Literature DB >> 23610051

Attitudes of African Americans toward return of results from exome and whole genome sequencing.

Joon-Ho Yu1, Julia Crouch, Seema M Jamal, Holly K Tabor, Michael J Bamshad.   

Abstract

Exome sequencing and whole genome sequencing (ES/WGS) present patients and research participants with the opportunity to benefit from a broad scope of genetic results of clinical and personal utility. Yet, this potential for benefit also risks disenfranchising populations such as African Americans (AAs) that are already underrepresented in genetic research and utilize genetic tests at lower rates than other populations. Understanding a diverse range of perspectives on consenting for ES/WGS and receiving ES/WGS results is necessary to ensure parity in genomic health care and research. We conducted a series of 13 focus groups (n = 76) to investigate if and how attitudes toward participation in ES/WGS research and return of results from ES/WGS differ between self-described AAs and non-AAs. The majority of both AAs and non-AAs were willing to participate in WGS studies and receive individual genetic results, but the fraction not interested in either was higher in AAs. This is due in part to different expectations of health benefits from ES/WGS and how results should be managed. Our results underscore the need to develop and test culturally tailored strategies for returning ES/WGS results to AAs.
Copyright © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23610051      PMCID: PMC3635144          DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.35914

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med Genet A        ISSN: 1552-4825            Impact factor:   2.802


  43 in total

1.  Distrust, race, and research.

Authors:  Giselle Corbie-Smith; Stephen B Thomas; Diane Marie M St George
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2002-11-25

2.  Increased uptake of BRCA1/2 genetic testing among African American women with a recent diagnosis of breast cancer.

Authors:  Lisa R Susswein; Cécile Skrzynia; Leslie A Lange; Jessica K Booker; Mark L Graham; James P Evans
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-01-01       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Public perspectives on returning genetics and genomics research results.

Authors:  J O'Daniel; S B Haga
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2011-05-07       Impact factor: 2.000

4.  Evolution and functional impact of rare coding variation from deep sequencing of human exomes.

Authors:  Jacob A Tennessen; Abigail W Bigham; Timothy D O'Connor; Wenqing Fu; Eimear E Kenny; Simon Gravel; Sean McGee; Ron Do; Xiaoming Liu; Goo Jun; Hyun Min Kang; Daniel Jordan; Suzanne M Leal; Stacey Gabriel; Mark J Rieder; Goncalo Abecasis; David Altshuler; Deborah A Nickerson; Eric Boerwinkle; Shamil Sunyaev; Carlos D Bustamante; Michael J Bamshad; Joshua M Akey
Journal:  Science       Date:  2012-05-17       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Public perspectives about pharmacogenetic testing and managing ancillary findings.

Authors:  Susanne B Haga; Genevieve Tindall; Julianne M O'Daniel
Journal:  Genet Test Mol Biomarkers       Date:  2011-11-02

6.  The emergence of an ethical duty to disclose genetic research results: international perspectives.

Authors:  Bartha Maria Knoppers; Yann Joly; Jacques Simard; Francine Durocher
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2006-07-26       Impact factor: 4.246

7.  Association between temporal orientation and attitudes about BRCA1/2 testing among women of African descent with family histories of breast cancer.

Authors:  Tiffany A Edwards; Hayley S Thompson; Naa Oyo A Kwate; Karen Brown; Margaret M McGovern; Andrea Forman; Nidhi Kapil-Pair; Lina Jandorf; Dana H Bovbjerg; Heiddis B Valdimarsdottir
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2008-05-13

8.  Secondary researchers' duties to return incidental findings and individual research results: a partial-entrustment account.

Authors:  Henry S Richardson; Mildred K Cho
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2012-02-23       Impact factor: 8.822

9.  Taxonomizing, sizing, and overcoming the incidentalome.

Authors:  Isaac S Kohane; Michael Hsing; Sek Won Kong
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2012-02-09       Impact factor: 8.822

10.  Incidental findings of therapeutic misconception in biobank-based research.

Authors:  Colin M E Halverson; Lainie Friedman Ross
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2012-01-26       Impact factor: 8.822

View more
  46 in total

1.  Preferences for return of incidental findings from genome sequencing among women diagnosed with breast cancer at a young age.

Authors:  K A Kaphingst; J Ivanovich; B B Biesecker; R Dresser; J Seo; L G Dressler; P J Goodfellow; M S Goodman
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2015-05-05       Impact factor: 4.438

Review 2.  Ethical conundrums in pediatric genomics.

Authors:  Seth J Rotz; Eric Kodish
Journal:  Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program       Date:  2018-11-30

3.  Community dissemination and genetic research: moving beyond results reporting.

Authors:  Susan Brown Trinidad; Evette J Ludman; Scarlett Hopkins; Rosalina D James; Theresa J Hoeft; Annie Kinegak; Henry Lupie; Ralph Kinegak; Bert B Boyer; Wylie Burke
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2015-04-21       Impact factor: 2.802

4.  Trust, Precision Medicine Research, and Equitable Participation of Underserved Populations.

Authors:  Maya Sabatello; Shawneequa Callier; Nanibaa' A Garrison; Elizabeth G Cohn
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 11.229

5.  The Genomic Medicine Integrative Research Framework: A Conceptual Framework for Conducting Genomic Medicine Research.

Authors:  Carol R Horowitz; Lori A Orlando; Anne M Slavotinek; Josh Peterson; Frank Angelo; Barbara Biesecker; Vence L Bonham; Linda D Cameron; Stephanie M Fullerton; Bruce D Gelb; Katrina A B Goddard; Benyam Hailu; Ragan Hart; Lucia A Hindorff; Gail P Jarvik; Dave Kaufman; Eimear E Kenny; Sara J Knight; Barbara A Koenig; Bruce R Korf; Ebony Madden; Amy L McGuire; Jeffrey Ou; Melissa P Wasserstein; Mimsie Robinson; Howard Leventhal; Saskia C Sanderson
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2019-05-16       Impact factor: 11.025

6.  In Different Voices: The Views of People with Disabilities about Return of Results from Precision Medicine Research.

Authors:  Maya Sabatello; Yuan Zhang; Ying Chen; Paul S Appelbaum
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 2.000

7.  Perceptions regarding genetic testing in populations at risk for nephropathy.

Authors:  Barry I Freedman; Alison J Fletcher; Vivek R Sanghani; Mitzie Spainhour; Angelina W Graham; Gregory B Russell; Jessica N Cooke Bailey; Ana S Iltis; Nancy M P King
Journal:  Am J Nephrol       Date:  2013-11-21       Impact factor: 3.754

8.  Research Participants' Attitudes towards Receiving Information on Genetic Susceptibility to Arsenic Toxicity in Rural Bangladesh.

Authors:  Lizeth I Tamayo; Hannah Lin; Alauddin Ahmed; Hasan Shahriar; Rabiul Hasan; Golam Sarwar; Hem Mahbubul Eunus; Habibul Ahsan; Brandon L Pierce
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2020-02-18       Impact factor: 2.000

9.  Engaging African American Men as Citizen Scientists to Validate a Prostate Cancer Biomarker: Work-in-Progress.

Authors:  Karriem S Watson; Vida Henderson; Marcus Murray; Adam B Murphy; Josef Ben Levi; Tiffany McDowell; Alfreda Holloway-Beth; Pooja Gogana; Michael A Dixon; LeAndre Moore; Ivanhoe Hall; Alexander Kimbrough; Yamilé Molina; Robert A Winn
Journal:  Prog Community Health Partnersh       Date:  2019

10.  Parent and public interest in whole-genome sequencing.

Authors:  Daniel S Dodson; Aaron J Goldenberg; Matthew M Davis; Dianne C Singer; Beth A Tarini
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2015-03-06       Impact factor: 2.000

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.