Literature DB >> 21680977

"If I could in a small way help": motivations for and beliefs about sample donation for genetic research.

Marsha Michie1, Gail Henderson, Joanne Garrett, Giselle Corbie-Smith.   

Abstract

Human genome research depends upon participants who donate genetic samples, but few studies have explored in depth the motivations of genetic research donors. This mixed methods study examines telephone interviews with 752 sample donors in a U.S. genetic epidemiology study investigating colorectal cancer. Quantitative and qualitative results indicate that most participants wanted to help society, and that many also wanted information about their own health, even though such information was not promised. Qualitative analysis reveals that donors believed their samples contributed to a scientific "common good"; imagined samples as information rather than tissues; and often blurred distinctions between research and diagnostic testing of samples. Differences between African American and White perspectives were distinct from educational and other possible explanatory factors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21680977      PMCID: PMC3313647          DOI: 10.1525/jer.2011.6.2.57

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics        ISSN: 1556-2646            Impact factor:   1.742


  23 in total

1.  Distrust, race, and research.

Authors:  Giselle Corbie-Smith; Stephen B Thomas; Diane Marie M St George
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2002-11-25

2.  Consent forms and the therapeutic misconception: the example of gene transfer research.

Authors:  Nancy M P King; Gail E Henderson; Larry R Churchill; Arlene M Davis; Sara Chandros Hull; Daniel K Nelson; P Christy Parham-Vetter; Barbara Bluestone Rothschild; Michele M Easter; Benjamin S Wilfond
Journal:  IRB       Date:  2005 Jan-Feb

3.  Research with stored biological samples: what do research participants want?

Authors:  Donna T Chen; Donald L Rosenstein; Palaniappan Muthappan; Susan G Hilsenbeck; Franklin G Miller; Ezekiel J Emanuel; David Wendler
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2005-03-28

4.  Volunteer human subjects' understandings of their participation in a biomedical research experiment.

Authors:  Norma Morris; Brian Bàlmer
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2005-08-08       Impact factor: 4.634

5.  False hopes and best data: consent to research and the therapeutic misconception.

Authors:  P S Appelbaum; L H Roth; C W Lidz; P Benson; W Winslade
Journal:  Hastings Cent Rep       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 2.683

6.  Why do they do it? A pilot study towards understanding participant motivation and experience in a large genetic epidemiological study of endometriosis.

Authors:  Susan A Treloar; Katherine I Morley; Sandra D Taylor; Wayne D Hall
Journal:  Community Genet       Date:  2007

7.  Studying genetic research participants: lessons from the "Learning About Research in North Carolina" study.

Authors:  Giselle Corbie-Smith; Connie Blumenthal; Gail Henderson; Joanne Garrett; Jada Bussey-Jones; Mairead Moloney; Robert S Sandler; Stacey W Lloyd; Jessica Dorrance; Jane Darter
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 4.254

8.  "What are they going to do with the information?" Latino/Latina and African American perspectives on the Human Genome Project.

Authors:  Amy Schulz; Cleopatra Caldwell; Sarah Foster
Journal:  Health Educ Behav       Date:  2003-04

9.  Beyond "misunderstanding": written information and decisions about taking part in a genetic epidemiology study.

Authors:  Mary Dixon-Woods; Richard E Ashcroft; Clare J Jackson; Martin D Tobin; Joelle Kivits; Paul R Burton; Nilesh J Samani
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2007-09-29       Impact factor: 4.634

10.  Consent for genetic research in a general population: the NHANES experience.

Authors:  Geraldine M McQuillan; Kathryn S Porter; Maria Agelli; Raynard Kington
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2003 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 8.822

View more
  16 in total

1.  The meaning of genetic research results: reflections from individuals with and without a known genetic disorder.

Authors:  R Jean Cadigan; Marsha Michie; Gail Henderson; Arlene M Davis; Laura M Beskow
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.742

2.  Attitudes Regarding Enrollment in a Genetic Research Project: An Informed Consent Simulation Study Comparing Views of People With Depression, Diabetes, and Neither Condition.

Authors:  Jane Paik Kim; Katie Ryan; Laura Weiss Roberts
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2019-07-22       Impact factor: 1.742

3.  Authorization of tissues from deceased patients for genetic research.

Authors:  Maureen Wilson-Genderson; K Laura Barker; Heather M Gardiner; Maghboeba Mosavel; Jeffrey Thomas; Laura A Siminoff
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2017-12-04       Impact factor: 4.132

Review 4.  Postmortem brain tissue as an underutilized resource to study the molecular pathology of neuropsychiatric disorders across different ethnic populations.

Authors:  Eric Vornholt; Dan Luo; Wenying Qiu; Gowon O McMichael; Yangyang Liu; Nathan Gillespie; Chao Ma; Vladimir I Vladimirov
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2019-04-24       Impact factor: 8.989

5.  Discussing race-related limitations of genomic testing for colon cancer risk: implications for education and counseling.

Authors:  Morgan N Butrick; Lauren Vanhusen; Kara-Grace Leventhal; Gillian W Hooker; Rachel Nusbaum; Beth N Peshkin; Yasmin Salehizadeh; Jessica Pavlick; Marc D Schwartz; Kristi D Graves
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2014-05-15       Impact factor: 4.634

6.  Flexible positions, managed hopes: the promissory bioeconomy of a whole genome sequencing cancer study.

Authors:  Rachel Haase; Marsha Michie; Debra Skinner
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2015-02-13       Impact factor: 4.634

7.  The Precision Medicine Nation.

Authors:  Maya Sabatello; Paul S Appelbaum
Journal:  Hastings Cent Rep       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 2.683

8.  Attitudes of African Americans toward return of results from exome and whole genome sequencing.

Authors:  Joon-Ho Yu; Julia Crouch; Seema M Jamal; Holly K Tabor; Michael J Bamshad
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 2.802

9.  The Meaning of Informed Consent: Genome Editing Clinical Trials for Sickle Cell Disease.

Authors:  Stacy Desine; Brittany M Hollister; Khadijah E Abdallah; Anitra Persaud; Sara Chandros Hull; Vence L Bonham
Journal:  AJOB Empir Bioeth       Date:  2020-10-12

10.  Balancing Benefits and Risks of Immortal Data: Participants' Views of Open Consent in the Personal Genome Project.

Authors:  Oscar A Zarate; Julia Green Brody; Phil Brown; Mónica D Ramirez-Andreotta; Laura Perovich; Jacob Matz
Journal:  Hastings Cent Rep       Date:  2015-12-17       Impact factor: 2.683

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.