylmethyl-2'-O-methyluridine (ncm(5)Um), 5-methoxycarbonylmethyl-uridine (mcm(5)U) or 5-methoxycarbonylmethyl-2-thiouridine (mcm(5)s(2)U). The formation of mcm(5) and ncm(5) side chains involves a complex pathway, where the last step in formation of mcm(5) is a methyl esterification of cm(5) dependent on the Trm9 and Trm112 proteins. METHODOLOGY AND PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Both Trm9 and Trm112 are required for the last step in formation of mcm(5) side chains at wobble uridines. By co-expressing a histidine-tagged Trm9p together with a native Trm112p in E. coli, these two proteins purified as a complex. The presence of Trm112p dramatically improves the methyltransferase activity of Trm9p in vitro. Single tRNA species that normally contain mcm(5)U or mcm(5)s(2)U nucleosides were isolated from trm9Δ or trm112Δ mutants and the presence of modified nucleosides was analyzed by HPLC. In both mutants, mcm(5)U and mcm(5)s(2)U nucleosides are absent in tRNAs and the major intermediates accumulating were ncm(5)U and ncm(5)s(2)U, not the expected cm(5)U and cm(5)s(2)U. CONCLUSIONS:Trm9p and Trm112p function together at the final step in formation of mcm(5)U in tRNA by using the intermediate cm(5)U as a substrate. In tRNA isolated from trm9Δ and trm112Δ strains, ncm(5)U and ncm(5)s(2)U nucleosides accumulate, questioning the order of nucleoside intermediate formation of the mcm(5) side chain. We propose two alternative explanations for this observation. One is that the intermediate cm(5)U is generated from ncm(5)U by a yet unknown mechanism and the other is that cm(5)U is formed before ncm(5)U and mcm(5)U.
Transfer RNAs are adapter molecules, which decode mRNA into protein and thereby play
a central role in gene expression. The primary tRNA transcript is processed by
different endo and exonucleases, and tRNA modifying enzymes to produce a mature tRNA
[1], [2], [3]. In this
maturation process, a subset of the four normal nucleosides adenosine (A), guanosine
(G), cytidine (C) and uridine (U) are modified [2], [3]. The modifications are introduced
post-transcriptionally, and the formation of a modified nucleoside may require one
or several enzymatic steps [2], [3]. Of the 50 modified nucleosides so far identified in
eukaryotic tRNAs, 25 are present in cytoplasmic tRNAs from S.
cerevisiae
[2], [4], [5]. In the
anticodon region, especially in positions 34 (wobble position) and 37, nucleosides
are frequently modified. Modified nucleosides in these positions are important for
reading frame maintenance and efficient decoding during translation [2], [3]. In yeast, there
are in total 42 cytosolic tRNA species, of which 11 have a uridine at position 34
modified to 5-carbamoylmethyluridine (ncm5U),
5-carbamoylmethyl-2′-O-methyluridine (ncm5Um),
5-methoxycarbonylmethyl-uridine (mcm5U) or
5-methoxycarbonylmethyl-2-thiouridine (mcm5s2U) [6]. The
formation of these nucleosides requires addition of mcm or ncm side chains at the
5-position of the uracil moity and a subset of these tRNAs also have a thio
(s2) group at the 2-position of U34 or a methylation at
the 2′ position of the ribose.The common step in synthesis of ncm5 and mcm5 side chains at
U34 in tRNAs requires at least 11 gene products (Figure 1). Deletion strains missing one of
ELP1-ELP6, KTI11, KTI12,
KTI14 or SIT4 genes, or both SAP185and
SAP190 genes completely lack the mcm5U,
mcm5s2U and ncm5U nucleosides, whereas a
kti13 deletion mutant show dramatically reduced levels of these
nucleosides [7],
[8]. In strains
with these genes mutated, no intermediates of mcm5U or ncm5U
have been detected, whereas s2U is detected in tRNAs normally containing
mcm5s2U [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12]. Thus, these gene products are required for an early step
in synthesis of mcm5 and ncm5 groups (Figure 1). The earliest intermediate in the
synthesis of mcm5U and ncm5U that has been detected is
cm5U, and there is evidence that it originates from a metabolite
related to acetyl-CoA [13] (Figure
1).
Figure 1
Model for formation of mcm5 side chain at wobble
uridines.
The Elongator complex (Elp1-Elp6) and its potential regulators are required
for the formation of cm5U. A methyl group is added to
cm5U by Trm9p/Trm112p complex in tRNA species that in their
mature form should have a mcm5 side chain. The cm5U in
other tRNA species are converted to ncm5U by an unknown enzyme.
For tRNAs that should contain a s2 group, presence of a
mcm5 or ncm5 side chain is a prerequisite for
efficient thiolation.
Model for formation of mcm5 side chain at wobble
uridines.
The Elongator complex (Elp1-Elp6) and its potential regulators are required
for the formation of cm5U. A methyl group is added to
cm5U by Trm9p/Trm112p complex in tRNA species that in their
mature form should have a mcm5 side chain. The cm5U in
other tRNA species are converted to ncm5U by an unknown enzyme.
For tRNAs that should contain a s2 group, presence of a
mcm5 or ncm5 side chain is a prerequisite for
efficient thiolation.The ELP1-ELP6 gene products form the Elongator complex that consists
of a core complex Elp1-Elp3 and a sub complex Elp4-Elp6 [14], [15], [16]. In the C-terminal part of
Elp3p there is a potential acetyl-CoA binding domain [17], and the central region
shares homology to the Radical SAM superfamily [18]. Members of this
family contain an iron-sulphur (FeS) cluster and use S-adenosylmethionine (SAM) to
catalyze a variety of radical reactions. The presence of a FeS cluster and ability
to bind SAM has been verified for the M. jannaschiiElp3p homologue
[18],
whereas no binding of SAM to S. cerevisiae Elongator complex was
observed [19].
At least Elp1 and Elp3 of Elongator core complex are in intimate contact with tRNA
that is modified with a mcm side chain at U34
[7]. The
KTI11-KTI14, SIT4 or SAP185SAP190 gene products seem to regulate the activity of Elongator complex
[20],
[21],
[22], [23], [24], [25], [26], [27], [28], [29], [30].The last step in formation of mcm5 side chain of U34 is a
methyl esterification of cm5
[13], and
requires Trm9p/Trm112p in yeast and ALKBH8/TRM112 in mammalians [31], [32], [33]. We confirm
that Trm112p is also required for the last step of mcm5 side chain
formation at position 34 in a subset of tRNAs. In vivo, Trm112p is
essential for the methyl esterification to mcm5U34, and
in vitro Trm112p improves the methyltransferase activity of
Trm9p. The observation that the major intermediates accumulating in
trm9 and trm112 mutants are ncm5U
and ncm5s2U and not the expected cm5U and
cm5s2U raises the question; what is the order of
intermediates formed in biosynthesis of the mcm5 side chain of
U34?
Materials and Methods
Yeast strains, media and genetic procedures
Strains used in this report, except those from the yeast deletion collection
(Open Biosystems), are listed in Table S1A. Yeast media, genetic procedures
and yeast transformation have been described previously [34]. To construct
mtq2::KanMX6 and trm112::KanMX6 deletions,
oligonucleotides (2104 and 2015, 1391 and 1392) in Table S1B
containing 45nt sequence homology flanking the MTQ2 and
TRM112 genes were used to amplify the
KanMX6 cassette [35]. To delete
TRM9, TRM11 and LYS9 in
W303 strains, chromosomal DNA from the corresponding null mutants in the yeast
deletion collection (Open Biosystems) were used as templates. The
KanMX6 cassette together with 300–500 base pair
flanking sequences to each gene were amplified with specific primers (1035 and
1036 for TRM9, 1950 and 1951 for TRM11, and
2059 and 2060 for LYS9) listed in Table S1B.
The PCR products were introduced into diploid yeast strain UMY3104 and
transformants were selected on YEPD plates containing 200 µg/ml Geneticin
(G418). Transformants were sporulated and tetrad analysis verified a 2∶2
segregation of mating type and G418 resistance. Deletions were confirmed by PCR.
The double mutants trm9Δ trm11Δ,
trm9Δ lys9Δ,
trm9Δ mtq2Δ,
trm11Δ lys9Δ,
trm11Δ mtq2Δ and
lys9Δ mtq2Δ were generated by crossing
the single mutants. The quadruple mutant was generated in a cross between
trm9Δ lys9Δ and
trm11Δ mtq2Δ.
Plasmid constructions
To generate the expression vector for the Trm9 protein, TRM9
gene was amplified by PCR using oligos 2015 and 2016 (Table S1B)
and W303-1A genomic DNA as template. The PCR product was digested with
BamH1 and HindIII, and subcloned to the
corresponding sites of the expression vector pRSF-Duet1 (Novagen), generating an
in frame fusion with the histidine tag. To construct the Trm9p-Trm112p
co-expression vector, the TRM112 gene was amplified from
W303-1A genomic DNA using oligos 2013 and 2014 (Table S1B)
and cloned into the pRSF-Duet1-TRM9 vector using
NdeI and XhoI.
Protein purification
The expression vectors were introduced into BL21(DE3)pLysS competent cells.
Overnight cultures of transformed cells were grown in LB media containing 50
µg/ml Kanamycin at 37°C. Cultures were diluted to OD600
0.05 and grown to OD600 0.5 at 37°C. Cultures were placed on ice
for 10 minutes. IPTG was added to a final concentration of 120 µg/ml and
protein expression was induced at 15°C overnight. Harvested cell pellets
were washed once by 0.9% NaCl and resuspended in breaking buffer (20 mM
Tris pH 8.0, 10 mM imidazole, 150 mM NaCl, 0.2% NP-40, 2 mM
β-mercaptoethanol) in the presence of proteinase inhibitor cocktail (Roche).
Cells were broken by sonication and the cell extract was clarified by
centrifugation at 16,000 g for 1 hour. The supernatant was mixed with TALON
resin, equilibrated with breaking buffer and incubated at 4°C for 2 hours.
The protein bound TALON resin was first washed with buffer 1 (20 mM Tris pH 8.0,
10 mM imidazole, 150 mM NaCl, 2 mM β-mercaptoethanol) and then with buffer 2
(20 mM Tris pH 8.0, 10 mM imidazole, 500 mM NaCl, 2 mM β-mercaptoethanol).
Proteins were eluted with 330 mM imidazole and dialyzed overnight against
storage buffer (25 mM Tris pH 8.0, 150 mM NaCl, 5 mM DTT, 10% glycerol)
and kept at 4°C for future use.
Methyltransferase reaction
In the methyltransferase reaction, 50 µl of 2X reaction buffer (200 mM Tris
7.5, 0.2 mM EDTA, 20 mM MgCl2, 20 mM NH4Cl) was mixed with
20 µl [3H]AdoMet (0.55 mCi/ml, Perkin Elmer) and 20
µg tRNA, incubated at 37°C for 5 minutes. The methyltransferase
reaction was initiated by adding 10 µg Trm9p or Trm9p-Trm112p. Aliquots of
the reaction was withdrawn at different time points and mixed with 1 ml of
5% ice cold trichloroacetic acid (TCA). The tubes were incubated on ice
for 10 minutes and samples were vacuum filtered through nitrocellulose filter
(Millipore 0.45 µm). The [3H] incorporation was
measured using a Wallac 1409 scintillation counter. To analyze
[3H] incorporation in total tRNA by HPLC, 200 µg
of tRNA was used. After 30 minutes of methyltransferase reaction, 2.5 volume of
99% ice cold ethanol was added into the reaction and samples were
centrifuged for 30 minutes in eppendorf tubes at maximum speed. The pellet was
resuspended in MQ water, digested with nuclease P1 and analyzed by HPLC [36]. The
[3H] incorporation was monitored by a flow
scintillation analyzer (Packard Bioscience).
Single tRNA isolation
Yeast cells were grown in 2L YEPD at 30°C to
OD600 = 1.5. Total tRNA was prepared as described [36]. Single tRNA
species were isolated from total tRNA by hybridizing to biotinylated
complementary oligonucleotides [36] and separated from total tRNA by attachment to
streptavidin coated Dynabeads M-280 (Invitrogen). The single tRNAs were digested
to nucleosides with nuclease P1 followed by bacterial alkaline phosphatase (BAP)
treatment [0.2 M (NH4)2SO4 pH 8.3],
and analyzed by HPLC [37].
Results and Discussion
Trm112p is required for the methyl esterification of mcm5U and
mcm5s2U
In a global analysis of protein complexes in yeast, Trm112p was found to interact
with three methyltransferases Trm9p, Trm11p and Mtq2p [38], [39], [40], [41]. In addition, Trm112p interacts
with the saccharopine dehydrogenase Lys9p, the essential DEAH-box ATP-dependent
RNA helicase Ecm16p and an essential component of the RSC chromatin remodeling
complex Sfh1p [38], [39], [40], [41]. The
N-Monomethylguanosine-10
(m2G10) methyltransferase Trm11p, as well as the eRF1
methyltranferase Mtq2p, has to be in complex with Trm112p to be active [42],
[43]. Trm9p is required for the methyl esterification of
modified uridine nucleosides, resulting in the formation of
5-methylcarbonylmethyluridine (mcm5U34) and
5-methylcarbonylmethyl-2-thiouridine
(mcm5s2U34) present in a subset of tRNA species
in yeast, including and
[31]. In the
methyl esterification reaction of these tRNAs, cm5U34 and
cm5s2U34 were suggested to be the
substrates [13], [31], [32,].Both Trm9 and Trm112 are required for methyl esterification to mcm5U
and mcm5s2U [31], [32], [33]. To analyze the tRNA
modification status in these two mutants, total tRNA from
trm9Δ, trm112Δ and wild type strains
were isolated, digested to nucleosides and analyzed by HPLC. Similar to previous
reports [31],
[32],
[33],
total tRNA isolated from trm9 and trm112
deletion mutants lacked mcm5U and mcm5s2Unucleosides (data not shown). In order to provide a more detailed analysis of
all possible nucleoside intermediates in trm9Δ and
trm112Δ mutants, single tRNA species,
, and
, were isolated from wild type,
trm9Δ and trm112Δ strains and the
purified tRNAs were digested to nucleosides and analyzed by HPLC (Figure 2, Table 1, data not shown). As
expected, the ncm5U nucleoside was present in
independent if the tRNA was isolated from
trm9Δ, trm112Δ or wild type
strains (data not shown). The mcm5U and mcm5s2Unucleosides were present in and
isolated from wild type but not from
trm9Δ and trm112Δ cells (Figure 2, Table 1). In
isolated from trm9Δ and
trm112Δ strains, we observed the appearance of
ncm5U and cm5U (Figure 2B, Table 1). Interestingly, the major
intermediate of the mcm5U nucleoside generated in the
trm9Δ and trm112Δ mutants is
ncm5U (Figure
2, Table 1).
The presence of ncm5U and cm5U has also been observed in
, and
isolated from an
alkbh8
−/− mice [32], [44]. In
isolated from the trm9Δ and
trm112Δ strains, there was a complete lack of
mcm5s2U and a concomitant increase of cm5U,
ncm5U and ncm5s2U (Table 1). The presence of cm5U
supports the earlier observation that formation of a completed mcm5
side chain appears to be a prerequisite for efficient and complete thiolation of
position 2 in mcm5s2U containing tRNAs [10], [11], [12], [32]. An
unexpected observation was that the major species accumulating in
and isolated from
trm9Δ and trm112Δ strains were
ncm5U and ncm5s2U, respectively (Table 1). We considered the
possibility that the ncm5 side chain was spontaneously generated from
cm5 by amidation during the bacterial alkaline phosphatase (BAP)
treatment in the digestion step of tRNA to nucleosides for HPLC analysis. To
test this hypothesis, synthetic cm5U nucleoside was treated in the
same way as in the digestion step of tRNA and analyzed by HPLC (Figure 3). We did not detect
any conversion of cm5U to ncm5U (Figure 3) indicating that formation of
ncm5U is enzymatically catalyzed and not an artifact of the
sample preparation procedure.
Figure 2
trm9 and trm112 mutants are lacking
the mcm5 side-chain in at wobble
uridines.
HPLC analysis of modified tRNA nucleosides from wild-type (UMY3169, left
panels), trm9::KanMX4 (Open Biosystems, middle panels)
and trm112::KanMX4 (UMY3330, right panels). Arrows in
red and black indicate expected retention time of mcm5U and
cm5U, respectively. Arrow heads in red and black indicate
expected retention time of m2G and ncm5U,
respectively. (A), Part of the chromatogram between retention times 34
and 44 min is shown. (B), Part of the chromatogram between retention
times 7 and 17 min is shown. The small peak in wild-type at 14 min
represents an unrelated compound with a spectrum different from
ncm5U. The chromatograms were monitored at 254 nm.
Table 1
Relative amounts of various modified nucleosides in
and
isolated
from wild type, trm9Δ and
trm112Δ strains.
cm5U/Ψ
ncm5U/Ψ
mcm5U/Ψ
cm5U/Ψ
ncm5U/Ψ
mcm5U/Ψ
cm5s2U/Ψ
ncm5s2U/Ψ
mcm5s2U/Ψ
WT
0.016
0.044
0.183
ND
ND
ND
0.029
ND
0.220
trm9Δ
0.051
0.199
ND
0.065
0.028
ND
0.013
0.191
ND
trm112Δ
0.046
0.149
ND
0.044
0.044
ND
0.022
0.161
ND
Pseudouridine (Ψ) was used as the internal control. The numbers
displayed are the ratios (modified nucleoside/Ψ). ND: not
detected. The modified nucleosides cm5U,
ncm5U, mcm5U and Ψ were monitored at 254
nm, and cm5s2U, ncm5s2U
and mcm5s2U were monitored at 314 nm as
thiolated nucleosides absorb well at this wavelength, while
nonthiolated nucleosides do not.
Figure 3
Nucleoside ncm5U is not generated by amidation of
cm5U during conversion of tRNA into nucleosides.
Synthetic cm5U (A and B) or a mixture of synthetic
cm5U and ncm5U (C and D) were treated with
nuclease P1 for 16 hours, followed by a 2 hours incubation with either
water (A and C) or bacterial alkaline phosphatase (BAP) (B and D). Parts
of the chromatogram of HPLC analysis between 5 and 20 min are shown. The
chromatograms were monitored at 254 nm.
trm9 and trm112 mutants are lacking
the mcm5 side-chain in at wobble
uridines.
HPLC analysis of modified tRNA nucleosides from wild-type (UMY3169, left
panels), trm9::KanMX4 (Open Biosystems, middle panels)
and trm112::KanMX4 (UMY3330, right panels). Arrows in
red and black indicate expected retention time of mcm5U and
cm5U, respectively. Arrow heads in red and black indicate
expected retention time of m2G and ncm5U,
respectively. (A), Part of the chromatogram between retention times 34
and 44 min is shown. (B), Part of the chromatogram between retention
times 7 and 17 min is shown. The small peak in wild-type at 14 min
represents an unrelated compound with a spectrum different from
ncm5U. The chromatograms were monitored at 254 nm.
Nucleoside ncm5U is not generated by amidation of
cm5U during conversion of tRNA into nucleosides.
Synthetic cm5U (A and B) or a mixture of synthetic
cm5U and ncm5U (C and D) were treated with
nuclease P1 for 16 hours, followed by a 2 hours incubation with either
water (A and C) or bacterial alkaline phosphatase (BAP) (B and D). Parts
of the chromatogram of HPLC analysis between 5 and 20 min are shown. The
chromatograms were monitored at 254 nm.Pseudouridine (Ψ) was used as the internal control. The numbers
displayed are the ratios (modified nucleoside/Ψ). ND: not
detected. The modified nucleosidescm5U,
ncm5U, mcm5U and Ψ were monitored at 254
nm, and cm5s2U, ncm5s2U
and mcm5s2U were monitored at 314 nm as
thiolated nucleosides absorb well at this wavelength, while
nonthiolated nucleosides do not.In addition to Trm9p, Trm112p also interacts with Trm11p, Lys9p and Mtq2p encoded
by non-essential genes, and Ecm16p and Sph1p encoded by essential genes [38], [39], [40], [41]. Therefore, we
also analyzed single tRNA species ,
and from
trm11Δ, lys9Δ and
mtq2Δ strains. Trm11p and Trm112p are essential for
formation of the m2G nucleoside [42]. Consistently,
isolated from trm11Δ or
trm112Δ strains does not have the m2G
modified nucleoside, whereas the same tRNA from wild-type has m2G
(Figure 2 and S1). In
single tRNAs from lys9Δ and mtq2Δ
strains, there was no notable change in modified nucleosides as assessed by HPLC
analysis (Figure
S1, data not shown). A deletion of the TRM112 gene
causes a dramatic reduction in growth and a mtq2Δ strain
also shows a clear reduction in growth, whereas trm11Δ,
lys9Δ or trm9Δ strains show mild
growth defects in YEPD medium at both 30°C and 37°C (Figure 4). We considered the
possibility that strains with multiple null alleles of genes encoding Trm112p
interacting proteins would show additive growth defects, possibly mimicking a
trm112Δ null allele. Since two Trm112p associated
proteins, Ecm16 and Sfh1, are encoded by essential genes, we were only able to
make strains with combinations of the trm11Δ,
lys9Δ, trm9Δ, and
mtq2Δ alleles. We first made the double mutants
trm11Δ lys9Δ,
trm11Δ trm9Δ,
trm11Δ mtq2Δ,
lys9Δ trm9Δ,
lys9Δ mtq2Δ and
trm9Δ mtq2Δ. No additive growth
reduction was observed in any of the constructs at both 30°C and 37°C
(Figure 4, data not
shown), in contrast to the previously observed growth defect of the
trm9Δ mtq2Δ mutant [33]. Further
we made a trm11Δ lys9Δ
trm9Δ, mtq2Δ quadruple mutant
strain that grew like a mtq2Δ strain at both 30°C and
37°C (Figure 4). These
data show that the poor growth of trm112Δ cells is not
entirely caused by defects in tRNA modification, eRF1 methylation and
dehydrogenase activity in the quadruple mutant. Possibly it is caused by reduced
function of Ecm16p or Sfh1p which might require the interaction with Trm112p to
be fully active.
Figure 4
Growth phenotypes.
Wild type (UMY2067), trm112Δ (UMY3679),
trm9Δ (UMY3267), trm11Δ
(UMY3677), lys9Δ (UMY3650),
mtq2Δ (UMY3675), trm9Δ
mtq2Δ (UMY3673) and trm9Δ
trm11Δ lys9Δ
mtq2Δ (UMY3680) strains were cultivated in YEPD
at 30°C and 37°C.
Growth phenotypes.
Wild type (UMY2067), trm112Δ (UMY3679),
trm9Δ (UMY3267), trm11Δ
(UMY3677), lys9Δ (UMY3650),
mtq2Δ (UMY3675), trm9Δ
mtq2Δ (UMY3673) and trm9Δ
trm11Δ lys9Δ
mtq2Δ (UMY3680) strains were cultivated in YEPD
at 30°C and 37°C.
Trm112p/Trm9p complex efficiently incorporates methyl groups into
trm9 substrate tRNA in vitro
Trm9p has been shown to catalyze the methyl esterification to mcm5U
and mcm5s2U in vitro
[31]. We
cloned the TRM9 gene into the expression vector pRSF duet to
produce 6xHis-Trm9p recombinant protein in E. coli. We also
made a pRSF duet vector construct, simultaneously expressing the 6xHis-Trm9p
recombinant protein and a non-tagged Trm112p. When Trm9p was expressed alone,
the majority of Trm9p recombinant protein was insoluble (Figure 5A), and the solubility of Trm9p
dramatically improved when Trm112p was co-expressed with Trm9p. Purification of
Trm9p by virtue of its 6xHis tag resulted in co-purification of Trm112p (Figure 5A), indicating that
Trm9p forms a stable complex with Trm112p.
Figure 5
Trm9p/Trm112p complex efficiently catalyzes the methyl incorporation
into trm9 substrate tRNA.
(A) SDS-PAGE analysis of histidine tagged Trm9p expressed alone or
co-expressed with Trm112p and purified from E. coli.
The gel was stained with Colloidal Blue (Invitrogen). Lane 1: Molecular
weight standard (PageRuler prestained, Fermentas). Lane 2: Soluble
fraction of extract from E. coli strains expressing
Trm112p and histidine tagged Trm9p. Lane 3: Soluble fraction of extract
from E. coli strains expressing histidine tagged Trm9p.
Lane 4: Pellet from crude extract of E. coli strains
expressing Trm112p and histidine tagged Trm9p. Lane 5: Pellet from crude
extract of E. coli strains expressing histidine tagged
Trm9p. Lane 6: Trm112p co-purified with histidine tagged Trm9 protein.
Lane 7: Purified histidine tagged Trm9 protein. (B)
[3H] methyl incorporation into tRNA as a function
of time. Substrates were total tRNA preparations from strain UMY2067
(wild-type) and UMY3267 (trm9Δ). (▪) and
(▴) are methyl incorporation reactions into wild-type tRNA by
using Trm9p or Trm9p/Trm112p as enzyme. (○) is methyl incorporation
reaction into trm9 tRNA by using Trm9p as enzyme. (C).
The methyl incorporation into trm9 tRNA using
Trm9p/Trm112p as enzyme (◊), in addition to the reactions in
(B).
Trm9p/Trm112p complex efficiently catalyzes the methyl incorporation
into trm9 substrate tRNA.
(A) SDS-PAGE analysis of histidine tagged Trm9p expressed alone or
co-expressed with Trm112p and purified from E. coli.
The gel was stained with Colloidal Blue (Invitrogen). Lane 1: Molecular
weight standard (PageRuler prestained, Fermentas). Lane 2: Soluble
fraction of extract from E. coli strains expressing
Trm112p and histidine tagged Trm9p. Lane 3: Soluble fraction of extract
from E. coli strains expressing histidine tagged Trm9p.
Lane 4: Pellet from crude extract of E. coli strains
expressing Trm112p and histidine tagged Trm9p. Lane 5: Pellet from crude
extract of E. coli strains expressing histidine tagged
Trm9p. Lane 6: Trm112p co-purified with histidine tagged Trm9 protein.
Lane 7: Purified histidine tagged Trm9 protein. (B)
[3H] methyl incorporation into tRNA as a function
of time. Substrates were total tRNA preparations from strain UMY2067
(wild-type) and UMY3267 (trm9Δ). (▪) and
(▴) are methyl incorporation reactions into wild-type tRNA by
using Trm9p or Trm9p/Trm112p as enzyme. (○) is methyl incorporation
reaction into trm9 tRNA by using Trm9p as enzyme. (C).
The methyl incorporation into trm9 tRNA using
Trm9p/Trm112p as enzyme (◊), in addition to the reactions in
(B).Purified Trm9p and Trm9/Trm112p complex was used to methylate total tRNA isolated
from wild type and a trm9 deletion strains in
vitro. Saponification of total tRNA with sodium hydroxide leads to
the production of cm5U and cm5s2U from
mcm5U and mcm5s2U, and this method has
previously been used to generate substrates for Trm9p or ALKBH8 [31], [32].
However, saponification also efficiently degrades tRNA and we found that tRNA
isolated from the trm9 deletion strain was a superior substrate
in the methyl esterification assay (data not shown). To track methylation of
tRNA substrates in vitro, S-adenosylmethionine containing a
tritiated methyl donor group was used together with tRNA and purified enzyme.
When total tRNA from wild type was used as a substrate, there was a small
increase in incorporation of radioactive methyl groups with time using either
Trm9p or the Trm9p/Trm112p complex (Figure 5B). In contrast, use of total tRNA from the
trm9Δ strain and Trm9p leads to a clear but modest
increase in the incorporation of radioactive methyl groups (Figure 5B). Moreover, the incorporation of
radioactive methyl groups was 20-fold more efficient using Trm9p/Trm112p over
Trm9p alone (Figure 5C).
Thus, Trm112p is required for Trm9p to methylate its substrate tRNA more
efficiently in vitro and is a prerequisite in
vivo as no mcm5nucleosides are formed in a
trm112Δ mutant (Figure 2, Table 1). In the reaction using tRNA from the
trm9Δ strain and Trm9p/Trm112p, there was a rapid
incorporation of [3H] methyl groups in the first 5 minutes
that entered to a plateau after 30 minutes (Figure 5C). The reduced incorporation was not
due to enzyme inactivation with time as adding more enzyme at 30 minutes did not
improve incorporation of radioactivity (data not shown).Based on HPLC analysis, there is an accumulation of cm5U,
ncm5U, and ncm5s2U in total tRNA from a
trm9Δ strain compared with a wild-type strain [33] (data not
shown). When tRNA isolated from a trm9Δ strain was used as
substrate in vitro, we observed a reduction of the
cm5U nucleoside and appearance of mcm5U (Figure 6A-D, Table 2) consistent with
cm5U being the substrate of Trm9 [31], [32], [33]. Furthermore, the
relative amounts of ncm5U and ncm5s2U did not
change after the methylation reaction, showing that these two nucleosides are
not substrates of Trm9p/Trm112p under these conditions (Table 2) [33]. By using saponified
tRNA, cm5s2U was suggested to be a substrate for Trm9p or
ALKBH8/Trm112 [31], [32]. However, cm5s2U was not
detected in total tRNA isolated from trm9 or
trm112 mutants [33]. In our analysis of
trm9 total tRNA, we observed a very small peak migrating in
the position of cm5s2U, which was absent after the
methylation reaction (Figure
6G-H, Table 2).
When [3H]-CH3 was monitored by flow
scintillation analyzer coupled to the HPLC, we found that the incorporated
radioactivity migrated with retention times identical to those known for
mcm5U and mcm5s2U nucleosides (Figure 6D, F and H). As the
signal for the tentative cm5s2U is very weak, we cannot
exclude the possibility that mcm5s2U originated from
another species. These observations are consistent with those shown by Kalhor
and Clarke [31], [32] and fully support the assertion that Trm9p is the
methyltransferase catalyzing the formation of mcm5U from
cm5U. Why and how ncm5U and
ncm5s2U accumulates in tRNAs from strains lacking
Trm9p or Trm112p, remains to be elucidated.
Figure 6
HPLC analysis of total trm9 tRNA after methyl
incorporation by using Trm9p/Trm112p as enzyme.
(A–B) Part of the chromatogram between retention time 10 and 19 min
is shown. The arrow in B indicates the expected retention time of
cm5U. (C–D). Part of the chromatogram between
retention time 34 and 45 min is shown. The arrow in C indicates the
expected retention time of mcm5U. (E–F). Part of the
chromatogram between retention time 47 and 52 min is shown. The arrow in
E indicates the expected retention time of
mcm5s2U. (G–H). Part of the chromatogram
between retention time 26 and 52 min is shown. Open and closed
arrowheads in G and H indicate the expected retention time of
mcm5s2U and cm5U, respectively.
Chromatograms in A–F were monitored at 254 nm and at 314 nm in
G–H. The dashed line in D, F and H indicates the migration of
isotope labeled nucleoside which overlaps with mcm5U and
mcm5s2U, respectively. The Y axis to the left
corresponds to absorbance units and the Y axis to the right shows the
[3H] incorporation in cpm.
Table 2
Relative amounts of various modified nucleosides of total tRNA
isolated from the trm9Δ strain before and after
methylation reaction.
cm5U/Ψ
ncm5U/Ψ
mcm5U/Ψ
cm5s2U/Ψ
ncm5s2U/Ψ
mcm5s2U/Ψ
Before reaction
0.01752
0.04634
ND
0.00081
0.00571
ND
After reaction
0.00227
0.04707
0.01720
ND
0.00521
0.00132
Pseudouridine (Ψ) was used as the internal control. The numbers
displayed are the ratios (modified nucleoside/Ψ). ND: not
detected. The modified nucleosides cm5U,
ncm5U, mcm5U and Ψ were monitored at 254
nm, and cm5s2U, ncm5s2U
and mcm5s2U were monitored at 314 nm as
thiolated nucleosides absorb well at this wavelength, while
nonthiolated nucleosides do not.
HPLC analysis of total trm9 tRNA after methyl
incorporation by using Trm9p/Trm112p as enzyme.
(A–B) Part of the chromatogram between retention time 10 and 19 min
is shown. The arrow in B indicates the expected retention time of
cm5U. (C–D). Part of the chromatogram between
retention time 34 and 45 min is shown. The arrow in C indicates the
expected retention time of mcm5U. (E–F). Part of the
chromatogram between retention time 47 and 52 min is shown. The arrow in
E indicates the expected retention time of
mcm5s2U. (G–H). Part of the chromatogram
between retention time 26 and 52 min is shown. Open and closed
arrowheads in G and H indicate the expected retention time of
mcm5s2U and cm5U, respectively.
Chromatograms in A–F were monitored at 254 nm and at 314 nm in
G–H. The dashed line in D, F and H indicates the migration of
isotope labeled nucleoside which overlaps with mcm5U and
mcm5s2U, respectively. The Y axis to the left
corresponds to absorbance units and the Y axis to the right shows the
[3H] incorporation in cpm.Pseudouridine (Ψ) was used as the internal control. The numbers
displayed are the ratios (modified nucleoside/Ψ). ND: not
detected. The modified nucleosidescm5U,
ncm5U, mcm5U and Ψ were monitored at 254
nm, and cm5s2U, ncm5s2U
and mcm5s2U were monitored at 314 nm as
thiolated nucleosides absorb well at this wavelength, while
nonthiolated nucleosides do not.
Alternative mechanisms in formation of the mcm5 side chain at
wobble position
In trm9Δ or trm112Δ strains, the major
species generated are ncm5U and ncm5s2U instead
of the expected cm5U or cm5s2U. According to
the model proposed in Figure
1, Elongator complex is required for and might directly catalyze the
formation of cm5U. In the presence of Trm9 and Trm112p,
cm5U is rapidly converted to mcm5U in tRNAs destined
to contain a mcm5U nucleoside. Those tRNAs destined to contain
ncm5U are not recognized by Trm9p/Trm112p and ncm5U is
formed by an uncharacterized enzyme. In order to account for the presence of
ncm5U and ncm5s2U in tRNAs that normally
should contain mcm5U and mcm5s2U, one has to
postulate that in the absence of Trm9p/Trm112p the uncharacterized enzyme
responsible for amidation also recognizes these tRNA substrates (Figure 2). For tRNAs that
should contain a s2 group, the presence of a mcm5 side
chain has been suggested to be a prerequisite for efficient thiolation [10], [12]. We suggest
that the presence of ncm5U, but not cm5U, in these tRNAs
also promotes efficient thiolation, resulting in accumulation of
ncm5s2U (Table 1).The observation that the major U34 intermediates in
and are
ncm5U and ncm5s2U in trm9
and trm112 mutants also supports an alternative model, i. e.
ncm5U is generated before cm5U (Figure 7). Such a model would require a
conversion of ncm5U to cm5U before the Trm9p/Trm112p
complex finally can form mcm5U. A similar mechanism has been
described in Eubacteria that have mnm5 instead of mcm5
side chains and the first intermediate in its synthesis is cmnm5U
[45].
The bi-functional MnmC demodifies cmnm5U to nm5U and
thereafter methylates nm5U to form mnm5U [45], [46], [47]. By
analogy, the Trm9p/Trm112p complex may be involved in two reactions; deamination
of ncm5U to cm5U, and then catalyzing formation of
mcm5U. The deaminase activity is not necessarily part of Trm9p or
Trm112p. In the absence of Trm9p or Trm112p, ncm5U accumulates in
tRNAs destined to contain mcm5s2U,
like. As postulated in model 1, the presence of an
ncm5 side chain in these tRNAs promotes thiolation, generating
ncm5s2U. MnmC requires flavin adenine dinucleotide
(FAD) as co-factor in the de-modification reaction and SAM in the methylation
reaction. We performed an in vitro reaction with
[3H]AdoMet in the presence or absence of FAD. We
assumed if ncm5U is converted to cm5U in the presence of
FAD, more [3H]-methyl groups would be incorporated into
total tRNA isolated from trm9 deletion strain when FAD is
included in the reaction. Reactions conducted in the presence of FAD did not
increase the incorporation of [3H]-methyl into
trm9 deletion tRNA, nor did it decrease the overall amount
of ncm5U as analyzed by HPLC (data not shown). We also investigated
the potential use of other cofactors in the conversion of ncm5U to
cm5U such as NAD+ and NADP+
without success (data not shown). It remains to be elucidated which of these two
alternative pathways for formation of mcm5 side chains is used.
Figure 7
An alternative model for formation of mcm5 side chain at
wobble uridines.
Elongator complex (Elp1-Elp6) and its potential regulators catalyzes the
formation of ncm5U. The ncm5U is converted to
cm5U by an unknown mechanism in tRNA species that in
their mature form should have a mcm5 side chain. This unknown
mechanism requires Trm9p/Trm112p. In the last step, a methyl group is
added to cm5U by Trm9p/Trm112p complex in these tRNA species.
For tRNAs that should contain a s2 group, presence of a
mcm5 or ncm5 side chain is a prerequisite for
efficient thiolation.
An alternative model for formation of mcm5 side chain at
wobble uridines.
Elongator complex (Elp1-Elp6) and its potential regulators catalyzes the
formation of ncm5U. The ncm5U is converted to
cm5U by an unknown mechanism in tRNA species that in
their mature form should have a mcm5 side chain. This unknown
mechanism requires Trm9p/Trm112p. In the last step, a methyl group is
added to cm5U by Trm9p/Trm112p complex in these tRNA species.
For tRNAs that should contain a s2 group, presence of a
mcm5 or ncm5 side chain is a prerequisite for
efficient thiolation.HPLC analysis of modified nucleosides in
isolated
from wild-type,
Δ,
Δ and
Δ strains.
Arrows in red and black indicate expected retention time of mcm5U
and cm5U, respectively. Arrow heads in red and black indicate
expected retention time of m2G and ncm5U,
respectively. (A–D), Part of the chromatogram between retention times
34 and 44 min is shown. (B), Part of the chromatogram between retention
times 7 and 17 min is shown. The small peak in wild-type at 14 min
represents an unrelated compound with a spectrum different from
ncm5U. Absorbance at 254 nm (AU) was used to create the
chromatograms.(EPS)Click here for additional data file.Strains and primers used in this study (see also [48] and [49]).(DOC)Click here for additional data file.
Authors: Thodoris G Petrakis; T Max M Søgaard; Hediye Erdjument-Bromage; Paul Tempst; Jesper Q Svejstrup Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2005-03-16 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: B O Wittschieben; G Otero; T de Bizemont; J Fellows; H Erdjument-Bromage; R Ohba; Y Li; C D Allis; P Tempst; J Q Svejstrup Journal: Mol Cell Date: 1999-07 Impact factor: 17.970
Authors: G Otero; J Fellows; Y Li; T de Bizemont; A M Dirac; C M Gustafsson; H Erdjument-Bromage; P Tempst; J Q Svejstrup Journal: Mol Cell Date: 1999-01 Impact factor: 17.970
Authors: M S Longtine; A McKenzie; D J Demarini; N G Shah; A Wach; A Brachat; P Philippsen; J R Pringle Journal: Yeast Date: 1998-07 Impact factor: 3.239
Authors: Sunil Laxman; Benjamin M Sutter; Xi Wu; Sujai Kumar; Xiaofeng Guo; David C Trudgian; Hamid Mirzaei; Benjamin P Tu Journal: Cell Date: 2013-07-18 Impact factor: 41.582
Authors: Joana F Tavares; Nick K Davis; Ana Poim; Andreia Reis; Stefanie Kellner; Inês Sousa; Ana R Soares; Gabriela M R Moura; Peter C Dedon; Manuel Santos Journal: RNA Biol Date: 2020-09-17 Impact factor: 4.652
Authors: Phillip J McCown; Agnieszka Ruszkowska; Charlotte N Kunkler; Kurtis Breger; Jacob P Hulewicz; Matthew C Wang; Noah A Springer; Jessica A Brown Journal: Wiley Interdiscip Rev RNA Date: 2020-04-16 Impact factor: 9.349