Literature DB >> 31328612

Attitudes Regarding Enrollment in a Genetic Research Project: An Informed Consent Simulation Study Comparing Views of People With Depression, Diabetes, and Neither Condition.

Jane Paik Kim1, Katie Ryan1, Laura Weiss Roberts1.   

Abstract

In this study, participants with a self-reported history of depression, diabetes, or no illness underwent a simulated informed consent process for a hypothetical genetic study related to depression or diabetes. Participants completed a survey assessing their perceived understanding of the research process, perceptions of its risks and benefits, their satisfaction with the informed consent process, and their readiness to make a hypothetical enrollment decision. All participants indicated strong readiness to make an enrollment decision regarding the research characterized in the simulation. Participants reported understanding the consent process relatively well and being generally satisfied with it. Greater concerns were expressed regarding psychosocial risks than biological risks for genetic studies on mental disorders. Our study documented positive attitudes toward volunteering for research that involved the collection of genetic data.

Entities:  

Keywords:  attitudes; depression; diabetes; genetics; informed consent; research participation

Year:  2019        PMID: 31328612      PMCID: PMC6733621          DOI: 10.1177/1556264619862467

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics        ISSN: 1556-2646            Impact factor:   1.742


  28 in total

Review 1.  Informed consent and the capacity for voluntarism.

Authors:  Laura Weiss Roberts
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 18.112

2.  Enhancing comprehension of consent for research in older patients with psychosis: a randomized study of a novel consent procedure.

Authors:  L B Dunn; L A Lindamer; B W Palmer; L J Schneiderman; D V Jeste
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 18.112

3.  Decisional capacity for informed consent in schizophrenia research.

Authors:  W T Carpenter; J M Gold; A C Lahti; C A Queern; R R Conley; J J Bartko; J Kovnick; P S Appelbaum
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  2000-06

4.  How acceptable are innovative health-care technologies? A survey of public beliefs and attitudes in England and Wales.

Authors:  Michael Calnan; David Montaner; Rob Horne
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2004-11-13       Impact factor: 4.634

5.  Assessment of capacity to consent to research among older persons with schizophrenia, Alzheimer disease, or diabetes mellitus: comparison of a 3-item questionnaire with a comprehensive standardized capacity instrument.

Authors:  Barton W Palmer; Laura B Dunn; Paul S Appelbaum; Sunder Mudaliar; Leon Thal; Robert Henry; Shahrokh Golshan; Dilip V Jeste
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  2005-07

6.  Perspectives of patients with schizophrenia and psychiatrists regarding ethically important aspects of research participation.

Authors:  L W Roberts; T D Warner; J L Brody
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 18.112

7.  Influence of ethical safeguards on research participation: comparison of perspectives of people with schizophrenia and psychiatrists.

Authors:  Laura W Roberts; Katherine A Green Hammond; Teddy D Warner; Rae Lewis
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 18.112

8.  Patient and psychiatrist ratings of hypothetical schizophrenia research protocols: assessment of harm potential and factors influencing participation decisions.

Authors:  Laura Weiss Roberts; Teddy D Warner; Janet L Brody; Brian Roberts; John Lauriello; Constantine Lyketsos
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 18.112

9.  To test or not to test: interest in genetic testing for Alzheimer's disease among middle-aged adults.

Authors:  Stephen J Cutler; Lynne G Hodgson
Journal:  Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen       Date:  2003 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.035

10.  Cross-cultural perspectives on research participation and informed consent.

Authors:  Paula C Barata; Enza Gucciardi; Farah Ahmad; Donna E Stewart
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2005-07-20       Impact factor: 4.634

View more
  1 in total

1.  Perceived protectiveness of research safeguards and influences on willingness to participate in research: A novel MTurk pilot study.

Authors:  Jane Paik Kim; Katie Ryan; Tenzin Tsungmey; Max Kasun; Willa A Roberts; Laura B Dunn; Laura Weiss Roberts
Journal:  J Psychiatr Res       Date:  2021-04-06       Impact factor: 5.250

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.